Streamlining Defence Acquisitions: the UK experiment

Parliament house flag post

Streamlining Defence Acquisitions: the UK experiment

Posted 28/06/2013 by Noemi Murphy

The struggle to control the cost and improve the effectiveness of acquiring defence capability has taxed successive Australian governments—but Australia is not alone. A new UK Government white paper outlines a plan to manage the purchasing of defence capability very differently to most other countries by stating its intention to move to a Government Owned Contractor Operated (GOCO) model for running the Defence Equipment and Support Organisation (DE&S).



It sets out the major reasons the DE&S struggles to provide capability on time and within budget and suggests a variety of possible solutions while noting the Secretary of State for Defence’s preference for the GOCO model. Critics of Australia’s Defence Materiel Organisation (DMO) will be familiar with the three ‘root causes’ of underperformance:
  • the DE&S attempts to carry out too many tasks and many of the capabilities are more highly specified than is necessary (referred to as ‘overheating’), compounded by the ‘conspiracy of optimism’ around cost and deadlines
  • an unstable interface between the MOD and DE&S in which changes are made to projects at various times during the development of the capability and by various people. The DE&S is not truly empowered to say no when it is unhappy with these changes and
  • the DE&S lacks the proper range of people with skills in project management as well as commercial and financial expertise and engineers. The report states that these ‘have a much higher market value than can be recognised within the civil service framework’.
This move to the GOCO model was first flagged by the Chief of Defence Materiel, Bernard Gray, in his 2009 report on defence acquisition reform. Gray’s conclusions were reinforced in a 2011 report which agreed with the previous report and noted the need for system-wide transformation.
 
If indeed the British Government decides to privatise the DE&S, it would be an unprecedented and potentially controversial move because all acquisition, from procurement to whole-of-life support and disposal, will be organised by a private contractor instead of a government department.
 
In general, the acquisition of military capability in the US, UK and Australia is handled by the public service. For example, Australian capability acquisitions are organised by two sections within the Department of Defence. Initially, the Defence Capability Group (CDG) researches capability needs. Once a suitable capability has been developed or sourced, the project is transferred to the DMO. The projects are managed by DMO Project Managers who closely collaborate with private contractors to deliver the desired capability.
 
In a bid to cut costs and streamline processes, the government proposes to transform the DE&S into a GOCO organisation over which the UK Government would retain strategic control, but which has substantial operating freedom and is incentivised through a performance-based contract. Aside from the fact that the contractor might be foreign-owned (provided it is registered in the UK), little else is known about how such a privatised system would work. In a February 2013 report released by the Commons Defence Select Committee, British MPs were highly critical of the move to privatise DE&S and raised 34 points they believed needed addressing.
 
Moreover, many critics have highlighted that project scope and budgets often change due to shifting requirements and it remains doubtful whether a private company would have the flexibility to cater for such changing needs. However, the UK Government believes that accommodating change has significantly contributed to cost blowouts and is a primary reason for creating a more rigid system. The money-saving element of this initiative is also being questioned, with critics arguing project costs will likely rise and parliamentary scrutiny of public expenditure and accountability will be removed.
 
The US Department of Defense is also concerned about the GOCO initiative, particularly because US military secrets will necessarily be divulged during the British acquisition of US military technologies and capabilities. The DoD and the UK MoD have established a small interagency team to study the impact of the change and how it might best be handled.
 
To argue the case for the GOCO model, Gray cites the British privatisation of nuclear weapons development. However, a study released in 2012 by the Royal United Services Institute concluded:


The DE&S acquisition and management function in defence is much more diverse and complex than the development, production and support of nuclear weapons. Thus the GOCO model of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, where industry works under close supervision on a limited range of tasks, cannot be taken as a model.

The same study highlighted that the US had previously unsuccessfully attempted a similar initiative and had returned to the traditional procurement model at great cost and time delays.
 
The privatisation of DE&S was due to be completed by 2013, but is now expected to be completed next year. Currently, requests for tenders are being advertised for lead companies. Following a cost benefit analysis of the new model versus the status quo, a decision about the future of the DE&S is expected to be made in 2014.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations health financing Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading dental health Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service constitution International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs health reform Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing health system money laundering asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency productivity human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits

Show all
Show less
Back to top