Is this the end of coal seam gas for now?

Parliament house flag post

Is this the end of coal seam gas for now?

Posted 5/03/2013 by Alex St John

Coal seam gas (CSG) has become a divisive issue in recent times, particularly in rural and regional areas of Queensland and New South Wales. Despite the regulation of CSG being primarily a State responsibility, several private members have introduced bills that aim to exert greater Commonwealth controls over CSG. This FlagPost will examine the latest bill, which was introduced into the House of Representatives on the 11th of February. It could have the effect of stopping all new coal seam gas developments across Australia for at least two years.

CSG (as well as large-scale coal mining) has been particularly polarizing in agricultural areas, such as the Hunter Valley in NSW and the Darling Downs in QLD. CSG proponents (such as Santos and AGL) argue that CSG is necessary to secure Australia’s continuing natural gas supply. Proponents also point to the economic benefits derived from exporting CSG as liquefied natural gas.

CSG forms underground as buried organic matter decomposes, forming coal and gas over millions of years. This methane gas adheres to fractures and pores in the coal and is kept in place by high water pressure. When a well is drilled into the coal seam, water is removed and the pressure is lowered, allowing the gas to come away from the coal. This means that a CSG well produces gas and a large volume of water.

Opponents are concerned that the extraction of CSG interferes with underground water and risks contaminating water supplies. Some opponents claim that CSG withdraws too much water from aquifers, endangering agricultural activities which rely on this groundwater. Other opponents of CSG highlight the impact of CSG on cropping and grazing land and complain that farmers have little power to control CSG activity on their land.

The Commonwealth has been reluctant to interfere in the regulation of CSG by the states. Although the Commonwealth and five jurisdictions (Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and the Northern Territory) signed the National Partnership Agreement on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development, this agreement only commits the parties to seek advice from the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas, established through legislation in 2012. The Agreement is not legally binding and does not restrict the ability of the states to licence and regulate development of CSG. The lack of nationally consistent policy on CSG means that the regulation of CSG varies considerably between jurisdictions.

In response to concerns that environmental and social impacts were not adequately addressed by the states, several Private Members’ bills have been introduced to attempt to force the Commonwealth to regulate CSG more closely. A bill introduced in 2011 by Senator Larissa Waters sought to give landowners more rights in their dealings with CSG companies. A bill introduced by Mr Tony Windsor MP and another bill introduced by Senator Waters both sought to mandate the approval of the federal Environment Minister for CSG (and other mining and petroleum) activities which extracted large volumes of underground water. These bills have not been proceeded with by the Parliament.

The latest bill that attempts to place federal controls on CSG, introduced by the Hon. Bob Katter MP, would create an offence under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 if: a person takes an action that is or results in ‘drilling through or into and aquifer… for the purposes of, or connected with, coal seam gas extraction’, within two years of the commencement of the bill. Violators could be fined up to $200,000 for an individual and $2 million for a corporation.

Although the bill may be intended to prevent drilling into aquifers used for agricultural or drinking water purposes, which are common in the Great Artesian Basin, any coal seam that produces CSG also produces water and could be considered an aquifer in the geological sense. The McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Geology and Mineralogy defines an aquifer as ‘A permeable body of rock capable of yielding quantities of groundwater to wells or springs’. Other authorities (including the National Water Commission) give similar definitions. As coal is a sedimentary rock and coal seams are evidently permeable to water, it appears that any coal seam possesses the necessary elements of an aquifer.

The implication of this is that the Bill becomes a de facto ban on new production of any CSG. If it is illegal to drill into an aquifer for CSG activity, it then becomes illegal to drill for CSG at all. This would also apply to exploration wells, drilled to find and evaluate the status of gas deposit. It is unclear if this is an intended consequence of the bill or not. Existing, already drilled wells would not be affected. Any expansion of existing fields could not be permitted and any new developments would be off the table for two years. Needless to say, this would stop the recently approved Gloucester CSG project.

However, whether the Bill progresses in the Parliament remains to be seen. Both the Labor and Liberal parties have supported CSG in the past and have given no hints that their official policies are changing.


  • 21/01/2014 2:02 PM
    Alex St John said:

    Thank you for your question and comment, Martin. The process you refer to in your question is known as hydraulic fracturing (sometimes called ‘fraccing’ or ‘fracking’), where a fluid is injected into the well at high pressure to fracture the coal or rock and stimulate gas flow. The fluid is composed of water (mainly), sand, and relatively small amounts of a number of chemicals. Fracturing is especially controversial in CSG development, with a lot of claims and counter-claims being made. Unfortunately I can’t comprehensively deal with these here - but watch out for a background note in the near future which will deal with unconventional gas, fracturing and related issues in detail. However, I should point out that not all CSG wells are fractured – the industry estimates that between 10-40 percent of wells in Queensland will need to be fractured. Secondly, whether fracturing pollutes aquifers is contentious – fracturing is meant to be carried out so that aquifers are protected by a cement and steel well casing. It’s not unknown for these casings to fail though. Lastly, CSG wells produce a lot of water, which contains large amounts of salt and other naturally-occurring contaminants from the coal seam. This happens irrespective of whether fracturing is used, and management of this water is one of the biggest challenges for the responsible development of CSG.

  • 21/01/2014 2:02 PM
    Martin Butterfield said:

    Is it not the case that most, if not all, CSG wells also insert chemicals to encourage/force the rock to fracture thus releasing more gas? The concerning implications of this are: (1) that the chemicals infiltrate the aquifers and (2) the water which comes out of the wells is highly polluted.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament elections climate change social security women welfare reform taxation Indigenous Australians Australian Defence Force welfare policy school education higher education private health insurance health financing emissions trading Senate Australian Bureau of Statistics employment people trafficking Asia statistics Middle East illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Australian Public Service income management Medicare disability Sport United Nations environment industrial relations constitution transport politics criminal law Afghanistan health forced labour food public service reform aged care aid Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Carbon Pricing Mechanism dental health international relations governance regulation Fair Work Act voting law enforcement electoral reform OECD Australian Electoral Commission WADA child protection poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention 43rd Parliament slavery health system leadership domestic violence parliamentary procedure International Women's Day accountability defence capability multiculturalism ASADA Australian Federal Police labour force people smuggling debt New Zealand Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme political parties coal seam gas Human rights crime China Census election results UK Parliament Papua New Guinea banking corruption pensions children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment Youth Allowance sea farers United Kingdom energy food labelling Australian economy violence against women vocational education and training military history by-election High Court skilled migration mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations youth paid parental leave same sex relationships customs planning doping health risks Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy ANZUS Rural and regional trade unions Foreign affairs election timetable Indigenous royal commission Productivity firearms public policy Population ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union family assistance United Nations Security Council forestry Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report social inclusion paternalism environmental law US presidential election nutrition ODA Defence sitting days electoral divisions Southeast Asia administrative law universities TAFE Ireland citizenship asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing water health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution marine pollution sustainability prisons police deaths in custody electoral margins electoral pendulum electoral redistribution redistribution NSW redistribution WA redistribution ACT electoral boundaries ASEAN Sustainable Development Goals Double dissolution Senators safety vehicles MYEFO Pathology tertiary education Taiwan Xi Ma meeting family violence government financial advisers financial planners Financial System Inquiry Murray Inquiry China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers First speech defence budget submarines workers Somalia GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top