Is doping in sport a crime? (doping in sports pt. 5)

Parliament house flag post

Is doping in sport a crime? (doping in sports pt. 5)

Posted 24/04/2013 by Jaan Murphy

The previous FlagPost in this series explored the dual use of evidence in both sports tribunals and criminal proceedings.

Whilst it is commonly understood that doping is prohibited in sport, is it also a criminal offence?

This FlagPost examines the circumstances in which an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) is also a crime in Australia and the sanctions imposed by the criminal justice system for those offences. 

The Criminal Justice System

Unlike a number of other countries, Australia does not have any sports-specific legislation creating criminal offences specifically relating to doping in sport. However, the Commonwealth, states and territories have all enacted legislation which criminalises certain actions or conduct which also constitute an ADRV. Primarily these are centred on:
  • trafficking of substances that appear on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) World Anti-Doping Code Prohibited List (List)
  • the use or administration of a substance on the List without appropriate medical or therapeutic justification
  • the possession of a substance on the List without lawful justification (e.g. for medical reasons) or
  • aiding, abetting, or concealing any of the above.

Selected examples of applicable Australian criminal laws

In Australia, the criminal laws that potentially cover conduct associated with an ADRV commonly relate to trafficking, possession and importation of substances that appear on the List.  

Trafficking, possession and importation offences

By way of example, Part 9.1 of the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995 criminalises both the trafficking and possession of certain prohibited substances, a small number of which are on the List. Depending on the amount of the substance trafficked or possessed, the offence is punishable by up to life imprisonment and a fine of up to 7,500 penalty units ($1,275,000). 
Under Part XIII of the Customs Act 1901, Regulation 5 and Schedule 7A of Customs (Prohibited Imports) Regulations 1956, the importation of a number of substances on the List (including EPO and Human Growth Hormone) is a criminal offence punishable by up to five years imprisonment and a fine of up to 1,000 penalty units ($170,000).

Therapeutic goods offences

The Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (TG Act) creates a number of offences relating to therapeutic goods, many of which are on the List. For example, the importation of therapeutic goods into Australia without the appropriate permit is a criminal offence punishable by up to five years imprisonment and a fine of up to 4,000 penalty units ($680,000). A large number of the prohibited substances on the List are classified as therapeutic goods under the TG Act.   

State and territory laws

The Commonwealth is not the only jurisdiction to criminalise the possession or trafficking of substances and methods on the List. As an example, the table below highlights the relevant penalties for the possession, use, administration or trafficking of steroids and similar substances. 


Relevant Act



Criminalises the possession, trafficking, use and administration of steroids. Schedule 1 lists a large number of Anabolic Steroids, most of which appear on the List.
Imprisonment for 5 years and/or a fine of up to 500 penalty units ($55,000)
Criminalises the possession and trafficking of steroids.  Links key definitions to the TG Act.
Imprisonment for 2 years and/or a fine of up to 20 penalty units ($2,200)
Criminalises the possession and trafficking of steroids.  Links key definitions to the Drugs Misuse Regulation 1987 which includes “any other anabolic and androgenic steroidal agent”.
Imprisonment for 20 years for trafficking and possession.
Criminalises the possession and trafficking of steroids.  Schedule 11 includes a large number of steroids, many of which are on the List.
For trafficking:  imprisonment for 15 years.  For possession: 5 years imprisonment and/or a fine of up to 400 penalty units ($56,336)
Criminalises the trafficking, possession and use of steroids.  Links key definitions to the Uniform Poisons Standard which includes steroids, and incorporates an extensive list of substances, many of which are on the List.
For trafficking: imprisonment for up to 10 years and/or a fine of $50,000.  For possession, administration or supply: 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $2,000.
Criminalises the trafficking, possession and use of steroids.  Links key definitions to the Uniform Poisons Standard which includes steroids, and incorporates an extensive list of substances, many of which are on the List.
For trafficking: imprisonment for up to 25 years and/or a fine of $100,000.  For possession: 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of $2,000
Criminalises the trafficking, possession and use of steroids.  Links key definitions to the Uniform Poisons Standard which includes steroids, and incorporates an extensive list of substances, many of which are on the List.
For trafficking and possession: imprisonment for 5 years and/or a fine of 500 penalty units ($70,500).
For use: imprisonment for 2 years and/or a fine of 500 penalty units ($70,500).
Criminalises the trafficking, possession, use and administration of steroids.
For trafficking: imprisonment for 21 years.  For possession, use or administration: 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine of 50 penalty units ($6,500).

Other criminal sanctions

It has also been suggested by some commentators that as a professional athlete’s ability to earn a living is based on their physical or athletic ability, the use of performance enhancing drugs (PEDS) may be regarded as a dishonest act. The offence of fraud is commonly defined in various Commonwealth and state and territory laws as where a person a financial advantage, property, services, a benefit, or an advantage, dishonestly or by deceit. Hence it is argued that the use of PEDS by an athlete to secure a scholarship, contract or other benefit could be prosecuted as fraud, attracting terms of imprisonment.

Finally, it has been noted that athletes and teams engaged in the use of prohibited substances have an unfair advantage, which can be exploited on sports betting markets by persons with inside information. A previous FlagPost explored the issues surrounding betting, match fixing and corruption in sport. The next FlagPost in this series looks at countries that have criminalised doping in sport.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top