Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 20 1997-98

Australia's Mobile Telephony Revolution

John Kain
Economics, Commerce and Industrial Relations Group
1 December 1997


There is a growing appreciation of the increasing dominance of telecommunications in facilitating all aspects of national economic activity. It also has significant broader roles in cementing the social and cultural fabric of the community(1). Within the Australian telecommunications sector, mobile telephony is assuming a rapidly growing prominence and since the late 1980s, has expanded significantly in its own right as well as relative to the fixed telephone market, even though the latter has also shown marked growth over these years. These trends are illustrated in Chart 1.

Chart 1: Cellular Mobile and Fixed Telephone Subscribers in Australia, 1986-98

The size of the Australian mobile telephony market is estimated (by IBIS Business Information Service) to grow to some 6.5 million subscribers by the year 2000 representing an average annual growth of 13.7% per annum. This rapid rate of growth is significantly higher than the 5% annual growth rate in fixed network access lines installed by Telstra during the mid 1990s. Telstra has indicated that it expects about 60% of all telephone calls to involve a mobile component by the year 2000. The Telecommunications Strategies Report 1997/1998 forecasts an even faster growth rate of mobiles with 7.5 million to 8.0 million services predicted for the year 2000 representing a penetration of 40 to 45 per cent of the population compared with 24 per cent as at 1996.

Between 1990 and 1995, Australia's share of the world market for mobile telephony rose from approximately 2.6 per cent of all mobile subscribers to around 3.6 per cent, indicating that the rate of growth of mobile telephony in Australia was greater than that of the rest of the world. This can be explained in part by the comparatively lower level of mobile telecommunications tariffs in Australia. A recent OECD study shows that as at January 1996, the representative basket of Australian mobile tariffs was costed at $US645.93 (US $1995 based on purchasing power parities and excluding tax) compared with the OECD simple average figure of $US1168.53(2). Between 1994 and 1996 alone, Australian mobile telephony prices are reported to have declined by 10 per cent on average, this being more substantial than the percentage cuts in the prices of other forms of telephone service such as international direct dial or IDD (corresponding figure is 8 per cent) or STD prices, which declined on average by 8 per cent over the same period(3).

In 1995, Australia had the 4th highest rate of cellular mobile phone penetration among OECD countries (as measured by mobile phone subscribers per unit of population). Only Sweden, Norway and Finland showed higher rates of penetration. The following chart shows the penetration rates for the 'top ten' countries within the OECD.

 Chart 2: Cellular Mobile Subscribers per 100 Inhabitants 1995

The penetration of mobile telephony is indicated by its relative contribution to overall industry turnover. IBIS has estimated that in 1995-96, mobile telephony accounted for some 20 per cent of industry revenues, while local telephony and exchange line rental accounted for 26 per cent and 21 per cent was attributable to domestic long distance telephony. Industry revenue in the year 1995-96 is estimated by IBIS to be $16873 million, of which mobile services accounted for $3465 million. Other major revenue sources included international call receipts and data service.

Another indicator of the rapid growth and increasing penetration of mobile services is the ratio of mobile growth to mainline growth. In Australia this was 39:10 in 1995. This contrasts with the corresponding ratios in the United Kingdom of 21:10, in the United States 10:10, in Sweden 136:10, and in Norway 101:10.

Just why Australians have taken to mobile telephony with such enthusiasm is difficult to say, but it is a phenomenon apparent in our take-up of other leading consumer technologies such as video recording machines. No doubt, the relatively underdeveloped nature of the fixed network and the relative youthfulness of the Australian population profile may be contributing factors. Personal factors which may motivate people to buy mobile phones vary. Factors considered in past Australian research include perceptions that a user of a mobile will be 'taken more seriously in business', that a mobile 'makes me feel busy and efficient', that it makes the user 'appear contemporary, dynamic and innovative' and that a mobile phone 'makes me more attractive to the opposite sex'.

The relative market shares of the three carriers are presented in chart 3 which summarises overall revenues (including both digital and analogue mobile telephony earnings) received from mobile telephone services in 1995-96 (in current prices) for each of the carriers.

Relative market shares as measured in terms of subscriber numbers as at May 1997 are illustrated in chart 4.

The data illustrated below suggests that Telstra enjoys a higher yield per subscriber from its mobile business than do the other carriers.

 Chart 3: Carrier Revenue Shared from Cellular Mobile Services, 1995-96 Chart 4: Carrier Market Shares as Measured by Mobile Service Subscriber Numbers, May 1997


  1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Communications Outlook 1997, Vol. 1, Paris, 1997.
  2. OECD, Communications Outlook 1997, Vol. 1, p 129.
  3. Paul Budde Communication, Telecommunications Strategies Report 1997/1998 p 85.

 

top