‘Grandfather’ arrangements for PPS – entitlement or inequity?

Parliament house flag post

‘Grandfather’ arrangements for PPS – entitlement or inequity?

Posted 11/04/2013 by Carol Ey

Since it was announced in the 2012-13 Budget that ‘grandfathering’ arrangements for single parents receiving Parenting Payment Single (PPS) would cease on 1 January 2013, there has been considerable concern expressed at the plight of these recipients who would see their weekly income support payments reduced by over $130 per fortnight for those on the maximum rate, and in some cases not be entitled to any income support and associated benefits if they had high enough earnings. However there appears to have been little recognition that these changes also mean that those who have been in receipt of PPS continuously since June 2006 are now being treated equally to the majority of single parents on income support.

‘Grandfathering’ arrangements are common in the social security system. They arise when changes to the conditions for a payment mean that some current recipients would be worse off. They are therefore allowed to continue under their existing arrangements until they move to another payment (for example, the Age Pension) or cease to be eligible through a change in their circumstances (such as getting a job or single parents who partner). For example, Partner Allowance was closed to new entrants on 20 September 2003 but there were still 17 147 recipients as at June 2011. Similarly when the work test for the Disability Support Pension (DSP) was changed in July 2006 from a threshold of those unable to work 30 hours per week being eligibile for DSP (with others placed on Newstart) to only those unable to work 15 hours per week, people already in receipt of DSP remained on the payment and were not reassessed against the new tighter work test.

The rationale for preserving the conditions of existing recipients is that it may be difficult for people to adjust to changed conditions, and in particular a reduced level of payment, when they have been used to living on the previous arrangements. However it does lead to inequity where those who have applied for a payment prior to a particular date may be significantly better off than people in the same situation who apply after the date. In the case of DSP, a single adult who was assessed as being able to work 20 hours per week and claimed DSP on 30 June 2006 would have been $89 per fortnight better off than someone in the same situation who claimed on 1 July and was placed on Newstart. If both remained on payment since then, the difference in fortnightly pay would now be nearly $300.

For PPS the situation is slightly different. While two single parents each with a youngest child aged 10 who applied for PPS on 30 June and 1 July 2006 respectively would have been treated differently at the time (the first would have received PPS but with participation requirements until their youngest child reached 16, while the second would have been placed on Newstart), for those with younger children there was no immediate impact. Two single parents each with a four year old child, one claiming before and the other after 1 July 2006 would have both received PPS initially. The difference would have been that the one who claimed before 1 July would have continued to receive PPS until their youngest child turned 16 (although with participation requirements once the child turned 8), while the other recipient would have been moved onto Newstart when their youngest child turned 8.

So for PPS recipients the argument about existing recipients having difficulty adjusting to a lower income level is not relevant as at some stage all recipients would have been moved to Newstart – the only change has been the age of their youngest child at the time this happened. Therefore the outcry about how single parents will find it difficult to live on Newstart should not be restricted to the estimated 122 630 who have been effected by the 2012-13 Budget measures. In fact, this represents only about one-third of those currently receiving PPS – the remainder would have lost eligibility for the payment once their youngest child reached 8 even without the latest changes. Of the 122 630, around a half lost eligibility for PPS on 1 January 2013, and will join the estimated 48 000 principal carer parents who were already receiving Newstart. The remainder still have a child under the age of 8 and hence will only lose eligibility once their youngest child turns 8 – that is, under the same conditions as the other 200 000 PPS recipients.


  • 21/01/2014 1:58 PM
    Buster said:

    If only the media were able to understand this before they started spouting off about all single parents being affected. I don't recall as much of an outcry in 2006, but then there wasn't such a big payment rate difference between Newstart and PPS then. To me the argument should be about how low the Newstart payment is in comparison to other income support payments, something that few from any side are willing to talk about.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament elections climate change social security women welfare reform taxation Indigenous Australians Australian Defence Force welfare policy school education higher education private health insurance health financing emissions trading Senate Australian Bureau of Statistics employment people trafficking Asia statistics Middle East illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Australian Public Service income management Medicare disability Sport United Nations environment industrial relations constitution transport politics criminal law Afghanistan health forced labour food public service reform aged care aid Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Carbon Pricing Mechanism dental health international relations governance regulation Fair Work Act voting law enforcement electoral reform OECD Australian Electoral Commission WADA child protection poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention 43rd Parliament slavery health system leadership domestic violence parliamentary procedure International Women's Day accountability defence capability multiculturalism ASADA Australian Federal Police labour force people smuggling debt New Zealand Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme political parties coal seam gas Human rights crime China Census election results UK Parliament Papua New Guinea banking corruption pensions children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment Youth Allowance sea farers United Kingdom energy food labelling Australian economy violence against women vocational education and training military history by-election High Court skilled migration mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations youth paid parental leave same sex relationships customs planning doping health risks Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy ANZUS Rural and regional trade unions Foreign affairs election timetable Indigenous royal commission Productivity firearms public policy Population ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union family assistance United Nations Security Council forestry Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report social inclusion paternalism environmental law US presidential election nutrition ODA Defence sitting days electoral divisions Southeast Asia administrative law universities TAFE Ireland citizenship asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing water health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution marine pollution sustainability prisons police deaths in custody electoral margins electoral pendulum electoral redistribution redistribution NSW redistribution WA redistribution ACT electoral boundaries ASEAN Sustainable Development Goals Double dissolution Senators safety vehicles MYEFO Pathology tertiary education Taiwan Xi Ma meeting family violence government financial advisers financial planners Financial System Inquiry Murray Inquiry China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers First speech defence budget submarines workers Somalia GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top