Skip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - House of RepresentativesPhoto of the House of Representatives Chamber
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Annual Report 2004–05

Appendices

1 Performance information

The following tables summarise the performance of the Department of the House of Representatives in 2004–05.

Summary of overall performance in relation to Outcome 1, 2004–05

Outcome 1: The House of Representatives fulfils its role as a representative and legislative body

Intermediate outcome: Chamber and Main Committee operate effectively
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Number of sittings of the House and Main Committee The House sat on 51 occasions (78 occasions)
The Main Committee met on 31 occasions (46 occasions)
Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Hours of sitting The House sat for 493 hours including suspensions (e.g. overnight during an extended sitting) or 467 hours excluding suspensions (743 hours including suspensions or 695 hours excluding suspensions)
The Main Committee met for 151 hours including suspensions or 123 hours excluding suspensions (172 hours including suspensions or 154 hours excluding suspensions)
Legislation processed
  • number of bills
  • number of amendments
215 (195) bills (including those received from the Senate) were introduced and 139 (191) passed both Houses and were assented to
7 bills originating in the House and 15 bills received from the Senate (24 bills) were amended by the House of Representatives
11 (53) bills were amended by the Senate and agreed to by the House of Representatives

Note: Comparable performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

top

Intermediate outcome: Community understanding of, and interaction with, the work of the House of Representatives and the Commonwealth Parliament
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Increased community awareness and involvement We received visits from 111,261 students from 3,312 schools (108,367 students from 3,193 schools).
602 persons (695 persons) attended seminars (fewer seminars held due to the election period).
Two issues (five issues) of About the House magazine were published (fewer issues published due to the election period).
Fortnightly advertisements about the work of the House and committees were placed in The Australian.
Trends over time

Note: Comparable performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Intermediate outcome: An operating system of parliamentary committees
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Number of committees 30 (31) Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Number of committee meetings 490 (929)
Hours of committee meetings 732 (1,574)
Number of committee reports presented 62 (119)

Note: Comparable performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets

top

Intermediate outcome: Maintain international and regional relationships with other parliaments, parliamentary bodies and organisations
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Number of official and unofficial visits to Australia There were 11 (14) official and 27 (34) unofficial parliamentary delegation visits to Australia from overseas parliaments. Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Level of participation in parliamentary organisations Of eligible senators and members,
56 per cent (50 per cent) were members of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA), while 74 eligible former senators and members were life members of the CPA and 2 were associate members.
Of eligible senators and members,
77 per cent (77 per cent) were members of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.
Of eligible senators and members,
36 per cent (36 per cent) were members of the Asia Pacific Parliamentary Forum.
The degree of focus on priority areas of Australia’s bilateral relationships within the visit programs 22 visits were from countries in the Asia–Pacific region and four visits were from the United States of America. Evaluation taking account of advice received from the departments of Foreign Affairs and Trade and Prime Minister and Cabinet
Level of activity with regard to training for parliamentary staff from overseas parliaments The department maintained its support for training and development of colleagues from other parliaments. The most significant input into training of parliamentary staff from overseas was the 2004 Interparliamentary Study Program which had participants from 11 countries. Departmental staff also supported training for staff associated with parliaments such as the Vietnam National Assembly, the House of Representatives of Thailand, and Tanzania. Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle

Note: Comparable performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Intermediate outcome: Members receive approved services to fulfil their
parliamentary duties
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Members satisfied that support services enable them to fulfil their parliamentary duties All members (19 in total) participating in the Members’ Survey 2005 were asked if they were satisfied overall with the support services they received from the department to help them fulfil their parliamentary duties. Members were unanimously satisfied with the department’s support in this regard and complimented the professionalism and courtesy of staff.
The response to the 2005 Survey was identical to the results from last year’s survey.
Trends over time

Note: Comparable performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Summary of performance in relation to administered items, 2004–05

Administered item: Members’ salaries and allowances
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality: All variations and salary increases are processed with an accuracy rate of at least 99 per cent All variations and salary increases were processed with an accuracy rate of at least 99 per cent (99 per cent). Target is to be met
Quantity: 150 payments processed monthly with an annual budget of $21.859 million 1,846 (1,800) payments were processed for the year at a cost of $5.49 ($5.41) per transaction.
1 (one) pay increase was processed.
Salary and allowance expenses for members were $21.15 million ($20.79 million).

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

top

Administered item: Citizenship Visits Program
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality: Subsidy payments are processed within seven days of receiving payment request Subsidy payments were processed within two days (two days) of receiving a completed payment request. Target is to be met
Quantity: 14,000 student visitors with an annual subsidy budget of $0.59 million (Senate contribution of $0.59 million) 18,741 eligible student visitors were subsidised, at an average subsidy payment of $70 per student (18,190 students at an average of $67.18)—costs were shared with the Department of the Senate.
Total expenses were $1.30 million.

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Administered item: Holders of Public Office
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality: All variations are processed with less than a 1 per cent error rate All variations were processed with an accuracy rate of 99 per cent (99 per cent). Target is to be met
Quantity: 7 average staffing level (ASL) with an annual salary budget of $0.62 million 5.33 ASL (5.72 ASL) at an average of $87,880 ($80,100) per ASL.
Total expenses of $0.25 million ($0.54 million) were expended on termination payments to staff who discontinued their service following the federal election.

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Summary of performance in relation to each output, 2004–05

Output Group 1.1: Chamber and Main Committee
Output: Advice and services to enable the Chamber and Main Committee to meet and address business as scheduled
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality 1: Members and others are highly satisfied with the advice and services provided by Clerks at the Table 100 per cent (94 per cent – the remainder were ‘not applicable’) of members surveyed were satisfied with advice and service provision; 89 per cent (88 per cent) were ‘extremely’ or ‘highly’ satisfied. Trends over time, measured through formal and informal feedback
Quality 2: Members and others are highly satisfied with the quality and timeliness of the following support services:
  • provision of documents of the House (including bills)
  • programming and procedural advice
  • questions on notice
  • presentation of petitions
100 per cent (93 per cent – the remainder were not applicable) of members surveyed were satisfied with the quality and timeliness of support services; 79 per cent (87 per cent) were ‘extremely’ or ‘highly’ satisfied. Trends over time, measured through formal and informal feedback
Quantity: Hours sat by House and Main Committee The House sat for 467 (695) hours.
The Main Committee met for 123 (154) hours.
Trends over time
Output: Processing and drafting of bills
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality 1: Processing deadlines met with no errors All deadlines were met and there were no significant errors (as in 2003–04). Trends over time
Quality 2: Members are satisfied that drafting meets their intentions in a timely way All members surveyed who had used legislative and drafting services were satisfied with advice and service provision
(as in 2003–04).
Trends over time, measured through formal and informal feedback
Quantity 1: Number of bills processed to third reading/assent stage within deadlines 100 per cent (100 per cent). Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Quantity 2: Number of bills/amendments drafted within timeframe required 100 per cent (100 per cent). Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Output: Creating and processing the records and papers of the parliament
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality: Votes officer’s minutes for House and Main Committee accurate and current to within five minutes The minutes were accurate and available through the parliamentary computing network, current to within five minutes on all occasions. Trends over time
Quantity: Number of documents and disallowable instruments processed 15,637 (4,101 a) Trends over time
Output: Collection, analysis and publication of procedural and statistical information
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality 1: Accuracy and relevance of information; timeliness of information Informal feedback and statements made in the House indicate a high level of satisfaction with the information provided. Trends over time, measured through formal and informal feedback
Quality 2: Quality of publications Internal and external users indicated a high level of satisfaction with the new standing orders, updated Infosheets and the 5th edition of House of Representatives Practice. Trends over time, measured through formal and informal feedback
Total price for 1.1: $4.12 million $3.14 million ($0.54 million)  

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

a The figure of 4,101 has been revised to include papers tabled during debate, which were not included in the figure of 3,549 reported in the 2003–04 Annual Report.

top

Output Group 1.2: Community awareness
Output: Services to increase public knowledge and awareness of, and interaction with, the work of the House of Representatives and the Commonwealth Parliament
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality 1: 90 per cent of participants completing seminar evaluations are satisfied with the seminar program Each seminar conducted received an overall rating of ‘extremely satisfied’ from seminar participants who completed evaluations. Seminar evaluations, trends over time
Quality 2: Quality of publications There was an increase in subscriptions to around 15,000 (14,000 in 2003–04). Positive feedback was received through telephone calls and e-mails from readers. About the House magazine survey, trends over time
Quantity 1: Number of people subscribing to email alert service 1,400 (950) individuals and organisations Trends over time
Quantity 2: Number of student visitors 111,261 (108,367) student visitors Trends over time
Total price for 1.2: $1.13 million $1.27 million ($1.41 million)  

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Output Group 1.3: Committee services
Output: Procedural, research, analytical and administrative support for the conduct of inquiries and other activities of committees and the publication of the final report
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality: Rate of satisfaction of committee members with advice and services provided through discussions with and surveys of key clients 89 per cent (94 per cent) of members surveyed were ‘satisfied’ to ‘extremely satisfied’ with the general non-inquiry support provided by the Committee Office. Trends over time measured through formal and informal feedback
Quantity: Number of full year inquiries completed per year 40 (47) full year equivalent committee inquiries were conducted. Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Total price for 1.3: $10.73 million $9.35 million ($2.03 million)  

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Output group 1.4: Interparliamentary relations
Output: Advice and support to facilitate the conduct of the Parliament’s international and regional affairs
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality 1: Rate of satisfaction of delegates with regard to arrangements for overseas visits by Australian parliamentary delegations All outgoing parliamentary delegations were debriefed after their visits. Satisfaction with the visit programs was high. Feedback on administrative arrangements assisted with improvements to the effectiveness of visits. Representatives from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and other relevant agencies were invited to the debrief meetings. Trends over time and surveys from debriefing meetings with delegates and other stakeholders
Quality 2: Rate of satisfaction of Presiding Officers with arrangements for incoming parliamentary delegations, participation in parliamentary organisations and quality of policy advice Feedback from the Presiding Officers in relation to visit programs, participation in parliamentary organisations and the quality of policy advice was positive. Feedback from Presiding Officers
Quality 3: Rate of satisfaction of delegates with arrangements for incoming parliamentary delegations Positive feedback was received on the quality and conduct of programs for incoming delegations. Feedback was sought from delegates and their diplomatic missions in Australia. Feedback and surveys from diplomatic representatives in Australia and Australian diplomatic missions overseas
Quality 4: Timeliness of provision of passport and visa services All passports and visas were provided within required timeframes. Trends over time
Total price for 1.4: $1.92 million $1.98 million ($2.03 million)  

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

Output Group 1.5: Members’ services
Output: Services and advice to members
Performance indicator Performance How measured
Quality: High level of client satisfaction—number of clients satisfied with services and advice received—measured through surveys or by direct feedback 95 per cent (100 per cent) of members surveyed were satisfied with services provided; 84 per cent (74 per cent) were ‘extremely’ or ‘highly’ satisfied. Trends over time, measured through formal and informal feedback
Quantity: Number of accommodation-related services provided to members 283 (298) routine maintenance requests were actioned.
The target for emergency requests was ‘action within five minutes’; this target was reached in relation to 100 per cent (100 per cent) of the 359 (351) emergency requests received.
Furniture movement requests targets are set at three levels:
Priority 1 within three hours–93
Priority 2 within 12 hours–108
Priority 3 within 24 hours–78
Priority 4 within two to five days–320
Total–599 (518).
All were processed within the agreed timeframes.
2,750 (4,800) transport requests were processed with 99 per cent accuracy.
Trends over time, taking into account the parliamentary cycle
Total price for 1.5: $3.55 million $3.17 million ($2.30 million)  

Note: Performance information for 2003–04, where available, is shown in brackets.

 

top