Higher education savings - students pick up the bill

Parliament house flag post

Higher education savings - students pick up the bill

Posted 19/04/2013 by Leonie Doyle

The government’s Statement on Higher Education announces savings measures in three areas. Reaction from, and on behalf of, the higher education sector has been negative. The peak body representing universities, Universities Australia, has condemned the cuts.

Yet it is not the universities that will bear the brunt of the savings but their students.

Of the expected $2.33 billion in savings:

  • $230 million is coming from removal of HECS discounts and repayment bonuses
  • $900 million is coming from the two-year, 2 per cent efficiency dividend being applied to university funding, and
  • $1,200 million is coming from conversion of the Student Start-up Scholarship from a benefit to a loan.
Only one of these measures directly affects universities.

The other two affect students

Removal of the 10 per cent discount on upfront payment of HECS-HELP will tend to affect wealthier students (or their families). In 2010, around 17 per cent of university students paid upfront and received a 20 per cent discount on HECS. (The discount was reduced to 10 per cent in 2012.) This savings measure targets students who have the capacity to pay upfront. They will no longer get a reward for doing so.

At the other end of the spectrum, converting Student Start-up Scholarships into income-contingent loans targets students who probably don’t have the capacity to pay. Announced in the 2009-10 Budget, this scholarship was 'for all university students receiving income support' (this includes Youth Allowance, Austudy, or ABSTUDY Living Allowance).

Students who qualified would receive $2,254 in 2010, indexed thereafter based on the CPI. They could use this money to pay for costs associated with starting university – computer equipment, text books and the like. The government estimated a cost of $1,259.6 million over four years.

However, by the time legislation had passed the 2010 scholarship was reduced by almost half. Instead of $2,254, students would receive $1,300 in the first year ($2,128 in the second year). The reduction was made so that a package of related measures would be revenue neutral.

In 2011, the value of the Student Start-Up Scholarship was reduced again to $2,050 for 2012 (from $2,198 in 2011). The government confirmed in Senate Estimates that 177,000 higher education students would receive $150 less per year.

Pay back time

This week’s announcement means that students receiving a Student Start-up Scholarship in future will have to pay it back via the Higher Education Loan Program (HELP). The government saves $1.2 billion, although this figure will effectively be added to the amount of outstanding HELP debt, which now stands at more than $26.3 billion.

Even taking into account these cuts, the government has shown that overall funding for higher education is still increasing.

Universities were the subject of savings measures in the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook including a trimming of .5 billion in research funding. The latest measures target universities again, this time through an efficiency dividend.

But it is their students who are being asked to pay most of the bill, either sooner (if they pay upfront) or later (via the tax system).

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




immigration refugees elections taxation asylum Parliament criminal law election results Australian Bureau of Statistics social security disability citizenship Indigenous Australians political parties United Kingdom UK Parliament Census statistics banking early childhood education Middle East Australian foreign policy OECD Australian Electoral Commission voting mental health Employment military history by-election election timetable China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Productivity Defence income management asylum seekers High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title Senate ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories leadership aid Papua New Guinea emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding Electoral reform politics refugees immigration asylum Canada procurement Australian Public Service firearms Indigenous health constitution High Court e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament women 2015 International Women's Day public policy ABS Population Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade skilled migration Private health insurance Medicare Financial sector EU national security fuel China soft power education violence against women domestic violence Fiji India Disability Support Pension disability employment welfare reform Tasmania Antarctica China Diplomacy Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency Sport ASADA Federal Court WADA ADRV by-elections state and territories terrorism terrorist groups Bills corruption anti-corruption integrity fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform science innovation research and development transport standards Afghanistan Australian Defence Force NATO United States social media Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism higher education Higher Education Loan Program HECS welfare policy pensions social services welfare ASIO Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Australian Secret Intelligence Service intelligence community Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 sexual abuse online grooming sexual assault of minors labour force workers

Show all
Show less
Back to top