Question Time: Questions directed to non-government members

Parliament house flag post

Question Time: Questions directed to non-government members

Posted 29/05/2013 by Sophia Fernandes


In Question Time on 28 May 2013 the Leader of the House, the Hon. Anthony Albanese, moved a Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders (SSSO) to allow the Leader of the Opposition, the Hon. Tony Abbott, to address the House. The SSSO was moved to provide the Leader of the Opposition the opportunity to answer a question during Question Time – a rare and highly unusual occurrence.

The member for Lyne, Rob Oakeshott, directed a question to both the Prime Minister and with the indulgence of the House, to the Leader of the Opposition, regarding the issue of man-made climate change. The Speaker, Anna Burke, ruled that the Leader of the Opposition would not be able to answer the question and would have the opportunity to address the House after Question Time.

Mr Oakeshott in his supplementary question, again, addressed both the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. Speaker Burke reiterated that the standing orders do not provide the opportunity for the Leader of the Opposition to answer questions. This prompted Mr Albanese to move a SSSO to allow the Leader of the Opposition to address the House for no longer than three minutes on climate change. The question on the SSSO was put and passed and Mr Abbott addressed the House.

According to Standing order 99, it is possible to ask a question of another Member who is not a Minister or Parliamentary Secretary:
99. Questions to other Members   
During Question Time, a Member may ask a question orally of another Member who is not a Minister (or Parliamentary Secretary­). Questions must relate to a bill, motion, or other business of the House or of a committee, for which the Member asked is responsible.
House of Representatives Practice states that, ‘only rarely are questions directed to private Members, and even then they have often been disallowed for contravention of the strict limitations imposed by standing orders and practice’ (p.551). It goes on to provide a list of examples of questions directed to private members, Leaders of the Opposition and Deputy Leaders of the Opposition, on issues such as party policies, and statements made inside or outside the House, which have been ruled out of order.

Of interest are the instances where Leaders of the Opposition have in fact been asked questions about private Member’s bills they had introduced and who were given the opportunity to respond.

During Question Time on 26 September 1995, Mr Abbott asked the then Leader of the Opposition, Mr Howard, a question regarding a private Member’s bill that Mr Howard had introduced. This question was ruled in order and Mr Howard responded. On 28 September 1995, Mr Abbott again asked Mr Howard another question about Mr Howard’s private Member’s bill. After these two instances, the House voted to suspend the operation of Standing order 143 –the order at the time that allowed for questions to members other than ministers– for the remainder of that period of sittings.

In 1996, after a change of government, member for Watson, Mr McLeay asked the then Leader of the Opposition, Mr Beazley, a question about a private Member’s bill that he had introduced under the now operational Standing order 143.

In 1996, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Procedure inquired and reported on the operation of Standing order 143. It concluded that the Standing order should be retained as, ‘private members must be responsible for the business they bring before the House and should be able to be questioned about it. The provision has been used sparingly over the years and for the most part has not been abused.’ The report also provided a list of the 18 occasions which Standing order 143 had been used.

Standing order 99 provides a tighter ambit by which private Members may be asked and respond to questions during Question Time. In yesterday’s instance, Mr Oakeshott’s question did not meet the requirements of the Standing order, prompting a SSSO to allow for Mr Abbott to respond.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare policy elections welfare reform school education Australian Defence Force health financing higher education emissions trading indigenous Australians women private health insurance people trafficking Employment illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics United Nations Asia Afghanistan disability income management Middle East Medicare sport health forced labour United States federal budget Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health criminal law transport aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme corruption pensions public service reform children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy terrorism transparency research and development Mental health welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion human rights paternalism integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly national security smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top