![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
| |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Summary
|
AAP Advance Australia Party
AC Australian Constitutionalis
AFI Australians Against Further Immigration
ALP Australian Labor Party
ANAG Australian National Action Group
AntiSoc Anti-Socialist
AP Australia Party
APPG Australian Pensioner Pressure Group
AR Australian Republican
ARM Australian Reform Movement
ASP Australian Shooters Party
Atok Atokist
CDP Christian Democratic Party
CCE Conservatives for Climate and Environment
CEC Citizens Electoral Council
Com Communist Party
Cons Conservative
Const Constitutionalist
CP Country Party
CRep Constitutional Republican
CTA Call to Australia
Dem Australian Democrats
DLP Democratic Labor Party
DOGS Council for the Defence of Government Schools
DSP Deadly Serious Party
EcRef Economic Reform
FF Family First
FishP The Fishing Party
FLP Federal Labor Party
FLR Family Law Reform Party
FP Farmers' Party
FPA Federal Party of Australia
FST Australia First Party
FT Free Trade
Grn Greens
Gry Grey Power
GWA The Greens (WA)
HAN Pauline Hanson’s One Nation
HMP Help End Marijuana Prohibition
HPA Hope Party Australia
ICP Independent CP
ILab Independent Labor
ILCL Independent Liberal Country League
ILib Independent Liberal
INat Independent Nationalist
Ind Independent
LDP Liberty and Democracy Party
LFF Liberals for forests
Lib Liberal Party
LibF Liberal Forum
LLab Lang Labor
LP Liberal Party
LRG Liberal Reform Group
NA National Alliance
NAP New Australian Party
Nat Nationalist
NCPP Non-Custodial Parents Party
NGST No GST Party
NHP National Humanitarian Party
NLP Natural Law Party
NP National Party
NSP National Socialist Party
ON One Nation
ONNSW One Nation NSW Division
PCP Progressive Conservative Party
PLP Progressive Labour Party
PORP Property Owners’ Rights Party
PP Progress Party
Prot Protectionist
ProtLab Protestant Labor
RARI Reclaim Australia: Reduce Immigration
RPA Republican Party of Australia
RSNP Returned Soldiers National Party
SA Socialist Alliance
SC Social Credit
SLib State Liberal
Soc Socialist
SPA Socialist Party of Australia
SWP Socialist Workers’ Party
TA Taxpayers' Association
UAP United Australia Party
UM Uninflated Movement
Unite Unite Australia Party
UTG United Tasmanian Group
UWU Unemployed Workers Union
VFU Victorian Farmers’ Union
VOTE Voice of the Elderly
This Research Paper details the 144 by-elections for the House of Representatives held to date, and includes some of the factors involved in their being held.
It also discusses relevant factors such as the timing of by-elections, the number of nominations, the voter turnout and party performance over the years, and the swings that have occurred.
The paper concludes with a general discussion of some of the personal and political aspects of the by-elections.
By-elections are held to fill vacancies in the House of Representatives resulting from the death, resignation, absence without leave, expulsion, disqualification or ineligibility of a Member:
Of the 144 by-elections, 67 (46.5 per cent) have occurred because of the death of the member, 71 (49.3 per cent) as the result of the resignation of the member, five (3.5 per cent) because of voided elections, and one (0.7 per cent) because of the expulsion of the member from the House (Kalgoorlie 1920).
The pattern has altered quite markedly, however:
|
Years |
Vacancy due to |
Vacancy due to |
Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1901–70 |
63.3 |
31.6 |
5.1 |
| Since 1971 |
11.1 |
86.7 |
2.2 |
Various factors are probably relevant here.
Members today enter the House of Representatives at a significantly younger age than used to be the case. Of the 41 parliaments to date, the second quarter’s intake (1929–51) was the oldest, averaging 48.3 years per new Member. By contrast, the fourth quarter's intake (1977–2005) was the youngest at 42.2 years per new Member.[2] Another factor is the greater preparedness of Members to leave Parliament before death, quite often to pursue another career. This has been aided by a third consideration, namely the general increase in longevity of male Australians.
The Constitution (s. 33) confers on the Speaker of the House of Representatives the power to issue a writ for the election of a new Member. The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 specifies that the election must be held between 33 and 68 days from the date the writ is issued.
There is no prescribed time period within which a by-election writ must be issued, and, in fact, there is no accepted view as to the period that should elapse between vacancy and polling day.
Perhaps surprisingly, this has not become a matter of any long-term political debate, allowing governments a great deal of freedom in the setting of by-election dates. The length of time from a vacancy until polling day has therefore varied considerably, with the maximum number of days being the 82 days for Moreton in 1983, and the minimum being the 17 days for East Sydney in 1903.[3] The total elapsed time from vacancy to election has increased since 1901. Between 1901 and 1949, the average was 40.3 days, whereas during the period 1949 to 2008 the average has been 51.5 days. The average figure for all by-elections has been 47.0 days.
Ideally, by-elections are held as early as possible after a seat becomes vacant, ‘so that the electors are not left without representation any longer than is necessary’.[4] In fact, such a consideration is occasionally pushed aside by short-term political factors. On 22 October 1982, the member for Flinders (Phillip Lynch) resigned his seat. The Speaker fixed 4 December as the date for a by-election, but also declared that there would be a delay of three almost three weeks before the writs for the by-election would be issued. According to Anne Summers, this gave the Fraser Government the option of calling a general election for 4 or 11 December. The by-election could therefore have been pushed aside.[5]
In the cases of the eight by-elections held during 1994–5, the delay between the date of the seat becoming vacant and the date of the issuing of the writ varied considerably. The cases of Mackellar (35 days) and Kooyong (27 days) contrasted with the virtually instantaneous issuing of writs for by-elections in Fremantle, Boynthon and Warringah:
|
Division |
Held by |
Date of vacancy |
Date of writ |
Delay in issuing writ |
Elapsed time from vacancy to election |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Werriwa (NSW) |
ALP |
22.12.93 |
24.12.93 |
2 days |
38 days |
| Fremantle (WA) |
ALP |
04.02.94 |
04.02.94 |
None |
36 days |
| Bonython (SA) |
ALP |
11.02.94 |
11.02.94 |
None |
36 days |
| Mackellar (NSW) |
LP |
14.01.94 |
18.02.94 |
35 days |
71 days |
| Warringah (NSW) |
LP |
18.02.94 |
18.02.94 |
None |
36 days |
| Kooyong (Vic) |
LP |
17.09.94 |
14.10.94 |
27 days |
63 days |
| Canberra (ACT) |
ALP |
30.01.95 |
17.02.95 |
18 days |
54 days |
| Wentworth (NSW) |
LP |
28.02.95 |
03.03.95 |
3 days |
39 days |
The variation that is allowed in regard to by-election dates is thus an anomaly in an electoral system that is generally highly regulated.
Appendix 4 provides details of the timing of all by-elections held between September 1901 and September 2008. It also shows the number of days elapsed between the seat becoming vacant and the by-election date, as well as the number of days elapsed since the previous general election, and the number of days between the by-election and the next general election.
There have been 20 occasions when the Speaker has in fact declined to issue such a writ for a by-election due to a pending general election. The longest period a seat has been without a member prior to a general election was 128 days in the case of Hindmarsh in 1909–10. The shortest period was the 39 days between the plane crash on 13 August 1940 that killed three MPs, and the election of 21 September 1940.
| Division |
Vacant |
Next election |
Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter (NSW) |
30.09.03 |
16.12.03 |
77 |
| Indi (Vic) |
12.10.06 |
12.12.06 |
61 |
| Northern Melbourne (Vic) |
13.10.06 |
12.12.06 |
60 |
| Hindmarsh (SA) |
06.12.09 |
13.04.10 |
128 |
| East Sydney (NSW) |
24.12.09 |
13.04.10 |
110 |
| West Sydney (NSW) |
06.09.28 |
17.11.28 |
72 |
| Wimmera (Vic) |
14.10.31 |
19.12.31 |
66 |
| Martin (NSW) |
05.06.34 |
15.09.34 |
102 |
| Ballarat (Vic) |
31.07.34 |
15.09.34 |
46 |
| Werriwa (NSW) |
02.08.34 |
15.09.34 |
44 |
| Henty (Vic) |
13.08.40 |
21.09.40 |
39 |
| Flinders (Vic) |
13.08.40 |
21.09.40 |
39 |
| Corangamite (Vic) |
13.08.40 |
21.09.40 |
39 |
| West Sydney (NSW) |
14.08.46 |
28.09.46 |
45 |
| Hindmarsh (SA) |
14.08.46 |
28.09.46 |
45 |
| McMillan (Vic) |
14.10.55 |
10.12.55 |
57 |
| Leichhardt (Qld) |
11.10.58 |
22.11.58 |
42 |
| Warringah (NSW) |
03.08.66 |
26.11.66 |
110 |
| Bonython (SA) |
30.09.77 |
10.12.77 |
71 |
| Wills (Vic) |
25.11.92 |
13.03.93 |
108 |
The 141 by-elections have been contested by an average of 4.8 candidates. Over the years, however, there has been a steady increase in the number of nominations.
In the 24 First-past-the-post cases between 1901 and October 1918 the average number of nominations was 2.2 per contest.
In the 120 Preferential Voting cases there have been an average of 5.5 nominations per by-election:
The record number of nominations occurred in the 1992 by-election in the Victorian electorate of Wills, when 22 nominations were received to fill the seat vacated by former Prime Minister Hawke. The 2005 Werriwa by-election had 16 nominations, the second-highest on record.
| Years |
By-elections |
Average number of candidates |
Largest number of candidates |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1901–2008 |
141 |
4.8 |
22 (Wills 1992) |
| 1901–18 (First-past-the-post) |
24 |
2.2 |
4 (Tasmania 1902) |
| 1918–2008 (Preferential voting) |
117 |
5.5 |
22 (Wills 1992) |
| Preferential voting |
|||
| 1918–29 |
15 |
3.1 |
5 (3 cases) |
| 1930–39 |
12 |
3.7 |
6 (Wilmot 1939) |
| 1940–49 |
7 |
4.0 |
7 (Wimmera 1946) |
| 1950–59 |
16 |
3.7 |
6 (3 cases) |
| 1960–69 |
22 |
3.9 |
5 (8 cases) |
| 1970–79 |
8 |
6.5 |
12 (Parramatta 1973) |
| 1980–89 |
18 |
6.1 |
12 (Lowe 1982) |
| 1990–99 |
14 |
8.1 |
22 (Wills 1992) |
| 2000–08 |
8 |
10.4 |
16 (Werriwa 2005) |
In only four cases, or 2.8 per cent, was a by-election contested by just a single candidate (Kalgoorlie 1913, Dalley 1915, Wide Bay 1928, Cunningham 1956).
In recent years there has been a tendency for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents' safe seats. Since 1990 the incumbent government has failed to contest 13 of the 22 by-elections held. In all cases bar one this has meant an easy win to the party holding the seat. In the case of Cunningham in 2002, however, the absence of a Liberal candidate helped the Australian Green candidate win the seat from the ALP.[6]
By contrast, the official Opposition has contested every by-election since Bradfield in 1952. In seven cases (4.9 per cent), over the whole period the Opposition has failed to contest a by-election (Darling Downs 1901, Echuca 1907, Dalley 1915, Echuca 1919, Wide Bay 1928, Balaclava 1929, Bradfield 1952).
In 35 of the 144 by-elections (24.3 per cent) a seat has altered its party complexion:
| Division |
Government |
Sitting party |
Winning party |
|---|---|---|---|
| Melbourne (Vic) 1904 |
Prot |
Prot |
ALP |
| Riverina (NSW) 1904 |
ALP |
FT |
Prot |
| Adelaide (SA) 1908 |
Prot |
Prot |
ALP |
| Boothby (SA) 1911 |
ALP |
ALP |
Lib |
| Grampians (Vic) 1915 |
ALP |
ALP |
Lib |
| Wide Bay (Qld) 1915 |
ALP |
ALP |
Lib |
| Swan (WA) 1918 |
Nat |
Nat |
ALP |
| Corangamite (Vic) 1918 |
Nat |
Nat |
VFU |
| Echuca (Vic) 1919 |
Nat |
Nat |
VFU |
| Ballarat (Vic) 1920 |
Nat |
Nat |
ALP |
| Kalgoorlie (WA) 1920 |
Nat |
ALP |
Nat |
| Maranoa (Qld) 1921 |
Nat |
ALP |
CP |
| Wide Bay (Qld) 1928 |
Nat |
Nat |
CP |
| Franklin (Tas) 1929 |
ALP |
Ind |
ALP |
| Parkes (NSW) 1931 |
ALP |
ALP |
Nat |
| East Sydney (NSW) 1932 |
UAP |
UAP |
LLab |
| Darling Downs (Qld) 1936 |
UAP |
UAP |
CP |
| Gwydir (NSW) 1937 |
UAP/CP |
CP |
ALP |
| Wakefield (SA) 1938 |
UAP/CP |
UAP |
ALP |
| Wilmot (Tas) 1939 |
UAP/CP |
UAP |
ALP |
| Corio (Vic) 1940 |
UAP |
UAP |
ALP |
| Henty (Vic) 1946 |
ALP |
Ind |
LP |
| Flinders (Vic) 1952 |
LP/CP |
LP |
ALP |
| Calare (NSW) 1960 |
LP/CP |
LP |
CP |
| Dawson (Qld) 1966 |
LP/CP |
CP |
ALP |
| Corio (Vic) 1967 |
LP/CP |
LP |
ALP |
| Bass (Tas) 1975 |
ALP |
ALP |
LP |
| Lowe (NSW) 1982 |
LP/NP |
LP |
ALP |
| Adelaide (SA) 1988 |
ALP |
ALP |
LP |
| Groom (Qld) 1988 |
ALP |
NP |
LP |
| Wills (Vic) 1992 |
ALP |
ALP |
Ind |
| Canberra (ACT) 1995 |
ALP |
ALP |
LP |
| Ryan (Qld) 2001 |
LP/NP |
LP |
ALP |
| Cunningham (NSW) 2002 |
LP/NP |
ALP |
Grn |
| Lyne (NSW) 2008 |
ALP |
NP |
Ind |
Note: By the time of the Grampians by-election of 1917, the Liberal Party had been subsumed by the Nationalist Party. This by-election is therefore not included as an occasion when the seat changed party hands.
In twenty-four by-elections (16.7 per cent) the seat has been lost by the government of the day.
In terms of winning seats from other parties, over the long haul the major non-Labor parties of the day have not done quite as well as their rivals:
| Party |
Seats gained |
Seats lost |
|---|---|---|
| ALP |
14 |
11 |
| Major non-Labor parties* |
11 |
18 |
| CP/NP |
4 |
3 |
| Other |
5 |
2 |
* These figures include Riverina 1904, won by the Protectionists from the Free Traders.
On nine of the 34 occasions where a seat has changed party hands at a by-election (Boothby 1911, Swan 1918, Kalgoorlie 1920, Wakefield 1938, Wilmot 1939, Flinders 1952, Adelaide 1988, Canberra 1995 and Ryan 2001), the party that won the seat at the by-election lost the seat at the next general election.
The fact that relatively few seats have changed party hands in by-elections is probably due more to the propensity for by-elections to occur in safe seats, rather than any other factor. Political parties and individual members are only too aware of the possible political consequences of losing a seat at a by-election, and thus try to ensure that by-elections caused by resignation occur only in relatively safe seats. For example, since 1949, of the 56 by-elections that were caused by the resignation of the sitting member, only nine have been in marginal seats (i.e. seats requiring a swing of less than 6.0 per cent to change hands). By far the largest number of by-elections, 32, have occurred in safe seats (i.e. seats requiring a swing of over 10 per cent to change hands).
| No |
% of total |
|
|---|---|---|
| Marginal |
9 |
16.4 |
| Fairly Safe |
14 |
25.5 |
| Safe |
32 |
58.2 |
| Total |
55 |
100.0 |
Of the 67 seats vacated by death, 15 have been lost by the party holding the seat, identical figures for the 71 seats vacated by resignation.
Apart from a party’s success or defeat in a by-election, the most important aspect of a by-election is the swing that takes place. Conventional wisdom holds that there is usually a swing against the government of the day at a by-election. The success or otherwise of a government, opposition, or party leader at the by-election is often measured by the size of the swing in comparison with the average swing recorded in past by-elections. However, by-elections occur in varied and disparate electoral divisions, with different numbers and mixes of candidates, and with a variety of local, state and national issues involved. It could therefore be argued that given the variety of factors involved, there is no 'normal' by-election swing. By-elections are held in such varying circumstances that none can be regarded as typical, and it is generally agreed that any swing that occurs, is usually explained by the special factors pertaining to each by-election.[9]
By-election swings can be calculated by comparing the first preference and two-party preferred votes received by the various parties at the by-election, with the votes at the previous general election. The two-party preferred swing is more commonly used, as it overcomes some of the difficulties inherent in using first preference swings. First preference swings can be affected by the number and nature of candidates and parties contesting the by-election when compared with the previous general election.
Average first preference and two-party preferred vote swings for by-elections held between 1949 and September 2008 are given below. Swings cannot be calculated where one of the major parties (i.e. ALP or LP/NP Coalition) did not stand a candidate at the by-election or the preceding general election, or where the division was uncontested at the by-election or the preceding general election.
|
First Preference Swing Average swing |
Two-party Preferred Swing |
|
|---|---|---|
| All By-elections |
-5.7% |
-4.0% |
| Government held seats |
-6.6% |
-5.0% |
| LP/NP Governments |
-4.8% |
-3.4% |
| ALP Governments |
-8.2% |
-5.4% |
| By-elections caused by death |
-3.0% |
-2.5% |
| By-elections caused by resignation |
-7.2% |
-5.0% |
The average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day in all by-elections held during the period 1949 to 2008 was 4.0 per cent. The swing against ALP governments, 5.4 per cent, was somewhat higher than the swing against LP/NP Coalition governments, 3.4 per cent, while the swing against the government of the day in government-held seats was 5.0 per cent. The average two-party preferred swing in by-elections caused by the death of the sitting member was half the swing in by-elections caused by the resignation of the member.
Two-party preferred swings at by-elections during the period have varied from an anti-government swing of 16.1 per cent (Canberra 1995) to a swing of 16.2 per cent to the government (McPherson 1981). The largest swing against an ALP Government was the Canberra figure, while the largest swing against a LP/(CP)NP Coalition Government was achieved when Gough Whitlam won Werriwa in 1952 with a 12.4 per cent swing. Two-party preferred swings to the government of the day are a rare event in by-elections, with only ten being recorded during the period. The largest swing to an ALP Government was in Wills in 1992 with a 5.9 per cent swing (although the ALP lost the seat to an independent candidate, P. Cleary) while the largest swing to a LP/NP Coalition Government was in McPherson, referred to above. Because the number of candidates contesting a by-election is generally larger than the number contesting the previous general election, first preference swings against the government tend to be higher than two-party preferred swings.
| ALP Government |
LP/NP Government |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Division |
Swing |
Division |
Swing |
|
| Parramatta 1973 |
-6.6 |
Balaclava 1951 |
-3.4 |
|
| Bass 1975 |
-14.6 |
Macquarie 1951 |
+0.1 |
|
| Wannon 1983 |
-1.5 |
Lyne 1952 |
-8.8 |
|
| Bruce 1983 |
-3.8 |
Flinders 1952 |
-11.0 |
|
| Moreton 1983 |
-1.2 |
Werriwa 1952 |
-12.4 |
|
| Corangamite 1984 |
-1.3 |
Bradfield 1952 |
n.a. |
|
| Hughes 1984 |
-5.0 |
Dalley 1953 |
n.a. |
|
| Richmond 1984 |
+0.5 |
Lang 1953 |
-2.5 |
|
| Scullin 1986 |
-4.4 |
Corangamite 1953 |
-6.5 |
|
| Adelaide 1988 |
-8.4 |
Gwydir 1953 |
-0.4 |
|
| Port Adelaide 1988 |
-11.1 |
Cook 1955 |
n.a. |
|
| Groom 1988 |
-5.2 |
Cunningham 1956 |
n.a. |
|
| Oxley 1988 |
-11.8 |
Barker 1956 |
-9.9 |
|
| Gwydir 1989 |
n.a. |
Wentworth 1956 |
n.a. |
|
| Menzies 1991 |
n.a. |
Richmond 1957 |
n.a. |
|
| Wills 1992 |
+5.9 |
Parramatta 1958 |
-6.4 |
|
| Werriwa 1994 |
-6.3 |
Hunter 1960 |
n.a. |
|
| Fremantle 1994 |
+1.0 |
La Trobe 1960 |
-7.5 |
|
| Bonython 1994 |
-7.8 |
Balaclava 1960 |
-4.6 |
|
| Mackellar 1994 |
n.a. |
Bendigo 1960 |
+0.1 |
|
| Warringah 1994 |
n.a. |
Calare 1960 |
+1.0 |
|
| Kooyong 1994 |
n.a. |
Higinbotham 1960 |
-9.2 |
|
| Canberra 1995 |
-16.1 |
Batman 1962 |
n.a. |
|
| Wentworth 1995 |
n.a. |
Grey 1963 |
+4.9 |
|
| Gippsland 2008 |
-6.1 |
East Sydney 1963 |
n.a. |
|
| Lyne 2008 |
n.a. |
Denison 1964 |
-1.9 |
|
| Mayo 2008 |
n.a. |
Angas 1964 |
-2.1 |
|
| |
Parramatta 1964 |
-3.0 |
||
| Robertson 1964 |
-1.4 |
|||
| Riverina 1965 |
-0.9 |
|||
| Dawson 1966 |
-11.9 |
|||
| Kooyong 1966 |
-3.8 |
|||
| Corio 1967 |
-11.1 |
|||
| Capricornia 1967 |
+1.5 |
|||
| Higgins 1968 |
-0.3 |
|||
| Curtin 1969 |
-7.1 |
|||
| Bendigo 1969 |
+2.1 |
|||
| Gwydir 1969 |
-7.7 |
|||
| Australian Capital Territory 1970 |
+13.8 |
|||
| Chisholm 1970 |
-2.8 |
|||
| Murray 1971 |
-0.4 |
|||
| Cunningham 1977 |
-0.3 |
|||
| Werriwa 1978 |
-11.3 |
|||
| Grayndler 1979 |
-6.9 |
|||
| McPherson 1981 |
+16.2 |
|||
| Boothby 1981 |
-1.2 |
|||
| Curtin 1981 |
-7.5 |
|||
| Wentworth 1981 |
-6.2 |
|||
| Lowe 1982 |
-8.5 |
|||
| Flinders 1982 |
-3.3 |
|||
| Blaxland 1996 |
n.a. |
|||
| Lindsay 1996 |
+5.0 |
|||
| Fraser 1997 |
n.a. |
|||
| Holt 1999 |
n.a. |
|||
| Isaacs 2000 |
n.a. |
|||
| Ryan 2001 |
-9.7 |
|||
| Aston 2001 |
-3.7 |
|||
n.a. not applicable
A stark listing of 144 electoral contests can disguise the fact that many of them involved noteworthy personal and political matters that are part of Australia’s political history. Some of these are referred to below.
A number of members were senior politicians before they entered the national Parliament, with this latter service being the swan-song for a number of them:
Six future Prime Ministers entered the House of Representatives via by-elections. For Stanley Melbourne Bruce (Flinders 1918), Harold Holt (Fawkner 1935), Arthur Fadden (Darling Downs 1936) and Gough Whitlam (Werriwa 1952) this saw their entry into Parliament for the first time. James Scullin (Yarra 1922) had already served a term during 1910–13, while John Gorton (Higgins 1968) had recently retired from the Senate.
The passing from Parliament of fifteen of the twenty-five MPs who have held the office of Prime Minister has been the trigger for a by-election:
Of the thirteen Leaders of the Opposition who have never become Prime Minister, the passing from Parliament of seven has caused a by-election:
The retirement of both Alexander Downer sen. (Angas 1964) and Alexander Downer jun. (Mayo 2008) were both the occasion for a by-election to be held.
Many retiring MPs have been replaced by family members. In four by-elections such a generational transfer has been from father to son:
In two cases the family transfer has been from uncle to nephew:
Some MPs have achieved a national prominence prior to their election to the House of Representatives via a by-election:
Many MPs have been appointed to prominent positions, thus ending their parliamentary careers. Some have seen this as an ideal way in which to leave the political hurly-burly, while for others there has been a suggestion that this was a means to push a potential leadership contender out of the picture:
On 7 November 1920 Hugh Mahon chaired a public meeting in Melbourne sponsored by the Irish Ireland League, and in a speech attacking the British presence in Ireland, spoke of ‘this bloody and accursed Empire’. His expulsion from the House of Representatives four days later for his 'seditious and disloyal utterances', was due to the House finding that he had been ‘guilty of conduct unfitting him to remain a member of this House’. Mahon's is the only expulsion to have occurred from the Parliament, and it forced a by-election (Kalgoorlie 1920). The House of Representatives lost this power with the passage of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987.
Occasionally by-elections can be seen as having an importance beyond the immediate contest to fill a vacancy in the House of Representatives.
Some are a sign of things to come electorally:
Other by-elections have had a different type of political impact:
Some by-elections have been caused by the voiding of particular results after a general election: Melbourne and Riverina in 1904, Echuca 1907, Ballarat 1920 and Lindsay 1996.
The Wills by-election of 1992 was itself voided, but another by-election was not held because of the proximity of the next general election.
|
No. |
|---|