Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 22 1997-98

When will it be? Timetables for the next Commonwealth Election

Margaret Healy
Politics and Public Administration Group
23 January 1998

While the calling of an election is a matter of political judgment and timing, a constitutional and legislative framework governs the electoral timetables and processes. The Australian Constitution requires periodic elections for both Houses of Parliament, and separate provisions reflect the different constitutional status of each House. The Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 provides the detailed framework.

The House of Representatives Election

The maximum term of the House of Representatives is set by section 28 of the Constitution, which states:

Every House of Representatives shall continue for three years from the first meeting of the House, and no longer, but may be sooner dissolved by the Governor-General.

Section 32 of the Constitution requires the writs(1) for an election to be issued within ten days of the expiry or dissolution of the House of Representatives. Detailed election procedures are specified in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Eight writs are issued for a general election of the House of Representatives, one for each State and Territory, and these must all be issued on the same day. The detailed timetabling provisions are:

  • Section 155 provides that the electoral rolls close seven days after the issue of the writ.
  • Section 156 provides that nominations of candidates close not less than 11 days, or more than 28 days after the date of the writ.
  • Section 157 provides that polling day shall not be less than 22 days, nor more than 30 days after the date of nomination.
  • Section 158 provides that the election must be held on a Saturday.
  • Section 159 provides that the writ must be returned no more than 100 days after the issue of the writ.
  • Section 160 provides that the elections for all Divisions of the House of Representatives must be held on the same day, and that all writs are to be returned on the same day.

The time period allowed from the issue of the writs to polling day is no less than 33 days and no more than 68 days. In 1996 the House of Representatives was dissolved on 27 January, the writs were issued on 29 January, the rolls closed on 5 February, nominations closed on 9 February and the election was held on 2 March 1996. Thus the whole election period lasted 33 days.

To calculate the last possible date of the next election, the maximum number of days specified must be applied. The next election must be held within 68 days of the expiry of the 38th Parliament, which opened on 30 April 1996, and which therefore expires on 30 April 1999. The election for the House of Representatives must be held by 3 July 1999, the last Saturday within this period.

However an election may be held at any time before that date, and generally elections are called well before there is a constitutional or legal necessity. There has only been one instance of an election being held after a parliament expired through effluxion of time. This was in 1910, with the Third Parliament.

The Half Senate Election

Unlike the House of Representatives, the Senate is a continuing body. Generally, half the Senate retires at each election. (The term of Senators for the Territories, however, coincide with that of the House of Representatives.) Section 13 of the Constitution requires that:

the election to fill vacant places shall be made within one year before the places are to become vacant.

There is no constitutional requirement that elections for the House of Representatives and the Senate be held simultaneously, but they are generally held together. Separate half Senate elections were held in 1953, 1964, 1967 and 1970. The latest possible date for the next House of Representatives election (3 July 1999) occurs shortly after the period during which a half Senate election must be held. If the elections for the House of Representatives and half the Senate are to be held simultaneously, the date must conform with the constitutional provisions relating to the terms of Senators and the period during which the election must be held.

The last election was held on 2 March 1996, and the preceding one on 13 March 1993. The terms of Senators elected in 1993 expire on 30 June 1999. Therefore the next half Senate election must be held between 1 July 1998 and 30 June 1999.

About six weeks must be allowed to enable the counting of the Senate vote to be completed before 30 June 1999, as this process must be completed before the new Senate terms commence on 1 July 1999.(2) This means that the latest possible date for a simultaneous election is mid-May 1999. Of course, a simultaneous election for both Houses may be held at any time within the year preceding the expiry of the Senate term.

A Double Dissolution

Usually an election for the Commonwealth Parliament is for the House of Representatives and half the Senate. However, section 57 of the Constitution provides that both Houses may be simultaneously dissolved should there be a legislative deadlock between them. Section 57 provides in part:

If the House of Representatives passes any proposed law, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the House of Representatives, in the same or the next session, again passes the proposed law with or without any amendments which have been made, suggested, or agreed to by the Senate, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, the Governor-General may dissolve the Senate and the House of Representatives simultaneously. But such dissolution shall not take place within six months before the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives by effluxion of time.

As a double dissolution may not take place within six months before the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives by effluxion of time, the last possible date for the dissolution of both Houses is Thursday 29 October 1998. (This is calculated by counting back six months from the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives, which would occur on 30 April 1999.)

After that date the usual timetabling requirements would apply. The writs must be issued within ten days of the dissolution. i.e. by Sunday 8 November 1998. The writs may be issued on the same day as the dissolution occurs, but as section 12 of the Constitution requires the writs for Senate elections to be issued by the State Governors, these writs might not be issued on the same day as the dissolution. Should the writs be issued on the same day, and the shortest times apply, nominations would close on Monday 9 November and polling would be 5 December 1998. Should the maximum times apply, the writs would have to be issued by Sunday 8 November, and nominations would have to close by Sunday 6 December. The latest possible polling day would then be Saturday 2 January 1999. It would be quite impractical to hold an election during this holiday period, and so the maximum periods are most unlikely to apply. Either the first or the second Saturday of December 1998 (5 December or 12 December) is a more likely date.

A critical consideration affecting the timing of any double dissolution is the date from whence is calculated the three month interval which must elapse before the House of Representatives may pass its amended or rejected legislation for the second time. Although some aspects of section 57 remain unclear, a majority of the High Court held in Victoria v The Commonwealth and Connor (1975) 134 CLR 81 that the three month interval commences on the date on which the Senate rejects or fails to pass the bill. (The High Court has not expressed a definitive view as to the commencement of the three-month period where the Senate passes a bill with amendments 'to which the House will not agree'.) Other factors which may influence the timing are the number of triggers the Government desires, (so that if re-elected, the Government could pass the Bills at a joint sitting of both Houses), and the need to pass other legislation before an election.

Discussions on the possibility of a double dissolution being held in 1998 have focussed on the Native Title Amendment Bill 1997, but in fact there are other possible triggers, such as the Workplace Relations Amendment Bill 1997, rejected by the Senate on 21 October 1997. If this bill is to be used as a trigger, the three-month interval will have occurred by the time the House of Representatives resumes sitting on 2 March 1998. The Senate passed the Native Title Amendment Bill 1997 on 5 December 1997 with amendments to which the House resolved on 6 December that it would not agree. If it is assumed that the formal disagreement required by section 57 arose no later than 6 December, the House will be able to pass this possible trigger Bill, as well as the others, for the second time after the first week of the Autumn sitting in 1998. The House must then wait for the Senate to consider the bills for the second time. It is only if the Senate again rejects, unacceptably amends or fails to pass any of the possible triggers that the provisions of section 57 may be invoked.

  1. A writ is the formal document authorising the holding of an election.
  2. The High Court held in Vardon v. O'Loghlin (1907) 5 CLR 201 that the term 'election' comprises the whole proceedings from the issue of the writ to the valid return.

 

 

top