Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 4 1999-2000

Preference Flows at the 1998 House of Representatives Election

Gerard Newman
Statistics Group
31 August 1999

Introduction

This Research Note examines the significance of preferences in determining the electoral result and utilises data available for the first time to accurately determine the direction of minor party and independent preferences.1

At the 1998 House of Representatives election support for the major parties (Australian Labor Party and the Coalition partners) fell to below 80 per cent for the first time. The increase in support for the minor parties and independent candidates resulted in a substantial increase in the number of Electoral Divisions where the result was determined by the distribution of preferences. At the 1998 election preferences were required to be distributed in two-thirds of the Divisions compared with 44 per cent at the 1996 election.

The question of which of the major parties has benefited most from the preferences of minor parties and independents has been the subject of discussion since the introduction of preferential voting in 1918.

In the modern era of Australian politics (post-1949) there has been a considerable shift in the direction of minor party preferences. In the 1950s and 1960s, the Coalition parties were the clear beneficiary of minor party preferences largely thanks to the Democratic Labor Party (DLP). The demise of the DLP and the advent of new centre-orientated parties in the 1970s resulted in the advantage enjoyed by the Coalition being substantially reduced. This trend has continued to such an extent that by the 1980s and early 1990s the Australian Labor Party enjoyed a substantial advantage.

Aggregate Preferences

In 1984 the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 was changed so that a two-party preferred vote figure (ALP/Coalition) could be calculated in all Electoral Divisions. Data from this process allows the calculation of the difference between the aggregate first preference vote figure for the major parties and the two-party preferred vote figure to show what proportion of preferences the major parties received.

Table 1 shows the difference between the first preference votes and the two-party preferred vote for the major parties at each House of Representatives since 1984.

In the elections held in the 1980s and early 90s the Labor Party was the clear beneficiary of the aggregate preferences of minor parties and independents. However, in the last two elections the Coalition has been able to reduce the advantage enjoyed by the Labor Party with the 1998 result being the most even of the past six elections.

The Labor Party enjoyed an advantage over the Coalition at the 1998 election in being able to win more seats than the Coalition after being behind on first preference votes. Labor won four seats (Bass, Kingston, McMillan and Stirling) after trailing the Coalition on first preferences while the Coalition was able to only win one seat (Hinkler) after trailing the Labor Party.

Party Preferences

While it is clear from the above that the Labor Party has been the main beneficiary of minor party and independent preferences overall in recent elections, what has not been clear is the support from individual minor parties and independents. Prior to the 1998 election empirical evidence was not available on the direction of individual minor party or independent preferences. In respect of the 1998 election the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), for the first time, has made available data that allows for the calculation of the direction of minor party and independent preferences. This data is summarised in Table 2.

The table shows, for each party contesting the 1998 House of Representatives election, the number of first preference votes the party received and the percentage of those votes that flowed to the Labor Party and to the Coalition when the party's preferences were distributed. All parties and independent candidates are included in the table except for those in Divisions where there was not an ALP/Coalition final contest (Calare, Blair, Mayo and Newcastle).

While the data in the table generally confirms conventional wisdom regarding the direction of minor preferences, some interesting trends emerge.

  • The Coalition partners (in three-cornered contests) heavily favoured each other.
  • One Nation favoured the Coalition (53.62%) but not by the margin that was predicted before the election.
  • Parties of the 'left' favoured the Labor Party (Greens-73.28%, Democratic Socialist Party-73.51%, Progressive Labor Party-91.40%, Socialist Equity Party-54.99%).
  • Parties of the 'right' generally favoured the Coalition (Christian Democratic Party-65.32%, Australia First Party-50.57%, Australian Shooters Party-57.66%), although not always (Citizens Electoral Council-45.15%, Tasmania First Party-41.97%).
  • Labor also benefited from the more centre-orientated parties (Democrats-56.69%, Unity-79.63%, Natural Law Party-56.21%, Australian Women's Party-66.90%).
  • Single issue parties also generally favoured the Labor Party (No Aircraft Noise-52.49%, Abolish Child Support-55.60%, Republican Party-61.54%).
  • Independent preferences favoured the Coalition (53.71%), a result distorted by votes for the two former Liberal members in Western Australia.
  1. This Research Note is based on data to be published by the Australian Electoral Commission in the forthcoming CD-ROM version of the 1998 Election results.

 

top