Countries trading greenhouse gas emissions

Parliament house flag post

Countries trading greenhouse gas emissions

Posted 6/06/2013 by Anita Talberg

Over the last three years, the global carbon market has more than doubled in volume but almost halved in value. In that time a further eight countries, states or cities have adopted a carbon market as their primary means for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Yet the price for one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent has dropped by as much as 100 per cent in some markets.

A new paper from the Parliamentary Library provides a basic overview of the size and value of the global carbon market and details exactly which countries and regions are covered by a mandatory emissions trading scheme (ETS). Here is a snapshot of that paper.

The table below provides details of all mandatory legislated ETSs. The top five, in terms of expected size and volume of trade, are the schemes in the European Union (EU), South Korea, California, Australia and Quebec. In 2015, these five schemes will require the surrender of permits representing an estimated 3200 megatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Mandatory legislated ETSs

NameDates and targetPer cent of emissions coveredIndustries coveredAssistance to exposed industriesPermit price
Kyoto Protocol (second commitment period)1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020

13% -18% below 1990 levels by 2020
Not knownEnergy, industrial processes, solvents and other product use, agriculture, waste and land-use, land-use change and forestryNoneCERs are trading at less than €0.08
($A0.10, April 2013)
EU ETS-Phase 1 (2005-2007):
Trial phase with modest abatement aims

-Phase 2 (2008-2012): 8% below 1990 levels

-Phase 3 (2013-2020): 21% on 2005 levels
-Phase 1: 40%

-Phase 2: 40%

-Phase 3: 43%
-Phase 1: power generators and energy-intensive industry (only CO2)

-Phase 2: power stations & other combustion plants, oil refineries, coke ovens, iron & steel plants & factories making cement, glass, lime, bricks, ceramics, pulp, paper & board (mainly CO2 but some N2O optional)

- 2012: add aviation 
-Phase 3: add petrochemicals, ammonia & aluminium + N2O emissions from production of nitric, adipic & glyocalic acid production & PFCs from aluminium sector + emissions from CCS
-Phase 1: 95% of permits for free

-Phase 2: 90% of permits for free

-Phase 3: less than 50% for free; none for the power sector; industry get free permits up to 80% of benchmark; heavy emitters get free permits up to 100% of benchmark
Curently about €3.9

($A4.90,
April 2013)
Australia's Carbon Pricing MechanismStarted in 2012 and targets 5% below 2000 levels by 2020About 60%Electricity generation, mining, industrial processes, fugitive emissions, non-legacy waste and construction66% of permits for free to moderately emissions intensive activities and 94.5% for highly emissions intensive activities.Starting at a fixed $A23 for 2012–13
NZ ETSStarted in 2008 and targets 10% to 20% below 2000 levels by 2020.About 50%- 2008: forestry

- 2010: liquid fossil fuels, stationary energy & industrial processes
All permits free to emissions-intensive, trade exposed, some free to forestryAbout $NZ2

($A1.60,
April 2013)
Swiss ETSStarted in 2008 an targets 20% below 1990 levels by 2020Not knownSame as EU ETSNone to the power sector; Free permits to EITE based on benchmarks of industry-wide emissions intensity and an adjustment factor based on relocation risk of different industriesNot known
South Korean ETSWill start in 2015 and target 45% below 2005 levels by 2020About 60%All industry, buildings & power generation100% of permits for free, decreasing gradually from 2018N/A
Kazakhstan ETSStarted in 2013 and targets 15% below 1990 levels by 2020About 80%Manufacturing, mining, metallurgy, chemicals, agriculture & transportNot knownNot known
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Started in 2009 and targets 10% on 2009 levels by 2018About 25%Power generationNoneAbout $US2.55

($A2.50
April 2013)
Californian cap-and-tradeStarted in 2013 and targets 1990 levels by 2020About 35% 2013–15

About 85% from 2015
Electricity generation and industrial sourcesFree permits for 90% of average emissions, based on a benchmark. Amount of free permits decreases annually Around $US14.50 ($A14.10
April 2013) There is an auction floor price of $US10.71
Quebec cap-and-tradestarted in 2013 and targets 20% on 1990 levels by 202025 to 30% 2013–15

75-80% from 2015
Power generation, mining and manufacturingFree allocation of 80% or 100% depending on the type of emissionsN/A
There is an auction floor price of $C10.50 (+inflation) increasing by 5% annually.
There is also an allowance reserve to cap price at $C40 to $C50
Alberta-Based Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program Started in 2007 and targets a 12% reduction in emissions intensity of covered entitiesAbout 50%Power and heat generation, industryN/ABetween $C8 and $C12 in 2010
Tokyo cap-and-tradeStarted in 2010 abd targets 6% below base-levels by 2014 and 17% by 2019About 20% of total Tokyo emissionsBuildings and industrial facilities from industrial, commercial, residential and transport sectorsAll permits are allocated freeAround $US100 ($A95.50
Dec 2012)
Saitama cap-and-tradeStarted in 2011 and targets 7% below base-year levels by 2014Not knownSame as TokyoAll permits are allocated freeNot known




Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

immigration refugees elections taxation asylum Parliament criminal law election results Australian Bureau of Statistics social security disability citizenship Indigenous Australians political parties United Kingdom UK Parliament Census statistics banking early childhood education Middle East Australian foreign policy OECD Australian Electoral Commission voting mental health Employment military history by-election election timetable China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Productivity Defence income management asylum seekers High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title Senate ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories leadership aid Papua New Guinea emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding Electoral reform politics refugees immigration asylum Canada procurement Australian Public Service firearms Indigenous health constitution High Court e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament women 2015 International Women's Day public policy ABS Population Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade skilled migration Private health insurance Medicare Financial sector EU national security fuel China soft power education violence against women domestic violence Fiji India Disability Support Pension disability employment welfare reform Tasmania Antarctica China Diplomacy Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency Sport ASADA Federal Court WADA ADRV by-elections state and territories terrorism terrorist groups Bills corruption anti-corruption integrity fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform science innovation research and development transport standards Afghanistan Australian Defence Force NATO United States social media Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism higher education Higher Education Loan Program HECS welfare policy pensions social services welfare ASIO Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Australian Secret Intelligence Service intelligence community Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 sexual abuse online grooming sexual assault of minors labour force workers

Show all
Show less
Back to top