Skip to section navigationSkip to content Commonwealth of Australia Coat of Arms Parliament of Australia - Department of the Parliamentary Library
HomeSenateHouse of RepresentativesLive BroadcastingThis Week in Parliament FindFrequently asked questionsContact

Research Note 12 1997-98

The Labour Force Status of Australian Families

Tony Kryger
Statistics Group
17 November 1997

Introduction

This Research Note looks at the changing labour force status of families over the past 13 years (the period that the Australian Bureau of Statistics has been collecting such information). In particular, it looks at the increase in two income families, the high rates of unemployment experienced by some family types and the increase in the number of children living in unemployed family situations.

Family Types

For the past 13 years the two income family has been the dominant family type in Australia. Its significance has also grown over the period, accounting for 33 per cent of all families in 1984 and rising to 40 per cent in 1997. Other families to increase in relative importance have been couple families in which neither partner is working and single parent families. At the same time, couple families in which only one partner is working have fallen in importance over the period from 34 to 23 per cent of all families. (See Chart 1.)

Chart 1. % Distrbution of Families by Labour Force Status

The growing significance of those families in which both partners are working reflects the increase in the participation by women in the workforce. This in turn can largely be attributed to two factors: growth in the services sector of the economy where women are strongly represented and an increase in part-time work opportunities, an arrangement generally favoured by women. The growth of those families in which neither partner is working reflects both the ageing of the population and the increase in the proportion of people taking early retirement.

Family Unemployment Rates

The unemployment rate for a couple family can be calculated by taking the number of unemployed couple families-families in which neither spouse has a job and at least one spouse is actively seeking a job-and expressing this as a proportion of the number of families in which at least one spouse is in the labour force. (For single parent families the rate is expressed in terms of the number of single parents unemployed as a proportion of the number of single parents in the labour force.) On this basis, the unemployment rate is significantly higher for single parent families than for couple families-14.5 per cent compared with 4.0 per cent. It is also higher for families with children than for those without children and slightly higher again for families with multiple children than for those with only one child. (See Chart 2.)

Chart 2. Unemployment Rates for Families, August 1997

The relationship between unemployment and family size can be further broken down if family size is defined in terms of the number of dependants rather than just the number of children under 15. When this is done (see table below), the unemployment rate jumps suddenly to 8 per cent when a couple family has 4 or more dependants.

Couple Families-With Dependants, June 1997

Number of Dependants

Unemployment Rate %

   
0

3.4

1

4.3

2

4.2

3

4.5

4+

8.0

It should be noted that while the high unemployment rates for single parent and large couple families are related to socio-economic disadvantage, they may also be due in part to work disincentives contained in the social security and income tax systems. That is, the payment of sole parent pension and family income assistance may decrease the incentive to work by providing an income unrelated to work and by raising effective tax rates through the phase-out provisions of income assistance. The additional cost of working, in particular child care and travel to and from work, may also act to reduce the incentive to leave income support for work.

Children in Unemployed Parent Families

Almost 700 000 children under the age of 15, are currently (August 1997) living in families where no parent has a job. Just over 200 000 of these children are living in unemployed parent families-families in which neither parent has a job and at least one parent is actively seeking a job. It is a concern that although the number of children has increased by just 7 per cent over the past 13 years, the number of children living in unemployed parent families has increased at more than double this rate at almost 16 per cent. This increase has occurred, despite the fact that the overall unemployment rate is about the same now as it was 13 years ago.

Single Parent Families

The increase in children living in unemployed parent families can be traced to two influences. The first is the dramatic rise in the number of single parent families while the second is the increase in the unemployment rate for these families. Between 1984 and 1997, the number of single parent families (with children under 15) rose from 270 000 to 437 000 while the unemployment rate for these families rose from 14.7 to 16.9 per cent. The combined effect of these influences was a rise of 148 per cent in the number of children living in single parent families where the parent is unemployed. By comparison, the number of couple families with children under 15 years rose only slightly over the period, with a drop in their unemployment rate from 4.7 to 4.4 per cent. Consequently, the number of children living in unemployed couple families actually fell over the 13 year period.

Hence, compared with 1984 there has been a rise in the number of children living in an unemployed family situation. This increase is entirely attributed to the increase in children living in unemployed single parent families.

Unemployment Rates of Wives

The likelihood of a wife being unemployed is strongly associated with the employment status of her husband. In 1997, for example, the unemployment rate for wives with an unemployed husband was 36 per cent, or almost ten times greater than the unemployment rate for wives with an employed husband. High as this figure is however, it is much lower than the corresponding figure 13 years ago when the rate was 47 per cent-reflecting the increase in employment opportunities for women. Nonetheless, these figures are a cause for concern as they show that labour market disadvantage tends to concentrate in certain households.

 

top