Chapter 1

Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1        On 5 December 2013, the Senate referred the provisions of the Tax Laws Amendment (Research and Development) Bill 2013 to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 17 March 2014.[1] The bill proposes to limit access to the research and development (R&D) tax incentive to companies with an aggregated assessable income of less than $20 billion.

Conduct of the inquiry

1.2        The committee advertised the inquiry on its website and wrote to relevant stakeholders and other interested parties inviting submissions. The committee received 20 submissions, which are listed in Appendix 1.

1.3        The committee held a public hearing in Canberra on 21 February 2014. The names of the witnesses that gave evidence are at Appendix 2.

1.4        The committee thanks all of the individuals and organisations that contributed to this inquiry.

Structure of this report

1.5        This report is comprised of three chapters:

Overview and background

1.6        This section provides an overview of the R&D tax incentive framework as it currently operates. The changes proposed by the bill and the origin of these proposed changes are then outlined.

R&D tax incentive

1.7        Tax incentives to promote R&D have been in place in Australia since 1986.[2] The current R&D tax incentive was introduced in 2011 and applies to income years commencing on or after 1 July 2011.[3] The incentive is contained in division 355 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and consists of two components:

1.8        To be eligible for the R&D incentive, an entity needs to:

Changes proposed by the bill

1.9        The bill proposes to amend the ITAA 1997 to restrict the R&D tax incentive to companies with an aggregated assessable income of less than $20 billion for an income year. The bill also proposes a consequential amendment to the Industry Research and Development Act to address an adverse outcome that may arise if, because the $20 billion threshold made it ineligible, a company did not register its Australian core R&D activities conducted in earlier tax years.[8] The measures contained in the bill will apply to income years starting on or after 1 July 2013.

1.10      In his second reading speech on the bill, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer provided the following summary of the reasons underpinning the proposed amendments:  

The measure targets access to the research and development (R&D) tax incentive to the small and medium sized entities that are more responsive to increasing their R&D spending as a result of government incentives. In other words, it reduces waste by ensuring that government incentives for R&D are applied in a more effective way.[9]

1.11      The proposed changes were first planned by the previous government, which announced the measures in February 2013 as part of its A Plan for Australian Jobs package.[10] The proposed R&D tax changes were included in the 2013–14 Budget[11] and a bill intended to give effect to the changes was introduced in June 2013.[12] However, that bill lapsed when the 43rd Parliament was prorogued.

Consideration of the bill by other committees

Senate Scrutiny of Bills Committee

1.12      The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills assesses legislative proposals against a set of accountability standards that focus on the effect of proposed legislation on individual rights, liberties and obligations, and on parliamentary propriety. The Scrutiny of Bills Committee considered the bill in its eighth Alert Digest of 2013—it focused on the retrospective application of the proposed amendments. The issue of retrospectivity, including the Scrutiny of Bills Committee's assessment, is examined further in chapter 2.

Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights

1.13      One of the functions of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights (PJCHR) is to examine bills for compatibility with human rights, and to report to both Houses of the Parliament on that issue.[13] The PJCHR considers that the bill 'does not appear to give rise to human rights concerns'.[14]

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page