 |
No. 20 - Reading a bill
This Brief Guide
examines the structure of bills and parliamentary amendments to bills, and how
they are dealt with in committee of the whole.
For more detail on the consideration of legislation, see Brief Guide No. 9—Consideration of legislation.
Structurally, bills
fall into two categories, based on their function:
Occasionally, bills
combine both functions. The type of bill
determines its layout and the terminology used to describe its parts.
New, stand-alone legislation
A bill proposing new,
stand-alone legislation consists of a title (“A Bill for an Act to...”), enacting
words (“The Parliament of Australia enacts:”) and a series of clauses. When passed, a bill becomes an Act and clauses are referred to as sections. The parts of a clause are:
- subclause (or subsection on enactment);
- paragraph;
- subparagraph;
-
sub-subparagraph (rarely used).
The clauses may be
grouped according to subject matter. The
normal hierarchy of groupings is as follows:
Chapter
Part
Division
Subdivision
If used, the most
common groupings are Parts and Divisions.
A bill of this type may also have one or more Schedules at the end,
containing material which will form part of the Act but which is convenient to
present separately from the main body.
Examples include the texts of treaties or other international agreements
being incorporated into Australian law, pro formas such as the ballot papers
and nomination forms in Schedule 1 of the Commonwealth
Electoral Act 1918 or self-contained rules relating to particular matters
referred to in the main body, such as the conditions applying to the various
types of broadcasting licences in Schedule 2 of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
Confusingly, the parts of a Schedule are also usually called “clauses”
and continue to be so called even after enactment.
—numbering
There is no universal
system of numbering for Commonwealth legislation. Some bills or Acts have their own numbering
systems, particularly when the bill or Act is a large one, like the Corporations Law. However, the most common system uses the
following conventions:
-
Chapters (if any) are numbered
consecutively from 1;
-
within each Chapter, Parts are
numbered consecutively from 1, each new Chapter beginning with Part 1;
-
within each Part, Divisions are
numbered consecutively from 1, each new Part beginning with Division 1;
-
within each Division, Subdivisions
are lettered consecutively from A;
-
within the Act or bill as a whole,
sections or clauses are numbered consecutively from 1; for example,
Division 3 of Part 2 might begin with section (or clause) 46.
The system of numbering
used in any bill or Act will be clear from the contents page. In citing a particular “bit” of a bill or
Act, it is normal to include only so much information as is necessary to
distinguish that “bit” from others.
Clause or section numbers are always unique (unless there has been an
error!) and are referred to in isolation; for example, it is not necessary to
say “section (or clause) 46 of Division 3 of Part 2” because section (or
clause) 46 occurs only once. But it may
be necessary to say “Division 3 of Part 2”, rather than “Division 3”, if other
Parts in the bill or Act also contain a Division 3.
Examples of other
numbering systems include the following:
-
The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 contains Chapters 1 to 6. Within Chapters, Part numbers have two elements, the
first being the Chapter number; for example, Part 2-5, Part 3-1, Part
3-45. Divisions are the most
important guide to the different areas covered by the Act. They are numbered in a sequence from 1
to 995 throughout the whole Act.
Subdivision and section numbers have two elements, the first being
the Division number. So, for
example, section 375-815 (about deductibility of film losses) is located
in Subdivision 375-G, Division 375 of Part 3-45 of Chapter 3. It is preceded by section 375-810 and
followed by section 375-820. There
are gaps left in the Part, Division and section numbering sequences
because it is expected that more and more “bits” will need to be inserted
in the Act over time.
-
The Aged Care Act 1997 follows similar conventions, but on a
smaller scale and without the gaps.
-
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 contains Chapters 1 to 7 but its 22 Parts are numbered consecutively
throughout; for example, Chapter 5 begins with Part 12.
Unless gaps have been
left in the numerical sequence, new sections are inserted using a combination
of numbers and letters. For example:
—typeface
In Commonwealth
legislation typography is used as a guide to the structure and, therefore, the
meaning of the text, by providing signposts for the reader. Spacing and indentation are also used to
indicate the relationship between units of text. For example:
-
normal text in a bill or Act is
always in 11 point Times New Roman font:
The
export of a specimen is an export from an approved aquaculture program in
accordance with this section if the specimen was sourced from a program that,
under the regulations, is taken to be an approved aquaculture program.
-
notes or cross-references which do
not form part of the bill or Act are distinguished by being in smaller 9
point font:
Note: The defendant bears an evidential
burden in relation to the matter in subsection (4). See subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code.
-
section headings are always bold:
303FA
Eligible non-commercial purpose exports
-
other headings always have the same
attributes:
Division 5—Concepts relating to
permit criteria
Subdivision A—Non-commercial purpose
exports and imports
-
a defined term always appears in
bold italics:
For the purposes of this
Part, the import of a specimen is an eligible non-commercial purpose import if, and only if:
It is important to
understand how an Act is numbered and the typographical conventions that are
used because these are the keys to understanding any bill to amend that Act.
Amending bills
Most bills are of the
second type; that is, bills amending existing legislation.
An amending bill
usually consists of a title, enacting words, 3 clauses and a schedule or number
of schedules. These schedules are
sometimes called amending schedules to distinguish them from the Schedules
referred to above which contain substantive parts of the bill or Act. The 3 clauses provide for:
-
what the Act is to be referred to
as (Short title);
-
when it (or its various parts)
will come into effect (Commencement); and
-
an “activating” clause which gives
the schedules their authority as law (Schedule(s)).
The schedules
comprise a series of items, each one
containing an amendment to an Act or providing for related matters such as how
the amendments are to apply, what transitional arrangements between the old law
and the new law are necessary or whether the old law will continue to apply in
any particular circumstances. These
latter items are sometimes called application, transitional and saving
provisions, respectively.
An item containing an
amendment to an Act consists of 3 parts:
-
the item heading which specifies
where in the Act the amendment is to be made;
-
the instruction which specifies
what action is to occur (for example: “Insert”, “Add”, “Repeal”, “Repeal...,
substitute”); and
-
the text of the amendment (if
required).
Using the item
heading as a locator, the reader can follow the instruction to read the
proposed amendment into the parent Act in order to see what the Act, as
proposed to be amended by the bill, will look like.
Typography is just as
important in an amending bill as it is in a stand-alone bill because it is used
to distinguish information about the location of amendments from the proposed
new text (which follows the typographical conventions described above for
stand-alone bills). The headings of
amending schedules, parts of amending schedules (if used) and items are always
in Arial font,
with the font size corresponding to the level of heading. The name of the Act being amended is also
shown distinctively if it is not included in the schedule heading. For example:
In amending items,
proposed new text attracts the same terminology as the Act being amended. In Schedule 1, item 4, above, for example,
section 232A is referred to as a section, not a clause.
Amendments to bills
Just as bills follow
strict structural, typographical and stylistic conventions, so too do
parliamentary amendments. These
conventions make it easy to read the amendments into the bill, in the same way
that items in an amending bill are read into the parent Act. Using page and line numbers of the bill,
amendments identify the point in the bill where the proposed action is to occur
before describing the action and any proposed new text. The format differs slightly according to
whether the bill is a stand-alone bill or an amending bill. For example:

Note that the
descriptor in bold, italicised text at the end is not part of the amendment. It is a guide to the subject matter of the
amendment to assist the chamber and facilitate the preparation of running
sheets (see Brief Guide No. 9—Consideration of Legislation).
Procedure in committee of
the whole
Bills are considered
in detail and any amendments are moved, debated and determined in committee of
the whole (see Brief Guide No. 9—Consideration of Legislation). Usually, the bill is taken as a whole, which
means the entire bill is before the committee and any part may be amended, not
necessarily in a sequential manner. This
facilitates the practice of dealing with related amendments and issues, regardless
of where they occur in a bill.
Amendments are moved
one at a time or, by leave, in groups.
When a bill is taken as a whole the chair puts the question on each
amendment or group of amendments, or on each amendment to an amendment. When all amendments have been dealt with, the
final question is “That the bill, as amended, be agreed to” or, if no
amendments have been moved or successful, “That the bill stand as printed”.
The question on an
amendment to delete a clause, item
or proposed new section (or a larger unit such as a Subdivision, Division,
Part, Chapter or Schedule) is put in the form “That the [unit] stand as
printed”. This is designed to test
whether the unit has majority support.
An equally divided vote on that question results in it being decided in
the negative and the unit being removed from the bill (see Brief Guide No. 16—Voting in the Senate). If the question took the form “That the
amendment [to omit the unit] be agreed to”, an equally divided vote would
result in that question being lost
and a unit which did not have
majority support remaining in the bill.
To avoid this wrong result, amendments of this type are always drafted
in the form “[unit], TO BE OPPOSED”
(see above) and are always put by the chair separately from other amendments.
Need Assistance?
For assistance with
any of the matters covered by this guide, government senators or their staff
should contact the Clerk Assistant (Table), on extension 3020; and
non-government senators or their staff should contact the Clerk Assistant
(Procedure), on extension 3380.
February 2005
This publication is available electronically at http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/pubs/guides/index.htm

|
 |