Australia wins seat on United Nations Security Council: what next?

Parliament house flag post

Australia wins seat on United Nations Security Council: what next?

Posted 19/10/2012 by Nina Markovic


Image source: United Nations
In the early hours of this morning (local time), Australia received 140 votes from United Nations General Assembly members to secure a seat on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) for its 2013–14 term. The result has been welcomed by both the Government and the Opposition. Australia’s Foreign Minister, Senator Bob Carr, has described the win as a tribute to Australia’s global standing: ‘it’s the world saying, we see Australia as a good country, a fine global citizen’, he said, thanking Pacific, African and Caribbean nations in particular for their support.

The 15-member UNSC is the principal organ under the UN Charter responsible for maintaining international peace and security. It is the primary mediation body during major international crises and is responsible for overseeing UN peacekeeping operations. Its powers also include authorising the use of force and binding sanctions, proscribing terrorist organisations, and appointing special investigators to examine critical issues that affect global security. Australia, a founding member of the UN, has served on the UNSC for four terms (1946–1947, 1956–1957, 1973–1974 and 1985–1986). In 1996, Australia failed in its bid for the 1997–98 term.

In March 2008, Australia’s then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd announced, in New York, the Government’s intention to seek a non-permanent seat on the UNSC for the 2013–14 term. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) moved quickly to establish a Security Council Campaign Taskforce and to provide more resources to Australia’s UN diplomatic mission in New York. In October 2010, Mr Rudd, then Foreign Minister, announced the appointment of Bob McMullan (for Africa) and Bill Fisher (for Francophone countries) as Special Envoys for Australia’s UNSC candidacy. A former Liberal Senator and Special Envoy for Eastern Europe, the Balkans and the Caucasus, Dr Russell Trood, also assisted the campaign. A brochure outlining the rationale behind Australia’s entry into the race (six and seven years later than Finland and Luxembourg respectively) is available here.

The Australian Institute for International Affairs (AIIA) has published a useful set of background documents on Australia and the UN, which contains key speeches and reflections by other countries that have served on the UNSC.

The vote

In order to win a non-permanent seat on the UNSC alongside the five permanent representatives which have the veto power (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States), each contender needed to secure at least two-thirds of votes cast by members present and voting in the General Assembly session (or a minimum of 129 votes if all 193 members are voting). A more detailed overview of the UNSC elections is available here.

In accordance with its established procedures, the UN General Assembly voted on 18 October 2012 in a secret ballot for the five available positions from the UN’s four geographical groups– Africa, Asia-Pacific, the Group of Latin American and Caribbean States (GRULAC) and the West European and Others (WEOG). Australia belongs to the WEOG group, where its rivals for the two available seats were Finland and Luxembourg, both European Union members. Luxembourg, which has never held a seat on the UNSC, won the other WEOG seat in a second round of voting, beating Finland. Rwanda (Africa) and Argentina (GRULAC) won unopposed in their respective groups. In the Asia-Pacific group, the competition was fiercer: Bhutan, Cambodia and the Republic of Korea competed for one seat, with the Republic of Korea winning the vote.

Commentary during the campaign

The Federal Opposition has hailed this ‘expensive victory’ for Australia. During the bid, however, the Coalition criticised the campaign. Its major criticism concerned the way money from foreign affairs and aid budgets was being allocated in the lead-up to the vote.

Senator Helen Kroger, speaking one day before the vote, said the Australian diplomatic campaign, which is estimated to have cost around A$25 million over five years, was often ‘patchy, unfocused’ and lacking a clear strategic direction, including from within DFAT as the coordinating agency.

The Leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, whilst endorsing the campaign in the final stage, was reported as saying that losing the bid would be ‘disastrous’ for Australia.

The Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop, criticised the Government for entering the race much later than its rivals and at a time when DFAT was severely under-funded. She said that ‘there can be benefits from gaining a temporary seat on the UNSC, although for these to be realised a nation must have a clear vision of why it is seeking membership and what it hopes to achieve’.

Former Minister for Foreign Affairs Alexander Downer predicted that Australia would most likely win.

In 2009, a survey conducted by the Lowy Institute for International Policy found that 71 per cent of surveyed Australians ‘partly’ or ‘strongly’ supported the UNSC campaign.

What next?

Prior to the vote, in her speech to the UN General Assembly on 26 September 2012, Australia’s Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, outlined some of Australia’s key priorities should we secure a non-permanent UNSC seat – the situation in Syria, the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), the Korean peninsula, Iran’s ongoing uranium enrichment activities, and the Middle East peace process. The Opposition has highlighted the need to identify clear priorities and said that it will be important for Australia ‘not to squander the opportunity at this political top table’. The Australian Greens have stated that Australia should 'use this opportunity to put addressing global warming, caring for people and controlling weapons at the top of the global security agenda'.

As noted, one of the criticisms raised during the campaign was that Australia lacked a clear plan of action should our bid succeed. Peter Jennings and Anthony Bergin from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) have suggested five areas of focus for Australia – strengthening the UN’s capacity to deal with failing states; keeping East Timor on the international agenda; building international support to help ban Improvised Explosive Devices; strengthening maritime security in the Indian Ocean and Pacific Rim; and strengthening global collaboration on cyber security.

Non-governmental organisations, such as United Nations Association of Australia (UNAA) and Oxfam, have also offered suggestions about the priorities Australia should pursue within the UNSC.

Questions have also been raised about how Australia would vote in the UNSC if the position of our key ally, the United States, was at odds with that our biggest trade partner, China.

Another question is whether DFAT will be adequately resourced to pursue Australia’s diplomatic objectives in the UNSC. Dr Jeremy Farrall, a former Political Affairs Officer with the UNSC who now works at the Australian National University, said today that ‘Australia will need to expand its diplomatic resources both in New York and in Canberra in order to play a meaningful role on the Security Council’. The Age has recently reported that DFAT is likely to seek additional funding of up to A$34 million to support its new UNSC workload.

The Australian Financial Review reported today that Prime Minister Julia Gillard has listed the war in Afghanistan, nuclear proliferation and the fight against global terror as issues Australia will pursue after it takes up its seat on 1 January 2013.

Australia will also preside over UNSC for one month in 2014.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare policy elections welfare reform school education health financing Australian Defence Force emissions trading indigenous Australians women higher education private health insurance people trafficking illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 United Nations Employment Asia disability income management Middle East Medicare Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics sport health forced labour federal budget Afghanistan Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health United States aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Criminal Law Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling transport debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme pensions public service reform children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships corruption coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy welfare ASIO intelligence community terrorist groups Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court Higher Education Loan Program HECS military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia social media children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy science social inclusion human rights paternalism Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse terrorism World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats research and development new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional mental health alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran transparency ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly national security smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct integrity retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition standards conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office NATO work-life balance

Show all
Show less