Inquiry into the Provisions of the Human Rights
(Mandatory Sentencing for Property Offences) Bill 2000
From: Hailes, Sonia (SEN) on behalf of Legal and Constitutional,
Committee (SEN)
Sent: Friday, 27 July 2001 4:34 PM
To: Wilson, Christine (SEN)
Subject: FW: Submission to the Senate Inquiry on Mandatory Sentencing
The Secretary
Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee
PARLIAMENT HOUSE
CANBERRA ACT 2600
I am writing to voice my support for the banning of mandatory sentencing
for all property crimes in all states and territories of Australia.
Statistics have been presented to the Committee that clearly show that
mandatory sentencing primarily affects Aboriginal people. Many people
convicted have committed their offences as a direct result of their socio-economic
situation - to either satisfy their basic physical needs or to gain something
(eg petrol, aerosal cans) to provide a high - a mental relief from their
daily reminders of oppresion, poverty and lack of respect. Many
Aborigines are on the bottom of the socio-economic scale as a direct result
of the oppression of their people since colonisation of Australia.
This oppression has taken many forms, some direct and some sublime.
Mandatory sentencing is, I believe a continuation of this oppression.
Imprisoning people will not reduce the frequency of criminal offences.
Since the introduction of mandatory sentencing in both the Northern Territory
and Western Australia crimes rates have not reduced. People can
not be deterred when they commit their crimes out of desperation.
They will not be deterred by laws they do not know or understand, as is
the case with many citizens of remote Aboriginal communities whose are
being jailed under these laws. To reduce the number of crimes committed
the cause of people committing crimes must be addressed. Instead
of spending large amounts of money on incarceration further action is
needed on the recommendations of the Inquiry into Deaths in Custody and
the Reconciliation Council.
Many of those sentenced under mandatory sentencing laws are juvenilles
who have committed very minor offences. In many cases community
service or some form of rehabilition may be the most effective response
to prevent the person for re-offending. Mandatory sentencing removes
the right of judges to use their experience and knowledge to determine
the most appropriate sentence. There is no option for a sentence
of community service or rehabilitation. Instead these young people
are put into jails where their resentment is likely to grow, they are
likely to be exposed to more hardened criminals, and they just may not
be able to cope.
I therefore urge the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee to support
the Bill to ban mandatory sentencing for all property crimes committed
across Australia,
Yours sincerely,
Robyn Erwin
39 First Ave
Chelsea Heights, Vic, 3196
Phone (03) 9772 1664

|