From: Margaret Perkins
[margpca@rocknet.net.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 August 2002 4:24
PM
To: legcon.sen@aph.gov.au
Subject: Submission re
Migration Legislation Amendment (Further Border Protection Measures) Bill
2002
This is all I ask of you: to live justly, to
love tenderly, and to walk humbly with your God (Micah)
THE ROCKHAMPTON SOCIAL JUSTICE ACTION
GROUP
Chairperson
Mrs Margaret Perkins
124 Talford Street
Rockhampton 4700
Tel 07 4927 7853
Fax 07 4921 2262
***************************************************************************************************************************************************
The Rockhampton Social Justice Action Group is a community
organization which co-ordinates and supports Social Justice
activities in the Rockhampton region and promotes
awareness-raising by distributing relevant documents from both
church
and community organizations throughout the Rockhampton
Catholic Diocese.
As Queenslanders, we object to the excising of all
islands that form part of Queensland and are north of latitude 12
South.
Apart from the implications for border security and asylum
seekers we would like clarification on the repercussions on
other areas of governance, including social security,
environment, shipping, and seek the results of consultations with
affected communities in relation to the Governments excision
proposals.
Should this proposed legislation be successful,
would Australia still respond to requests for assistance by non-asylum
seekers,
in these islands?
That aside, the proposal to deter asylum seekers by
restricting their access to offshore places in Australia is
questionable.
Persons seeking to flee a situation endangering themselves
or their families will take whatever risks are
necessary.
Recommendation The proposed Bill should
be rejected because we do not believe it will provide the border
security
desired by the Government and will not stop people entering Australia for
protection.
We believe the Australian Government has denied the basic right of
individuals to enter a country for the purpose of
claiming asylum
Federal Parliament has a Constitutional duty under section 51(xxv11) of the
Commonwealth Constitution to ensure
Australia's Asylum Seeker policy fosters peace and good will towards
all asylum seekers.
By changing the Migration Act by the excision of offshore islands from the
migration zone, Federal Parliament is
creating
an anomaly with it's constitutional duty.
The migration Act 1958 requiring the asylum seeker to enter the Australian
Government Migration Zone bestowed a
right to asylum seekers to claim asylum from Australia.
This right is respected and identified, and highlighted, as an
absolute basic human right by Catholic Social
Teaching
(John XX111, Encyclical Letter on Establishing Universal
Peace in Truth, Justice, Charity and Liberty. Pacem in Terris, 11 April 1963,
106)
Asylum seekers have, as everyone else, the full range of human rights, and
the entire human family has the privilege and the
responsibility of actively upholding those rights (Australian Catholic Bishops' Statement 26 March
2002)
Article 14 (1), Universal Declaration of Human
Rights states - Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other
countries asylum from
persecution.
Therefore the proposed Bill is in direct opposition to a universally
accepted basic right
Recommendation
The Committee should recommend the rejection of the Bill because it
is in direct opposition to
a
universally accepted basic human right.
Margaret Perkins
Chairperson
Rockhampton Social Justice Action group
124 Talford Street
Rockhampton 4700
Tel 07 4927 7853
Fax 07 4921 2262
Email margpca@rocknet.net.au