No. 14 - Debating legislation under time limits
Debate on a bill is
not normally subject to overall time limits, although individual speaking times
apply (see Brief Guide
No. 4—Rules of Debate).
Theoretically, consideration of a bill can continue indefinitely. However, a majority of the Senate may agree
with the declaration by a minister that a particular bill is urgent and should
be subject to a time limit.
Colloquially, such a time limit is referred to as a guillotine. This procedure
is, in practice, limited to government bills because only a minister may move
the necessary procedural motions.
Why are guillotines used?
Where the government
can obtain the support of a majority of the Senate, guillotines are used to
provide finite debating times for a particular bill or to bring protracted
debates to a close. They are most
frequently imposed at the end of a period of sittings when the time available
to deal with complex or copious legislation is running out. They are also used where a determined
minority, by using the debating opportunities open to it, has prolonged debate
on a bill. Adoption of a time limit ensures
that the questions necessary to determine whether a bill will pass are put to
the vote.
How is a time limit initiated?
Only a minister may
initiate a time limit. The first step is
for a minister to declare that a bill is an urgent bill and move that the bill
be considered an urgent bill. The declaration
and motion may refer to a single bill or to multiple bills or packages of
bills. This motion may not be debated or
amended and must be put immediately (standing order
142).
Non-government senators
have contingent notices on the Notice
Paper to enable them to move, contingent on a bill being declared urgent,
that so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the motion
being debated. When notice has been
given in this way, the suspension of standing orders requires only a simple
majority rather than an absolute majority (see Brief Guide
No. 5—Suspension of Standing Orders).
The suspension motion may be debated for up to 30 minutes but debate may
be foreshortened if any senator moves the closure
(a motion that the question be now put).
These contingent notices potentially enable the limitations built into
the process of putting a guillotine in place to be set aside. Contingent notices relating to other parts of
the process (or occasions) are
mentioned below. Only one such
contingent notice may be used on any single occasion.
How much time can be spent debating an urgent
bill?
Once the motion that
a bill is urgent is agreed to, the next step is for a minister to move a motion
allotting time for the remaining stages of debate on the bill, or for any
particular stage. This may be expressed
in terms of hours, minutes or days or it may incorporate specific deadlines. Times may be allotted to each or any of the
remaining stages or all remaining stages.
For example:
|
Tariff
Amendment Bill—allotment of time
|
|
second reading
|
1 hour
|
|
committee of the whole
|
2 hours
|
|
or
|
|
Tariff
Amendment Bill—allotment of time
|
|
second reading
|
till 9:30pm, Monday 14
December
|
|
committee of the whole
|
till 11:30pm, Monday 14
December
|
|
third reading
|
till 11:45pm, Monday 14
December
|
|
or
|
|
Tariff
Amendment Bill—all remaining stages 3½ hours
|
The motion for the
allotment of time may be debated for up to an hour, unless debate is
foreshortened by the closure, and it may also be amended. Again, non-government senators have on the Notice Paper contingent notices for the
suspension of standing orders to set aside this limitation and enable unlimited
debate on the motion for the allotment of time.
The suspension motion may be debated for up to 30 minutes unless the
closure is successfully used. If the
suspension motion is unsuccessful, debate on the motion for the allotment of
time resumes, unless foreshortened by the closure. Once the allotment of time is agreed to, with
or without amendment, the guillotine operates from the time that debate on the
bill commences or resumes.
What happens when the allotted time expires?
When the time
available has expired, the chair must put the question then before the Senate
or the committee of the whole, and any other questions necessary to bring
proceedings on the bill to a conclusion.
The question is put on any amendments that have been circulated at least
2 hours before the expiration of time.
Alternatively, a
minister may move that the allotted time be extended, or a non-government
senator may use a third contingent notice to suspend standing orders to enable
a motion to be moved for the extension of time or for unlimited time on the
bill.
An urgent bill
remains urgent until proceedings are finally concluded. If an urgent bill is returned from the House
of Representatives, a minister may move a further allotment of time for its
consideration.
A “civilised” guillotine?
Where the various
parties agree to the allotment of time limits for bills, this is known as a
“civilised” guillotine. It is a formal
device to manage the time available for considering legislation, employed by
consensus.
Need assistance?
For assistance with
any of the matters covered by this guide, government senators or their staff
should contact the Clerk Assistant (Table), on extension 3020; and
non-government senators or their staff should contact the Clerk Assistant
(Procedure), on extension 3380.
February 2005
This publication is
available electronically at http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/pubs/guides/index.htm.

|