Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 34 1997-98

Residential Aged Care: New Fees and Charges

Greg McIntosh
Social Policy Group
23 March 1998


One of the first major social policy reforms announced by the incoming Howard Government was the Aged Care Structural Reform Package. In the context of the 1996-97 Federal Budget the Government announced a series of reforms to residential aged care to take place progressively from 1 July 1997.

The Reform Package

The main elements of the reform package are summarised in Table 1.

This Research Note concentrates only on the fees and charges aspects of the Reform Package.

Since the announcement of the reform strategy in mid-1997 a number of adjustments have been made apparently as a result of protests against some of the proposed changes. The main public debate so far on the reforms has concentrated on the new arrangements for residents classified in the high level of care (nursing home) categories. Many of these residents will now need to pay an accommodation charge (entry contribution) and also higher daily fees dependent on their income. Residents in low level care (hostels) have had to pay entry contributions and daily resident fees for many years based on their income. The reforms to fees and charges essentially aim to bring residents in high level care (nursing homes) into line with residents in low level care.

Table 1: Aged Care Structural Reform Package
  • integration of hostels/nursing homes into one residential aged care system
  • a new single residential classification system (formerly there were two)
  • the introduction of resident accommodation payments (entry contributions) for all residential care (formerly applying to hostels only)
  • income testing of daily resident fees payable for all types of care (formerly applying to hostels only)
  • a new system of accreditation designed to ensure proper standards of care
  • less onerous paperwork requirements on residential facilities
  • improved consumer protection arrangements

In summary form, the new accommodation charge arrangements are as follows:

Accommodation Payment Arrangements

Accommodation Bonds (for residents needing low level hostel care)

  • No limit on the size of the bond but residents must be left with assets of at least $22 500.
  • The maximum amount that the operator can take from the bond is $2600 per annum for a maximum of five years, after which the residual is refunded to the resident. The operator is entitled to retain all income derived from investment of the bond during the period the resident remains in the facility.
  • It can be paid as a lump sum, a periodic payment or a combination of lump sum and periodic payment.
  • The family home is not included in the calculation of net assets if the house is occupied by a partner or dependent child, or if a carer or close relative has lived in the house for the past two years and is eligible for a social security payment.
  • Residents have six months after entry to pay the bond.

Accommodation Charges (for residents needing high level nursing home care)

  • Residents with assets less than $22 500 are exempt from the charge.
  • Maximum amount per annum to be $4380 OR the margin of assets above $22 500 divided by five years-whichever is the lowest.
  • For residents with assets over $44 400 the maximum charge is $12 per day.
  • For residents with assets between $22 500 and $36 000 the maximum daily charge is $6.
  • The charge can only be levied for five years and must be calculated on a daily basis.
  • With the agreement of the operator of the facility the payment of the charge can be deferred and paid from the resident's estate. The Government is presently talking to banks to encourage them to offer reverse mortgage facilities to allow residents to borrow against their homes to pay the charge.
  • Where residents pay the charge by renting out the family home the rental income is not counted for pension purposes, or for income tested fees.

Resident Daily Fees

Table 2 gives brief details of the new Resident Fee arrangements.

Table 2: New Resident Daily Fee Arrangements
  • From 1 March 1998 (with a 28 day grace period) all new residents will pay a base daily care fee ($21.10 for pensioners and $26.40 for non-pensioners).
  • Part-pensioners and non-pensioners will also be required to pay an additional income tested care fee dependent on their income.
  • The maximum amount of the daily care fee is $63.30. To pay this upper level of fee, residents would need to have an annual income in excess of $56 000.

Ongoing Concerns

A key concern, raised not only by residents in aged care facilities but also by others in the general community, is related to the nature of the care provided to residents in high level care. Most residents going into high level care (nursing homes) are very frail and often quite ill. Many of them are only in residential care for short periods (a year or less)(1) and it is argued that elderly people in this situation should be treated in a similar way to patients in public hospitals where accommodation charges are not levied.

There is a strong case for managing and paying for short stay (nursing home type) residents, heavily dependent on health and medical care, differently to others who primarily use residential aged care for 'nursing supported living'.(2)

Another concern, raised particularly by the operators of resident facilities, is related to the capital underfunding of the sector. In recent years governments of both persuasions have provided inadequate capital funding for the nursing home sector. According to some the new accommodation charge arrangements are unlikely to raise enough capital for upgrading and expansion of aged care facilities. The 1994 Gregory Report(3) estimated there was a need for an additional $125 million per year to fulfil the capital requirements of the nursing home sector. The Government estimates that the new accommodation charge will raise that amount by the fourth year of its operation. However, a more recent report(4) estimated that there is likely to be a $1.32 billion capital shortfall ($2.03 billion if the backlog of deferred investments is to be cleared) in the residential aged care industry over the period 1997-98 to 1999-2000. If the estimates in this latter report are accurate, Australia is likely to be faced with a further decline in the standard of residential aged care, notwithstanding the introduction of a new user-pays regime.

  1. According to the Australian Catholic Health Care Association (Residential Aged Care Daily Fees: Position Paper, February 1998 p.2): 'up to 60% of nursing home residents either return to hospital or die within the first year.'
  2. ibid., p.2
  3. Gregory, R.G., Review of the Structure of Nursing Home Funding Arrangements: Stage 2, Aged and Community Care Service Development and Evaluation Reports, Number 12, May 1994.
  4. HESTA Report Into Strategic Capital Needs of the Residential Aged Care Industry 1997-2003, Tasman Asia Pacific in association with Economic Insights, June 1997.

 

top