|
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Senator Andrew Murray’s Comments
This Report is tabled on Thursday 7 December 2006. It is a long report on a complex subject. I do not know whether it is a substantial
or considered body of work, because in this busy last sitting week of the year
I have not had time to read it, nor was I given enough time to read it.
As a member of the Committee, a copy of the Chair's Draft
was sent to my email address on Tuesday 5 December 2006 at 11h41. I had seen
no earlier drafts. The Committee meeting to approve the Chair's Report was
held at 08h30 on Wednesday 6 December 2006, 21 hours later.
As this report is a broad reference, and was not dictated by
a legislative timetable, there is nothing to have prevented it being tabled
later, out-of-session.
I understand the Chair had this draft in his possession for
nearly two weeks.
In what is through long precedent expected to be a
considerate reasonable mature and professional approach, the process of
Committee reports is to give Committee members adequate time to read the
Chair's draft and propose any changes or adjustments they think necessary. The
Chair may then accept or reject those suggestions. If he or she does not
accept those suggestions, then adequate time should be provided to allow for
minorities or additional remarks to be written.
I have no opinion on the Chair's Report because I have not
had time to read it or reflect on it.
The contempt with which I and other members of the Committee
have been treated reflects poorly on the Chair. It indicates an unhealthy and
unwise attitude.
Opposition Senators have shown me their brief minority
report, and I am sympathetic to their concerns.
Senator Andrew Murray
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Comments to: web.senate@aph.gov.au
Last reviewed 7 December 2006 by the Senate Web Administrator
© Commonwealth of Australia
Parliament of Australia Web Site Privacy Statement
Images courtesy of AUSPIC
|
