 |
Bills Digest no. 80 2006–07
AusCheck Bill 2006
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced
and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have
any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine
the subsequent official status of the Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Financial Implications
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
AusCheck
Bill 2006
Date introduced: 7
December 2006
House: House of
Representatives
Portfolio: Attorney-General
Commencement: Day after receiving the Royal
Assent
The Bill establishes the AusCheck scheme which will
be the Australian background checking service for people who work in
the Australian maritime and aviation industries.
On 5 December
2005, the Australian Government
announced plans to establish a centralised government vetting agency
(AusCheck) as part of the Attorney-General’s National Security and Criminal
Justice Group. AusCheck will also be responsible for notifying the relevant
issuing authority of the outcome of the background checks.(1)
To provide a regulatory framework for establishment of a centralised
background checking service by the Attorney-General’s Department,
for the purposes of coordinating and conducting certain criminal,
security and other background checking.
To give the Attorney-General’s Department the authority to coordinate
background criminal and security assessments for the applicants for
the Aviation Security Identity Card (ASIC) and the Maritime Security
Identification Card (MSIC) and any subsequent schemes. The bill also
gives to and confirms the authority of the Attorney-General’s Department:
-
to maintain a database of applicants and cardholders
-
to collect, use and disclose information; and
-
to recover costs for conducting background checks.
However, AusCheck’s initial role will be limited to
background checks for the ASIC and MSIC schemes. The bill includes general
provisions which will allow AusCheck to expand its role in the future
for other background checking schemes. The government argues that this
will minimise duplication for people who need to apply for background
checks for different purposes.(3)

Since the events of 11
September 2001, the Australian government has initiated a
systematic and comprehensive review of security threats and measures
relating to terrorism.(4) Significantly, there has been
an extensive review of transport security in Australia.
One of the major reviews in this area was the 2005
review of airport security and policing headed by Sir
John Wheeler (the
Wheeler Report). The results of that review have contributed to
the development of a panoply of tailored and strategic counter-terrorism
policies and measures.
An ASIC is required if a person needs to work in an
airside area or a landside security zone—collectively the ‘secure area’—at
a security controlled airport that has regular public transport services.
Implemented on 1
January 2007, a MSIC is required if a person needs to work
unescorted or unmonitored in a maritime security zone. The MSIC scheme
covers waterfront workers, seafarers on Australian regulated ships,
customs brokers and shipping agents, contractors, service providers
and maintenance workers, truck drivers, train operators and anyone who
works onboard an offshore oil or gas facility.
The ASIC or MSIC indicates that the holder has been
background-checked and that the check revealed that they are of suitable
character to be in a secure area. The identity of the person seeking
the card is verified, then a background check is conducted including:
a criminal history check by CrimTrac, a security assessment by the Australian
Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and where required, an Authority
to Work in Australia
check by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.
The ASIC is valid for two years, while the MSIC is
valid for five years. Upon expiry of the card—and assuming there is
still a valid reason to access security designated area(s)—a full background
check is again conducted of the person’s proof of identity, criminal
convictions, and, if necessary, authority to work in Australia. The
security assessment by ASIO remains ‘active’ after the person obtains
their initial ASIC or MSIC.(5)
Following a recommendation of the Wheeler Report,(6)
AusCheck was established to:
-
enhance national security by establishing greater
and conspicuous control by Government of security arrangements at
air and sea ports
-
maintain a database of up-to-date information on
persons who apply for and are ultimately issued with an ASIC and/
or MSIC
-
mitigate the risk of ASIC and MSIC cards going to
ineligible persons, by preventing the use of fraudulent proof of identity
documents to support the issue of an ASIC or MSIC
-
reduce duplication and improve the consistency and
response time of background checking in the aviation and maritime
industries, and
-
provide capacity to be used for other background
checking purposes.(7)
AusCheck will operate on a cost recovery basis and
maintain a comprehensive database of all applicants and cardholders
for the aviation and maritime industries.
AusCheck will help the aviation and maritime industries
to identify individuals who should not be eligible for an ASIC or MSIC,
by applying a consistent interpretation of the statutory requirements
and providing a recommendation to the relevant issuing body.
In December 2006,
the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit recommended that AusCheck’s
role be expanded to include issuing ASICs and MSICs. The Committee had
received evidence from aviation industry groups that there were significant
delays in the issuing of some cards (currently undertaken by 188 registered
airports and airlines).(8) The government has yet to respond
to this recommendation.
The 2006-07 Budget
provided $22.3 million for the establishment of AusCheck.(9)
The Explanatory Memorandum states that the estimated annual cost of
operating AusCheck service delivery is $8-9 million. However, it is
anticipated that this will be cost recovered from the aviation and maritime
industries.(10)

Clause
4 – Several items are defined in this clause.
The most noteworthy is ‘AusCheck scheme’. It means the scheme prescribed
for the purposes of clause 8 of the bill. The regulations may
provide for the establishment of the background checking scheme relating
to the conduct and coordination of background checks of individuals
for the purposes of:
-
the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 or
regulations under that Act and
-
the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities
Security Act or regulations under that Act, and
-
for such other purposes as are prescribed by the
regulations.
The ‘other such purposes’ referred to above are notably
very broad in terms of their scope and reach. They include purposes
related to:(11)
-
external affairs
-
-
Australia’s
national security or defence or to a national emergency
-
money expenditure of money by the Commonwealth, including
the granting of financial assistance to a State
-
the executive power of the Commonwealth
-
the collection of statistics
-
a Territory or to a Commonwealth place
-
overseas or interstate/territory trade and commerce
-
the provision of a background checking service to
a constitutional corporation, where:
-
the service involves conducting a background
check in respect of one or more employees of the constitutional
corporation
-
the background check is relevant to the relationship
between the constitutional corporation and the employee or employee
-
a postal, telegraphic, telephonic or other like service
-
the provision of allowances, pensions, child endowment,
benefits or services referred to in paragraph 51(xxiiiA) of the Constitution
-
providing a service to the Commonwealth; or a Commonwealth
authority
-
matters incidental to the execution of any of the
legislative powers of the Parliament or the executive power of the
Commonwealth
-
using the spare capacity of AusCheck staff or maintaining
or improving the specialised skills of AusCheck staff through providing
a service, or
-
any other matter that the Parliament has the power
to make laws about.
In the
bill the term ‘personal information’ has the same meaning as
it does in the Privacy Act
1988. Under the Privacy Act “personal information”
means information or an opinion (including information or an opinion
forming part of a database), whether true or not, and whether recorded
in a material form or not, about an individual whose identity is
apparent, or can reasonably be ascertained, from the information
or opinion.
The Explanatory Memorandum points out that the term
‘background check’ is the linchpin of the description of the function
established by the bill.(12) A background check involves
an assessment of particular types of information relating to an individual
person. It includes an assessment of one or more of the following types
of information:(13)
-
the person’s criminal history
-
information that ASIO makes in relation to the person
-
information about the person’s migration status if
the person is not an Australian citizen, and
-
other types of information about the person as are
prescribed by the regulations.
The wording of paragraph 5 (d) provides an apparently
generous allowance for information collection.
The process by which personal information is acquired
and assessed for a background check is set out in Part 2 – Establishment
of the AusCheck scheme and in clause 18, the regulation making
power.
This clause enables regulations to be made which will
provide the necessary detail for the AusCheck scheme of background checking.
Sub-clause 9(1) enumerates
a variety of matters that may be provided for by the regulations.
The regulations may provide for an application for
a background check to be made by:
-
the person to whom the background check will relate,
or
-
by another person (for example, an employer), but
with the consent of the person about whom the background check is
being made.
The regulations may specify the information that is
to be included in an application for a background check, as well as
the form of advice that is to be given to the applicant and the person
to whom the background check relates. The regulations may also set the
form of advice to be given to other persons about the results of the
background check.
The criteria used to judge the information gathered
by the background check, and the decisions that can be made based on
the results of the background check can also be defined in the regulations.
However, certain specific classes of background checks will not require
such criteria to be set out in regulations under the AusCheck scheme
if they are already set out in other legislation (subclause 9(3)). This
is the case in relation to background checks for ASICs and MSICs – the
criteria and decision making powers in relation to these are already
provided for in regulations under the Aviation Transport Security
Act 2004 and the Maritime Transport and Offshore Facilities Security
Act 2003.
Sub-clauses (2) and (3) permit regulations for background
checks to be relevantly tailored for different industry or activity
requirements.
The AusCheck scheme may require a person to apply for
and pass a background check before they are permitted to:
-
gain access to certain information, place or thing
-
have a certain power or function under a law exercised
in relation to the individual (for example, the granting of a licence
or permit), or
-
hold certain jobs or positions.
The Explanatory Memorandum states that it is envisaged
that the use of such a provision would be confined to situations where
a certain class of background checks was required to implement policy
that had not been provided for by other legislation. It is expected
that future background checking schemes will be constructed under the
provisions of an Act under the relevant portfolio which provides the
appropriate policy framework.(14)
The Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit recommended
that AusCheck decisions should be subject to appeal through the Administrative
Appeals Tribunal (AAT).(15) On the face of it, this would
seem a good idea given that AusCheck’s role may be dramatically extended
via regulation, as outlined in clauses 4 (c) and 5 (d).
Decisions regarding ASICs and MSICs are already appellable
to the AAT under the existing regulations. Similarly, adverse or qualified
ASIO security assessments may be appealed, under the Australian Security
Intelligence Organisation Act 1979. While the Explanatory Memorandum
states that it is expected that future background checking schemes would
be constructed under specific Acts, it may be prudent to insert a general
provision for appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, in the
event that this is not provided for in specific legislation.
This clause gives power to the Secretary of the Department
to give directions to a person who has applied for a background check,
or who is required or allowed to take action in matters related to a
background check. Subclause (2) states that this power may include –but
not be confined to – instructing a person to notify the Secretary as
to whether or not a licence, permit or other authorisation has been
issued to a person in respect of whom a background check has been performed.
A penalty may be imposed by regulations for failure
to comply with a direction by the Secretary.(16)
This clause enables the Secretary of the Department
to delegate their powers or functions under the AusCheck scheme to:
-
an SES employee or acting SES employee, or
-
to an APS employee who holds or is acting in an Executive
Level 2 or equivalent position in the Department.
A person to whom such a delegation is made is obliged
to exercise those powers or functions in compliance with any directions
given by the Secretary.
This confirms that the collection, use and disclosure
of personal information must be for purposes related to giving effect
to the operation of the AusCheck scheme. This is consistent with the
principles of the Privacy Act 1988.
This clause permits the Secretary to establish and
maintain a database of information, including AusCheck scheme personal
information about an individual that relates to the AusCheck scheme.
However, the uses of this information are explicitly
confined, to be used for:
-
carrying out another background check in relation
to that individual under the AusCheck scheme
-
responding to a national security threat, or
-
collecting, correlating and analysing data for intelligence
purposes.
Subclause (3) authorises the use of de-identified information
drawn from the database for the purposes of research, government and/or
industry planning.
Given the breadth, depth and sensitivity of personal
information that is expected to be collected by such a scheme, effective
protection of such information and penalties for unauthorised use and
disclosure are essential.
This clause seeks to offer further protection of information
gathered by AusCheck as part of conducting a background check. It makes
it an offence for a current or past employee of AusCheck to make unauthorised
use or disclosure of information obtained in relation to background
checking. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for 2 years.
Disclosure of information is not permitted unless:
-
it is for the purposes of the AusCheck scheme
-
the person disclosing the information has the consent
of the person to whom the AusCheck scheme personal information relates
-
the disclosure is to the individual to whom the AusCheck
scheme personal information relates, or
-
the information is being given to the Australian
Federal Police for the purpose of the AusCheck scheme.
The defendant has the burden of showing that their
disclosure of information fell into one of the exceptions listed above.
The reason for having a reverse onus of proof is the premium placed
on privacy, and also because a person working for AusCheck would be
familiar with the rules of disclosure and the operation of exceptions.
Hence, it would be much easier for the defendant to prove that the disclosure
fell within an exception than for the prosecution to prove that it did
not.(17)
The Explanatory Memorandum sets out the Privacy Act in
relation to the AusCheck scheme.(18)
Clause 18 provides that the Governor-General may make
regulations in relation to:
-
charges to be made by AusCheck on a cost recovery
basis
-
the review of decisions made under regulations establishing
a specific class of background checks
-
the imposition of penalties of up to 50 penalty units
-
guidelines for background checking, and
-
reviewing the AusCheck scheme.(19)
The centralisation of background checks for aviation
and maritime security cards has been recommended by a number of transport
security reviews. AusCheck will be responsible for ASIC and MSIC background
checks. This will be a significant task given that there are more than
120,000 ASICs and 60,000 MSICs currently in operation.(20)
Any expansion of AusCheck’s role to other background checks should continue
to be monitored by the Parliament.

- Until AusCheck commences its operations, the assessment
of an application for a MSIC or ASIC is to be conducted by the Department
of Transport and Regional Services.
- Explanatory Memorandum, AusCheck Bill 2006,
7 December 2006,
p. 1
- Hon. Philip Ruddock MP,
Attorney-General, ‘Second Reading Speech: AusCheck Bill 2006’,
House of Representatives, Debates, 7
December 2006.
- Prime Minister John Howard,
‘Getting
the Big Things Right’ Government Report Card, National
Security, 8 July 2004.
- Attorney-General’s Department, Draft AusCheck
Cost Recovery Impact Statement April 2007, available at: http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/rwpattach.nsf/VAP/(4341200FE1255EFC59DB7A1770C1D0A5)
~auscheck-cris.pdf/$file/auscheck-cris.pdf, accessed 5
February 2007.
- See An
Independent Review of Airport Security and Policing
for the Government of Australia (the Wheeler Report) pp 67–73.
- See: http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/Organisational_StructureNational_
Security_and_Criminal_JusticeAusCheck
- Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit, Inquiry
into developments in aviation security since the Committee’s June
2004 Report 400: Review of Aviation Security in Australia,
Parliament of Australia, December 2006,
p. 51.
- Attorney-General’s Department, Security Environment
Update, available at: http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurity.nsf/AllDocs
/9EDD156E9DA7C75FCA25716F000C9401?OpenDocument, accessed 5
February 2007.
- Explanatory Memorandum, p. 2.
- Part 2, Clause 8, Subclause (2) AusCheck Bill 2006
- Explanatory Memorandum, p. 4.
- Explanatory Memorandum, p. 4.
- ibid, p. 7
- Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit, op.cit,
p. 52.
- Explanatory Memorandum, p. 7.
- Explanatory Memorandum, p. 9.
- Explanatory Memorandum, p. 10.
- For more information on AusCheck cost recovery,
refer to the
Draft AusCheck Cost Recovery Impact Statement, April 2007, AusCheck,
Attorney-General’s Department.
- Department of Transport and Regional Services, Submission
to the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit Inquiry into developments
in aviation security since June 2004, p. 19. Hon.
Mark Vaile MP, Minister for Transport, ‘MSIC Implementation
1 January 2007’, Press Release,
19 December 2006.
Effi Tomaras
Bronwen Jaggers
7 February 2007
Law and Bills Digest Section
Parliamentary Library
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian
Parliament using information available at the time of production.
The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary
Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Staff are available to discuss the paper's contents
with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of
the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2007
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright
Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library,
other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of
their official duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2007.

|
|