Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - SenatePhoto of the Senate Chamber
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact
Search the Senate  

Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education Committee

Inquiry into the Capacity of Public Universities to Meet Australia's Higher Education Needs

Submission to Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee inquiry into "The capacity of public universities to meet Australia’s higher education needs"

from

The Council of Deans of Health Sciences

14 February 2001

Introduction

    1. The Council of Deans of Health Sciences consists of Deans from those Faculties which have programs in a range of health science disciplines. Specifically, the Faculties must have at least three programs from the list of professions at Attachment A. The Council of Deans of Health Sciences thus complements similar Councils which specifically represent the interests of Faculties of Nursing and of Medicine. It is important to note that most of the Faculties covered within the Faculty of Health Sciences also incorporate nursing programs within their Faculties and some also incorporate Schools of Medicine. There are only nine Faculties which meet the criteria for membership and these are listed at Attachment B.

    2. The Council of Deans of Health Sciences welcomes this opportunity to make a submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Capacity of Public Universities to meet Australia’s Higher Education Needs.

Term of Reference (a) i: The adequacy of current funding arrangements with respect to the capacity of universities to manage and serve increasing demand

    3. The Council of Deans of Health Sciences believe that current arrangements for organisation and funding of universities constrains significantly the ability of universities to meet the burgeoning demand for health science education in Australia and thus impacts adversely on the ability of the health sector to respond to changing needs.

    4. Health sciences courses, across a range of disciplines, are extremely popular and this applies not only to medicine but also to many health sciences professions such as physiotherapy and occupational therapy. If additional places were made available in these courses they would easily be able to be filled by students of a very high quality.

    5. There is an emerging workforce shortage in many of these professions in rural, regional and metropilitan centres. These shortages arise because of the aging of the Australia population, the changes occurring in the health sector, and the changing nature of treatment which is increasing the need for a workforce with more advanced skills.

    6. Current university funding arrangements are generally not able to respond to these changing patterns of demand. This is partly because of overall caps in funded places within a state and in part because of the difficulty in moving places from low demand areas which have a lower course completion cost to the somewhat more expensive health sciences programs. Moreover, making additional places available in the health sciences for full-fee paying domestic undergraduate students has not proven to be a successful strategy to meet the changes in demand.

    7. The changing nature of the health sector has placed additional pressures on health science education for a number of reasons. First, funding constraints within the health sector have limited the ability of health agencies to provide the same level of clinical education placements compared with previous years. As hospitals and other agencies have been downsized, there are fewer suitably qualified staff available to supervise students which reduces the availability of places in clinical education. Secondly, a shift in treatment location from institutional settings to community and home based settings is occurring in the health sector. This is supported by the Council of Deans of Health Sciences as providing better treatment options but this shift further reduces the availability of clinical placements. In the past, large outpatient clinics in hospitals could absorb a number of students on placement. Placing students as part of domiciliary programs can be more disruptive for clients and so limits the number of students that can accompany a visiting professional generally to one student per home. It is also more difficult for university academic staff to observe student performance in these settings.

    8. These changes in the health sector have significantly increased the costs of clinical education to universities because:

    • the supervision provided by university staff has increased to replace that previously provided by health sector staff;
    • universities are invariably being asked to pay health sector agencies for clinical supervision;
    • the average number of students in each clinical placement is falling.

    9. These changes in the costs of clinical education have not been reflected in changes in resourcing from the Commonwealth government to universities for these increased costs.

Term of Reference (a) i and (f):

    10. One particular aspect of the inadequacy of funding arrangements relates to the requirement on universities to absorb the full costs of salary increases through improved productivity. Health sciences courses have been traditionally underfunded in universities (essentially because the relative funded model was based on a pre-university pattern of staffing and teaching) and thus health science faculties are particularly adversely affected by this decision.

    11. Health Sciences faculties are constrained in their ability to achieve productivity improvements. Typical strategies may not work:

    • increasing class sizes is often precluded (e.g. because registration bodies specify clinical supervision ratios), unwise (because of student safety considerations), or counter-productive (because of high capital costs of specialist teaching facilities such as wet anatomy);
    • reduction in subject content may impact adversely on students’ ability to meet registration requirements and to perform adequately as skilled employees in the health sector on graduation.
    • increased contact hours for staff may not be feasible because they already have relatively high workloads compared to colleagues in science disciplines.
    • on-line delivery systems in the health sciences are now being used but they are not leading to the productivity gains and efficiencies that were initially predicted (e.g., because of initial financial outlays; the need for a significantly enhanced IT infrastructure).

    12. Salaries of staff in Health Sciences faculties need to be related not only to their university peers but also to those paid in the health sector. Failure to pay adequate salaries will reduce the ability of universities to attract experienced professionals to pursue academic careers (teaching or research or both).

    13. It is the view of the Council of Deans of Health Sciences that the ability of the university sector to achieve further productivity gains as a way of funding salary increases is now very limited, especially in health sciences.

Term of Reference (b)

    14. The Council of Deans of Health Sciences believes that the existing funding arrangements for universities are not sufficiently flexible to respond to changing needs and recommends a review of the funding arrangements for undergraduate teaching and clinical education

    15.The increased reliance on private funding and market behaviour in the university sector, in particular the shift of postgraduate education to full fee has significantly affected the ability of the university sector to respond to the needs of the health sector.

    16. Many health professionals need to update their qualifications regularly as a result of the rapidly changing requirements of the health sector. Often health professionals are not undertaking additional qualifications because of their desire to obtain additional income but rather because of the changed needs in the workplace and their desire to increase their ability to respond to existing needs. Accordingly, the private returns to postgraduate education are very low and hence health personnel are very unwilling to pay for full fee courses.

    17. Because of the funding restraint within the health sector itself, employers are generally not prepared to pay the fees for a full fee postgraduate program.

    18. As a result of these factors, the reduction in funded postgraduate places and increased reliance on full-fee payment for postgraduate coursework has lead to a reduction in demand for postgraduate coursework in universities. In the medium term this is likely to have an adverse impact on the performance of the health sector itself.

    19. The Council of Deans of Health Sciences would be happy to speak directly to the Committee about the issues raised in this submission.

     

top