![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
|
| Sydney (Kingsford-Smith) | Sydney West Airport |
| Melbourne (Tullamarine) Airport | Brisbane Airport |
| Perth Airport | Adelaide Airport |
| Sydney Coolangatta Airport | Hobart Airport |
| Sydney Launceston Airport | Alice Springs Airport |
| Sydney Canberra Airport | Darwin Airport
|
| Townsville Airport |
Item 13 is a key provision in the Bill.It inserts a proposed new Part 7A—Sale of certain airports into the Transitional Act.The new Part7A includes sections 44A to 44M, the primary purpose of which is to recognise that certain airports may be sold on a freehold basis in lieu of a long-term lease.As per an ordinary sale of a business enterprise, the sale will involve the transfer to the airport-freehold entity the airport land, certain assets, contracts and liabilities of the Federal Airports Corporation (FAC) associated with that particular airport.Proposed new section 44C enables the Commonwealth to impose a restriction on the subsequent use of the airport land (such as, that the land must be used as an airport).
Proposed new section 44N is an appropriation from the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purposes of the freehold sale process.
Items 18 to 20 recognise that staff of the FAC may be transferred to either an airport-lessee company or to an airport-freehold entity.
Item 29 extends the existing requirement in section 91 of the Transitional Act (the section specifies that Australian Archives must give permission for the transfer of any Commonwealth record held by an airport) to any freehold sale of an airport.
Item 30 excludes from the operation of the proposed Legislative Instruments Act 1997 (still before the Parliament), any declaration made by the Minister concerning the sale of airports.The Minister's declarations include such matters as a declaration as to the FAC's title and interest in land and which entity is successor in law to those title rights and interests.The Minister also declares the amount of consideration payable by an airport purchaser to the Commonwealth for the transfer of title and interests formerly held by the Commonwealth.The effect of the exclusion of the proposed Legislative Instruments Act 1997 primarily means (for the purpose of this airports sale process) that such declarations are not a disallowable instrument.
Remaining items, such as Item 39 and Item 42, cover such matters as the preservation of the accrued entitlements (long service leave) and the preservation of deferred benefits (under the Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Act 1973) of staff transferred to an airport-freehold entity.
Item 2 provides a new definition of a joint-user airport for the Airports Act.The proposed new section 7B expressly recognises that Darwin Airport and Townsville Airport are jointly used by civil and Defence Force operations.For the time being, Canberra Airport is a joint-user airport but the indication at page 23 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill is that a decision will be made in the future to withdraw the Royal Australian Air Force operations from Canberra Airport.To accommodate this development (should it occur), the proposed new section provides authority for a Regulation to be made to change the status of Canberra Airport.Conversely, Regulations can be made to declare another airport to be a joint-user airport.
Items 4 and 5 have the effect of streamlining the Minister's power to approve airport management agreements with an airport operator under section 33 of the Airports Act.It is superfluous to require the Minister to frame approvals on the basis that he or she is satisfied that the airport-operator company is not foreign controlled.This is because Part 3 of the Airports Act already specifies that an airport-operator must not be in an unacceptable foreign-ownership situation (i.e. the presence of foreign ownership of more than 49% of the airport-operator company—see section 40 of the Airports Act).
Items 11 and 13 have the effect of making a determination by the Minister, that a specified agreement is an approved airport-management agreement, a disallowable instrument.
Item 22 expands the existing section 192 of the Airports Act.Section 192 brings airports within the third party access regime under the National Competition Policy provisions contained in the Trade Practices Act 1974.Essentially, the regime opens-up significant infrastructure to broader-based competition.The proposed amendments enable the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) to issue written determinations which specify whether a particular service, use or facility falls within the scope of an 'airport service' for the purposes of section 192.The ACCC determination is a disallowable instrument.
Item 25 excludes from review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal a range of decisions made by the Minister connected with the approval, or refusal to approve, airport master plans or major development plans or environmental strategies for airports.The reason for the exclusion of this administrative review of the merits of the Minister's decision is stated in the Minister's Second Reading speech as justified on the grounds that the development of such plans and strategies requires public consultation and, further, the Minister is required to table a statement in Parliament about his or her decisions (see also, Item 27, which expands the class of statements to be tabled in Parliament).(4)
These three items are simple consequential amendments to recognise that the sale of certain federal airports is now offered on a freehold basis.Previously, the sale of the airports was on a long-term lease basis, only.The proposed amendments are to the FAC Act.
The extension of the options for sale of airports to include freehold sale of specified federal airports appears to have been directed at attracting interest from the States and the Northern Territory.As noted above, that interest does not appear to have materialised.Taken overall, this sale program of federal airports is reported to be the largest airport asset sale of its type in the world.(5)
Brendan Bailey
10 October 1997
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 1997
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1997.
This page was prepared by the Parliamentary Library, Commonwealth of
Australia
Last updated: 13 October 1997