Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - House of RepresentativesPhoto of the House of Representatives Chamber
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Annual Report 2002–03

You are currently viewing: Annual report > Appendices > Appendix 1
< - previous : next ->

Appendices

1  Performance information

The following tables summarise the performance of the Department of the House of Representatives in 2002–03.

Table 10  Summary of overall performance in relation to Outcome 1, 2002–03
Outcome 1:  The House of Representatives fulfils its role as a representative and legislative body
Performance indicator: Chamber and Main Committee operate effectively
Measure Performance
Number of sittings of the House and Main Committee The House sat on 73 occasions (53 occasions) involving 696 hours including suspensions (e.g. meal breaks) or 659 hours excluding suspensions (507 hours including suspensions or 465 hours excluding suspensions)
Hours of sittings The Main Committee met on 47 occasions (31 occasions) involving 223 hours including suspensions or 186 hours excluding suspensions (117 hours including suspensions or 99 hours excluding suspensions)
Legislation processed
  • number of bills
  • number of amendments
203 (214) bills were introduced and 160 (143) passed both Houses and were assented to

28 (34) bills were amended by the House of Representatives

32 (32) bills were amended by the Senate and agreed to by the House of Representatives
Performance indicator: Committees fulfil their role in the parliamentary consideration of policy and legislation and the scrutiny of government
Measure Performance
Percentage of committee recommendations reflected in amendments to government policy and administration Legislation introduced and government responses to committee reports presented revealed that, in subjects as diverse as the education of boys and stem cell research, recognition of the contribution of committees and the acceptance of recommendations was high
Performance indicator: Members receive approved services to fulfil their parliamentary duties in a secure and accessible environment
Measure Performance
Members satisfied that support and security services enable them to fulfil their parliamentary duties In the survey of members 95 per cent of survey participants were at least satisfied with the security services with 50 per cent being extremely or highly satisfied

Members indicated that they were comfortable with changes to internal security arrangements affecting them

However, a number of members felt the security barriers that had been erected were excessive and discouraged public access
Ratio of persons involved in incidents compared to the number of visitors to Parliament House A total of 1.02 million visitors (1.13 million) passed through the security screening procedures at the main public entrance

The following other totals were achieved in relation to security:
  • visitor passes processed – 86,919 (84,080)
  • function passes issued – 38,143 (29,781)
  • protests, incidents or events monitored – 138 (42)
  • major incidents contained – 0 (3)
  • exclusions made and weapons prohibited – 15,200 (10,720)
  • weapons confiscated – 17 (11)
  • policy advice items provided – 68 (65)
Performance indicator: Productive and amicable international and regional relationships with other parliaments, parliamentary bodies and organisations
Measure Performance
Percentage of memberships of relevant parliamentary organisations Of eligible senators and members, 74 per cent (73 per cent) were members of the Inter-Parliamentary Union

Of eligible senators and members, 47 per cent (43 per cent) were members of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA), while 80 eligible former senators and members were life members of the CPA

Of eligible senators and members, 37 per cent (36 per cent) were members of the Asia–Pacific Parliamentary Forum
Number and trends in official invitations for bilateral visits to and from the Parliament of Australia At the end of the year, the following invitations were outstanding:
  • incoming – 47 (43)
  • outgoing – 30 (12)
Performance indicator: Community understanding of, and interaction with, the work of the House of Representatives and the Commonwealth Parliament
Measure Performance
Increased community awareness and involvement We received visits from 106,349 students from 3,165 schools (106,511 students from 3,173 schools)

470 persons (440 persons) attended seminars

Five issues (three issues) of About the House magazine were published

Fortnightly advertisements about the work of the House and committees were placed in The Australian

Note  Comparable performance information for 2001–02, where available, is shown in brackets.

top

Table 11  Summary of performance in relation to administered items, 2002–03
Administered item:  Members' salaries
Measure Performance
Quality: All variations and salary increases are processed with an accuracy rate of at least 99 per cent All variations and salary increases were processed with an accuracy rate of at least 99 per cent (99 per cent)
Quantity: 150 payments processed monthly with an annual budget of $19.41 million for salaries and allowances 1,800 (1,790) payments were processed monthly at a cost of $5.44 ($4.76) per transaction

One (one) pay increase was processed

Salary and allowance expenses for members were $20.16 million ($19.27 million)

Other payments totalled $0.29 million

Total expenses were $20.45 million ($19.5 million)
Administered item:  Citizenship Visits Program
Measure Performance
Quality: Subsidy payments are processed within seven days of receiving a payment request Subsidy payments were processed within two days (two days) of receiving a completed payment request
Quantity: 14,000 student visitors with an annual subsidy budget of $0.51 million (the Senate also contributed $0.51 million) 16,047 eligible student visitors were subsidised, at an average subsidy payment of $63.10 per student (15,470 students at an average of $64.84) – costs were shared with the Department of the Senate

Total expenses were $0.51 million
Administered item:  Holders of public office
Measure Performance
Quality: All variations are processed with less than a 1 per cent error rate All variations were processed with an accuracy rate of 99 per cent (99 per cent)
Quantity: 7 average staffing level (ASL) with an annual salary budget of $0.56 million 7 ASL (7 ASL) at an average of $62,566 ($74,285) per ASL

Total expenses were $0.52 ($0.52 million)

Note:  Performance information for 2001–02, where available, is shown in brackets.

top

Table 12  Summary of performance in relation to each output, 2002–03
Output Group 1:  Chamber and Main Committee
1.1 Procedural advice and support services: Provision of policy advice, facilities and services in support of the operation of the Chamber and Main Committee
Measure Performance
Quality: The department will provide the necessary services and support to enable the Chamber and Main Committee to meet and address business as scheduled, to ensure members have the information required for effective participation in the proceedings and to produce the records of the proceedings accurately and on time

Mechanism: Qualitative evaluation using client group discussions
The secretariats to the Chamber and the Main Committee operated in accordance with the standing and sessional orders and achieved a continuing high level of satisfaction among members with the quality and timeliness of services provided

100 per cent of members surveyed were satisfied with advice and service provision; 95 per cent were 'extremely' or 'highly' satisfied
Quantity: 820 sitting hours Hours of sitting of House 659 (465)

Hours of meeting of the Main Committee 186 (99)
Total price: $3.07 million $2.36 million ($2.32 million)
1.2 Legislation and research services: Provision of legislative drafting and research services and the processing and production of bills and associated materials
Measure Performance
Quality: Rate of client satisfaction with advice and assistance supplied with particular regard to accuracy, timeliness and completeness

Less than 1 per cent errors for legislation documents

Mechanism
: Qualitative evaluation using client group discussions
All deadlines were met and there were no significant errors

100 per cent of members surveyed were satisfied with advice and service provision

Levels of 'extremely' or 'highly' satisfied members surveyed were 95 per cent for legislation and 90 per cent for research
Quantity: 5,000 hours processing bills 4,649 hours
Quantity: 7,000 hours of research and legislative drafting 6,509 hours
Total price: $0.72 million $0.73 million ($0.77million)
1.3 Community awareness: Provision of information and education services to promote public knowledge and awareness of, and interaction with, the work of the House of Representatives and the Commonwealth Parliament
Measure Performance
Target: Increased public knowledge and awareness of, and interaction with, the work of the House of Representatives and the Commonwealth Parliament 95 per cent of the 500 respondents to a survey on the About the House magazine said reading the magazine had increased their knowledge about the work and procedures of the House
Quality: 90 per cent of participants completing seminar evaluations are satisfied with the seminar program 98 per cent (98 per cent) of participants completing seminar evaluations were satisfied with the seminar program
Quantity: Annual community outreach program, including publications, seminar and lecture program, advertising and Centenary commemoration projects – CD-ROM and documentary and publication on 100 years of the House of Representatives The community outreach program was sustained and enhanced during the year, and centenary projects were progressed
Quantity: 90,000 student visitors 106,349 student visitors (106,511)
Total price: $1.46 million $1.1 million ($2.10million)
Output Group 2:  Committee services
2.1 Non-inquiry support services: Provision of services to support the general (non-inquiry) activities of committees
Measure Performance
Quality: Rate of satisfaction of committee members with advice and services provided

Mechanism
: Qualitative evaluation through discussions with and surveys of key clients
80 per cent of members surveyed were 'satisfied' to 'extremely satisfied' with the general non-inquiry support provided by the Committee Office
Quantity: 25,000 hours 28,630 hours (68,571 hours)
Total price: $3.94 million $2.30 million ($2.93 million)
2.2 Inquiry facilitation: Provision of procedural, research, analytical and administrative support for the conduct of inquiries and the publication of final reports
Measure Performance
Quality: Inquiries conducted meet target number and are within budget; satisfaction of committee chairs, deputy chairs and members with inquiry process

Mechanism: End of year comparisons with original target and budget; qualitative evaluation through discussions with and surveys of key clients
80 per cent of members surveyed were 'satisfied' to 'extremely satisfied' with the procedural, research, analytical, drafting and administrative support provided for the conduct of inquiries and production of reports
Quantity: 40 full year equivalent committee inquiries completed 37 (21) full year equivalent committee inquiries were conducted
Total price: $3.483 million $8.37 million ($3.97 million)
2.3 Interparliamentary relations: Provision of advice and support to facilitate the conduct of the Parliament's international and regional affairs
Measure Performance
Quality: Interparliamentary relations foster effective communication with affiliated bodies and accord with the standards set down by the respective organisations and office holders There were 31 outgoing parliamentary delegations, and 14 official and 28 unofficial incoming visits (27 outgoing and eight incoming)

There were 10 (17) visits by parliamentary officials
Quantity: 10,000 hours 11,700 hours
Quality: Incoming and outgoing delegations proceed in accordance with the agreed program and the visit objectives are met

Mechanism: Qualitative evaluation through debriefing sessions at the conclusion of each visit
Incoming and outgoing delegations proceeded in accordance with the agreed programs and the visit objectives were met, according to qualitative evaluation achieved through debriefing sessions conducted at the conclusion of each visit

100 per cent of members surveyed who had participated in outgoing parliamentary delegations were satisfied with the advice and support, including report drafting support, they received from departmental staff
Quantity: 3,000 hours support for outgoing delegations 2,925 hours
Quantity: 3,000 hours support for incoming visits 2,925 hours
Quality: Interests of other parliamentary visitors are met and there is at least one interparliamentary study program per calendar year

Mechanism: Feedback from visitors at end of each program
An interparliamentary study program was conducted

Participants and other such visitors reported very high levels of satisfaction with arrangements made for them
Quantity: 2,000 hours 1,950 hours
Total price: $2.44 million $1.44 million ($1.90 million)
Output Group 3:  Members' services
3.1 Policy advice: Provision of advice to the Speaker, members and others on members' entitlements and support
Measure Performance  
Quality: 95 per cent satisfaction of the Speaker and members

Mechanism: Qualitative evaluation through feedback provided by the Speaker and members
The Speaker and members informally indicated their satisfaction with the advice provided on members' entitlements and support and this satisfaction was reflected in the positive comment from members in the members' survey
Quantity: 1,850 hours 7,141 hours (519 hours)
Total price: $0.28 million $0.56 million ($20,000)
3.2 Salary and entitlements: Processing of members' salaries and entitlements in accordance with legislation and administrative decisions
Measure Performance
Quality: All payments and requests processed with an error rate of less than 1 per cent All salary payments and one pay increase were processed on time and with an error rate of less than 1 per cent (less than 1 per cent)
Quantity: 2,000 hours 295 hours
Total price: $0.103 million $0.04 million ($7,000)
3.3 Facilities and services: Provision of facilities and services in accordance with administrative decisions
Measure Performance
Quality: Rate of satisfaction of members with the appropriate accommodation and facilities to enable them to carry out their parliamentary duties

Mechanism
: Qualitative evaluation from formal and informal client group discussions and surveys
100 per cent of members surveyed were satisfied with services provided; 95 per cent were 'extremely' or 'highly' satisfied

334 (462) routine maintenance requests were actioned

The target for emergency requests was action within five minutes and this target was reached in relation to 99.75 per cent (100 per cent) of the 367 (363) emergency requests received

The target for furniture movement requests was to satisfy Priority 1 tasks within three hours, Priority 2 tasks within 12 hours, Priority 3 tasks within 24 hours and Priority 4 tasks within two to five days – of the 602 (839) requests received, all Priority 1, 2, 3 and 4 tasks were completed within the target time

We achieved a 99.85 per cent (99.5) per cent degree of accuracy in relation to the agreed target of conducting the transport service without error
Quantity: 150 members 150 (150) members used our facilities and services
Total price: $13.39 million $19.02 million ($14.35 million)

Notes:  

Performance information for 2001–02, where available, is shown in brackets.

References to 'members surveyed' relate to the survey of members conducted in 2002–03 – for more information, see Appendix 13.

In 2002–03, the department used a timecard based system combined with an analysis of direct costs to attribute time and expenses to outputs. The basis of attribution has changed from last financial year, when an analysis of costs and drivers was used to attribute time and expenses.

Total price includes resources received free of charge.


< < -Appendices < - previous : next - >

top