Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme
On 16 July 2008 the Minister
for Climate Change and Water, Senator
Wong released the government's Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme Green Paper.
This document outlined the government's
initial thinking on the establishment of
an Australian emissions
trading scheme (ETS).
On 15 December 2008, the government
released its White Paper entitled Carbon
Pollution Reduction Scheme—Australia’s
Low Pollution Future. This document
sets out the Australian Government's decisions
on the design and operation of a proposed
Australian ETS. The features of the proposed
ETS were based on the abovementioned Green
Paper, reactions to that document, further
consultation with affected parties and the
Garnaut
Climate Change Review.
The key features of the proposed Australian
ETS are set out in the White Paper's Summary
of Policy Decisions.
On 4 May 2009 the Government announced changes to the key policy decisions set out in the above mentioned White Paper. These changes delayed the start date of the scheme, increased the compensation for affected industries and increased the medium term target for the reduction of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions by 2020.
ISSUES AND ARGUMENT
The Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 (CPRS Bill) was introduced to Parliament on 14 May 2009. It passed through the House of Representatives on 4 June and was introduced into the Senate on 15 June 2009. The major features of the Bill now before the Senate are summarised below.
Commencement date
Targets
Trajectory
Coverage
Exemptions
Basis of operation
Number of AEUs issued/auctioned
AEU price cap
Market information
Penalties and compliance
International linkages
Assistance and compensation
Assistance with coal fired power generators
Voluntary action
Independent review
Comparison with other schemes
Commencement date
The proposed scheme will commence on 1 July 2011 and operate on an Australian financial year basis (1 July to 30 June in the following calendar year).
Targets
The overall aim is to contribute to stabilising the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere at 450 parts per million (ppm). No date was set for the achievement of this aim. The Garnaut Climate Change Review suggested that this overall objective be reached by 2100.
The initial target is to reduce Australia’s annual GHG emissions by five per cent of 2000 levels by 2020, if no overall global agreement to reduce these emissions is reached.
If a global agreement to reduce GHG emissions is reached, including all major economies, then Australia will aim to reduce its annual GHG emissions by up to fifteen per cent of 2000 emissions levels by 2020.
If a comprehensive global agreement is reached, including both developed and developing countries, consistent with the long-term stabilisation of atmospheric GHG concentrations at 450 ppm, then Australia will aim to reduce its annual GHG emissions by up to twenty-five per cent of 2000 emissions levels by 2020.
The government has previously noted that its overall goal is to reduce Australia's GHG emissions by 60 per cent of 2000 levels by 2050. This overall target was repeated in the CPRS Bill.
Australia’s GHG emissions were 552.7 million tonnes (Mt) of CO2 in 2000 according to the emissions accounting rules for the Kyoto Protocol. The government has not explicitly stated which accounting rules its emissions reduction targets will be based upon, but presumably if a global agreement is reached then the accounting rules associated with that agreement will be used for Australia’s domestic targets. Using the Kyoto accounting rules as a guide, the targets to which Australia’s GHG emissions must be reduced are approximately:
- between 525.0 Mt CO2(at five per cent reduction on 2000 levels) and 414.5 Mt CO2 (at 25 per cent reduction on 2000 levels) emissions in 2020, and
- 221.1 Mt CO2 in 2050 (at 60 per cent reduction on 2000 levels in 2020).
TOP OF PAGE
Trajectory
The trajectory of any emissions control regime is the rate at which GHG emissions are reduced. Following is the indicative emissions trajectory for the Australian ETS:
- 109 per cent of 2000 GHG emissions in 2010–11 (602.6 Mt)
- 108 per cent of 2000 levels in 2011–12 (597.0 Mt)
- 107 per cent of 2000 levels in 2012–13 (559.5 Mt).
The specific trajectory for a given year will be announced a year in advance.
Each following year's trajectory will lie within a declared range. This range of possible annual trajectories will be declared for five years, in advance. That is, the upper and lower limits on each year's range of possible trajectories will be declared for the five following years. The trajectory for each annual period will be reviewed each year. There will be a strategic review of the scheme's range of annual trajectories every five years.
The government reserves the right to adjust the scheme's trajectory as circumstances change.
Coverage
The proposed ETS will cover all six GHGs mentioned in Annex I to the Kyoto Protocol from its commencement (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, sulphur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons).
Generally, the proposed ETS direct obligations will apply to entities (i.e. companies, trusts, partnerships and the like) with a facility that emits at least 25 000 tonnes of the above gases per year. All major industrial sectors will be included in the scheme.
Initially the scheme will cover about 75 per cent of Australian GHG emissions.
Exemptions
Exemptions will apply to the following areas.
-
The rural sector will
not be included in the scheme. The government
is disposed to include the rural sector
directly in the scheme in 2015, but a
final decision will not be made on this
matter until 2013.
-
GHG emissions from
the combustion of biofuels and biomass
for energy, including emissions from the
combustion of methane from waste landfill
facilities, will not be included in the
scheme.
-
Emissions from landfill
sites closed prior to 30 June 2008
will not be covered by the scheme.
-
Forestry and deforestation
are not included in the proposed scheme.
Forestry operators may choose to be included
in the scheme.
-
Emissions credits
created in the voluntary emissions trading
market that are not Kyoto protocol compliant
will not be covered by the scheme. Transitional
measures will be implemented for emissions
credits raised under the New South Wales
Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme and the
Queensland Gas Scheme.
TOP OF PAGE
Basis of operation
Scheme participants will be required to purchase the necessary number of Australian Emissions Units (AEU) to cover their emissions. Each AEU will cover the emission of one tonne of carbon dioxide or its equivalent in terms of the global warming potential of the GHGs emitted.
Enough AEUs (or an equivalent number of international emissions credits—see below) covering a participant’s annual emissions must be surrendered by 15 December following the end of the preceding financial year. The first surrender of units will occur on 15 December 2012.
During the first year of operation (2011-2012) an unlimited number of permits will be sold at a fixed price of $10 per unit. After the first year of fixed permit prices, each directly covered participant will be required to purchase the necessary number of AEUs via an auction (save those who are eligible for direct assistance or compensation—see below). Auctions will be held monthly. Auctions are to commence in 2010–2011 for the 2012–2013 year.
The AEUs bought at auction will be personal property with no limit on parties who may hold them (i.e. investment banks and individuals may buy and hold these permits and later sell them on a secondary market). These permits may also be banked (that is, held over for use in later years). However, fixed price permits from the first year of the scheme’s operation cannot be ‘banked’ or saved for use in later years.
Liable entities may borrow up to five per cent of their current year’s obligations from the next year’s entitlement. However, they have to ‘make good’ or repay this borrowed amount.
Free AEUs will also be issued in relation to participating eligible reforestation projects and the destruction of synthetic greenhouse gases. Should they choose to participate, forestry operators may begin to accumulate AEUs in relation to carbon stored in forestry projects from 1 July 2010.
Individual emittersmay request the cancellation of their AEUs and other emissions units. Alternatively, this may be done through the proposed Australian Carbon Trust (see below). Such requests will be granted providing they do not breach either the Regulations or Kyoto Protocol rules.
Number of AEUs issued/auctioned
The annual number of permits either issued or auctioned will be closely related to the annual emissions trajectories noted above.
TOP OF PAGE
AEU price cap
Scheme participants will have to pay the market price for permits from 1 July 2012 subject to the following price caps. In 2012–13, an AEU’s price will not be above $40 plus five per cent real growth for each of the years 2010–11 and 2011–12. The proportional increase in the price cap is known as the indexation factor. In each of the three years thereafter, the price cap will rise by this indexation factor for that particular year, applied to the previous year’s price. The price cap for a particular year will apply until 15 December of the compliance year, and caps will cease on 15 December 2016.
The government will sell an unlimited amount of permits at the price cap to liable entities only. The permits sold under these arrangements cannot be resold or banked. They are automatically surrendered after issue and can only be used to acquit that entity’s liability for that year.
Market information
The the Australian Climate Change Regulatory Authority (the Authority) will be required to release market relevant information on the supply of AEUs and liable entities’ requirements for these units in a timely manner.
Penalties and compliance
The scheme's governing body, the Authority, will be provided with a range of compliance, anti–avoidance, investigative and enforcement powers and a range of mechanisms, including civil penalty and criminal provisions, to respond variously to non–compliance with the CPRS. Directors and officers of a company found to be in breach of certain provisions of the proposed CPRS Act may also be fined. Fraudulent conduct in relation to the issuing of AEUs, may result in the offender being required to relinquish those units (see Part 13 of the CPRS Bill). Anti–avoidance provisions are also proposed in relation to the exemptions from liability for small facilities (generally, those emitting less than 25 000 tonnes of CO2 per year). These are designed to capture entities that pursue artificial means to keep their facilities below this threshold so as to avoid CPRS liability.
A limited financial penalty will apply if the required number of emissions units is not surrendered to the Authority by the appropriate time. In the first years (2011–2012) this penalty will be $11 per unit. The penalty in later years will be fixed by regulation but will be limited to no more than 110 per cent of the average auction price for the particular financial year. Thus, liable entities have an incentive to buy any necessary units through a secondary market rather than simply paying a penalty if they do not surrender enough AEUs. These penalties will not be tax deductible.
TOP OF PAGE
International linkages
The proposed scheme will allow the acceptance
of the following Kyoto
Protocol emissions credits to acquit
emissions obligations:
-
Certified Emission
Reduction Units (CER) generated under
the Clean Development Mechanism (but not
temporary or long term CERs).
-
Emission Removal Units
generated under the Joint Implementation
Mechanism.
-
Removal Units (RMU).
Some limits apply on the acceptance of
these Kyoto Protocol units. Notably, an Assigned Amount Unit (AAU) arising under the Kyoto Protocol will not be accepted for CPRS purposes.
International non-Kyoto units (such as units meeting the ‘Gold Standard’) will not be accepted for compliance in the Scheme for the period from 2010–11 to 2012–13. This position will be reviewed for the period after 2012–13 in the light of future developments in international negotiations.
The sale and transfer of Australian permits to international markets will not be permitted in the initial years of the scheme.
Initially, the proposed Australian scheme will not be linked with any other ETS, such as New Zealand's or the European Union's. This position may change in later years.
TOP OF PAGE
Assistance and compensation
Emissions Intensive Trade Exposed Industries
(EITE) will receive either:
-
94.5 per cent of required emissions permits free of charge, for activities that have an emissions intensity above 2000 tonnes CO2 per million dollars in revenue or 6000 tonnes CO2 per million dollars value added in the specific assessment period, or
-
66 per cent of required emissions permits free of charge, for activities that have an emissions intensity between 1000 tonnes CO2 and 1999 tonnes CO2 per million dollars of revenue or between 3000 and 5999 tonnes CO2 per million dollars value added in the specific assessment period.
In February 2009, the Department of Climate Change released a Guidance Paper to aid in the Assessment of activities for the purposes of the emissions-intensive trade-exposed assistance program.
About 25 per cent of the total pool of permits will be allocated to EITE industries, rising over time with EITE sector growth. There will be no upper limit on the share of free permits provided to EITE industries. Rates of assistance will decline by 1.3 per cent per year from the second year onwards.
Strongly affected industries may receive either:
- direct financial assistance, or
- a one-off allocation of emissions permits free of charge.
A Climate Change Action Fund will be established to ease transition costs for businesses, community sector organisations, workers, regions and communities changing to an operating environment that includes a price on carbon.
Fuel excise and other taxes will be reduced to take account of the impact of the proposed ETS on fuels.
Low and middle income households, and social security benefit and pension recipients will received additional payments to offset the impact of the proposed ETS on utilities bills.
TOP OF PAGE
Assistance for coal fired power generators
The coal fired power generation industry will receive assistance contingent on whether individual facilities pass a power system reliability test and/or whether individual facilities will make windfall profits in the 2013–2014 or 2014–2015 years. Such assistance will be available for five years after the commencement of the CPRS (that is, up until the financial year commencing 1 July 2016).
Voluntary action
An Australian Carbon Trust will be established comprising a $50 million Energy Efficiency Trust and a $25.8 million Energy Efficiency Savings Pledge Fund. A particular feature of assistance available through the Energy Efficiency Trust is that it will provide loans for businesses to undertake energy efficiency measures. These loans would be repaid from the energy savings achieved by this investment. Under the proposed Savings Pledge Fund, individuals can calculate their savings from their investment in energy efficiency measures and buy/retire AEUs from the scheme. Contributions to the Savings Pledge Fund will be tax deductible. Further, purchases of power from renewable sources (i.e. ‘Green Power’) will be recognised under the proposed scheme. Limits on the annual issue of AEUs will be reduced in recognition of voluntary purchases of Green Power above 2009 levels.
Independent review
An independent expert advisory committee will periodically undertake a public review of the CPRS.
TOP OF PAGE
Comparison with other schemes
The proposed carbon pollution reduction
scheme has several features in common with
other emissions trading schemes around the
world, most notably the European
Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). The
common elements are:
-
-
Both schemes introduce
emissions trading to their respective
areas gradually.
- The EU ETS achieved this by limiting
the number of sectors covered initially,
freely allocating about 95 per
cent of emission permits and initially
only dealing with one of the six main
Kyoto Protocol greenhouse gases—carbon
dioxide.
- The proposed Australian scheme achieves
this by initially allocating about 25 per
cent of emissions permits free of charge,
compensating significantly affected
industries and individuals and aiming
to achieve initially modest reductions in GHG
emissions.
-
Both schemes will
expand coverage and the economic impact
of the scheme over time.
- The EU ETS now includes additional
countries compared with the scheme's
commencement in 2005, and will include
additional sectors, such as the transport
and aviation industries, additional
greenhouse gases and smaller emitters.
The number of emissions permits will
be reduced over time and the number
of permits allocated by auction will
increase over time.
- The Australian scheme will reduce
the number of permits allocated over
time and assistance to Strongly Affected
Industries and individuals will reduce
over time. Additional sectors may also
be included, such as agriculture and
smaller emitters.
-
Both schemes may eventually
link to other emissions trading schemes
if various problems can be overcome.
-
Both schemes do not,
for the time being, include the agricultural
sector as emissions from this sector are
too hard to measure with the degree of
accuracy required for emissions trading.
However, the proposed Australian CPRS is arguably in
'advance' of other
emissions trading schemes in some areas:
- It will formally cover the six major Kyoto Protocol greenhouse gases from the commencement of the scheme.
- It covers a wider number of sectors, for example the domestic transport sector from 1 July 2011.
That said, the proposed US emissions trading scheme, covers a larger number of gases, and potentially a wider range of economic sectors, than the Australian scheme.
A significant difference between the proposed
Australian ETS and the EU ETS is that the
former has an emissions permit price limit.
The EU ETS has no such limits.
Further, the proposed Australian ETS will
accept both a greater quantity and wider
range of Kyoto Protocol emissions credits
than the EU ETS.
Australia is in a different position to
the EU and other schemes in that:
-
The Commonwealth is
in a comparatively far stronger position
legally under the Constitution in setting
up a national emissions trading scheme
than the European Commission was in implementing
the EU ETS.
- The European Commission had to deal
with over 20 sovereign states representing
their separate points of view in the
European Parliament. Though sovereign
in their respective spheres the Australian
states are not sovereign in respect
of nation-wide economic policy such
as taxes, and so on.
-
Australia is not the
first country to implement such a large
scale emissions trading scheme—it
can learn from others' mistakes.
- One example of this is that Australia
has aimed to accurately measure emissions
well before the commencement of the
trading scheme. In Europe, emissions
measurement commenced the year the emissions
trading scheme started. In the EU, emissions
trading was operating under a very ill-informed
market until mid 2006 when comprehensive
emissions data first became available
and it was clear the EU emissions market
was oversupplied with emission permits.
-
The proposed CPRS comes at the
end of a number of public reports and
considerable public debate. In comparison,
the EU introduced its scheme in haste,
without significant public debate, and
only after a considerable period of favouring
the alternative approach of carbon
taxes.
Department of Climate Change, Carbon pollution reduction scheme green paper, Australian Government, 16 July 2008.
Department of Climate Change, Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme—Australia’s Low Pollution Future, Australian Government, 15 December 2008.
L. Nielson, The European emissions trading system—lessons for Australia, Research paper, no. 3, 2007–08, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 20 August 2008.
L. Nielson, Emissions—who is trading what?, Background note, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 15 August 2008.
N. Markovic and N. Fuller, Climate change discussions and negotiations: a calendar, Background note, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 26 August 2008.
L. Nielson, J Styles, A. Talberg and J. Tomaras, Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme 2009, Bills Digest, No. 165, 2008–2009, 15 June 2009, Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
12 August, 2009 Comments to:
web.library@aph.gov.au
Last reviewed
12 August, 2009
by the Parliamentary Library Web Manager
© Commonwealth of Australia
Parliament of Australia
Web Site Privacy Statement
Images courtesy of AUSPIC
DNR08 |