"...the Australian polity does not lend itself to labels and capsule characterisations - 'a parliamentary system', 'the Westminster model' the Washminster mutation', and so on. I prefer my emblem:the platypus. It may be implausible, but it works." (p.353)
“It is not that I charge any individual prime minister with undemocratic ambitions, but I do charge that the government and the House in Canberra fail to offer a satisfactory answer to that core question of democratic governance: who guards the guardians?” (p. 347)
“What are the incentives for the Parliament to hold the government accountable after installing it in office? Where are those subordinate distributions of power to which Madison referred, ‘where the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner that each may be a check on the other?” (p. 346)
“It is asking too much to think of the House of Representatives as a law-making place. But perhaps the problem is not with the House but with our expectations.” (p. 246)
The author, Dr Stanley Bach, has written extensively on the United States Congress and other legislatures and has worked as a consultant on parliamentary process in Asia, Africa, South America and Eastern Europe.
For more than 30 years he worked with and provided advice to Senators and Representatives on the operations of the US Congress. From 1988 to 2002 he held the office of Senior Specialist in the Legislative Process for the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress.
In 2002 Dr Bach was awarded a Fulbright Senior Scholar Award to study bicameralism in Australia. While in Canberra he was a Fellow in the Political Science Program of the Research School of Social Sciences at the Australian National University. He was also awarded a fellowship in the Department of the Senate which enabled him to observe the operations of the Commonwealth Parliament at first hand.