Is $325 million enough for Tasmania's health care system?

Parliament house flag post

Is $325 million enough for Tasmania's health care system?

Posted 22/06/2012 by Rebecca de Boer

 Last week, after much speculation, the Federal Government announced that it would provide an extra $325 million over four years to Tasmania’s health care system. Previously the Tasmanian Government had announced cuts of up to $500 million over four years to the health care system, commencing from 1 July 2011. Many of these cuts were directed to elective surgery, reduced services and the closure of hospital beds. The most recent Tasmanian budget (May 2012) announced a reduction of the savings target by $120 million.

Of the $325 million, only $31.2 million will be directed towards elective surgery with the majority of funding to be spent on better care in the community, improved discharge care and training of medical specialists and more scholarships for nurses and allied health professionals.

Additional health funding for Tasmania (millions)
$31.2 Elective surgery (around 2600 operation with a focus on long wait patients such as orthopaedic and cataract surgery)
Around $22Establishment of walk-in clinics in Hobart and Launceston to provide basic care for minor illnesses and injuries at no cost
$48.7 (over 4 years)Improved care in the community to prevent and manage chronic disease through coordination of care with allied and preventive health services. This will be undertaken by the Tasmanian Medicare Local
$74.5 (over 4 years)Better care for patients when they are discharged and better palliative care in the community
$53.9 (over 4 years)Training for additional medical specialists and the provision of more scholarships for nurses and allied health professionals
$15.4 (over 4 years)To address gaps in mental health services
$36.8 (over 4 years)Roll out of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record in Tasmanian hospitals and the enabling of allied health, pathology and diagnostic imaging services to connect to eHealth
$42.0 (over 4 years)To support innovation in clinical services to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the delivery of care. This includes $1 million towards the establishment of the ‘Virtual Health Sciences Precinct’ which brings together hospitals, universities, research institutes and primary care providers

Whether this will have an impact on the Tasmanian health care system remains to be seen. Many of these initiatives are not readily measurable, for example, improved care in the community to manage chronic disease and better care for patients when they are discharged. Despite this, the Federal Government has required the Tasmanian Government to report monthly on how it spends any of the components of package it delivers, and what services it provides. The Federal Government also sought a guarantee that the Tasmanian Government will not undertake any more cuts to the health care system. A Commission on Tasmanian Government Delivery of Health Services will also be established to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the delivery of health care by the Tasmanian Government.

The problems facing the Tasmanian health care system are not new. Successive Council of Australian Government (COAG) Reform Council reports have documented the performance of the Tasmanian health care system. Tasmania had the second longest waiting times for elective surgery in 2010-11 (359 days), although this was shorter than the baseline year (369 days). Tasmania was the only jurisdiction not to improve the waiting times in emergency departments for triage category 2 for the period 2007-08 to 2010-11. Tasmania qualified only for 80% of the reward funding under the Elective Surgery Waiting List Reduction Plan as it focussed on low cost, high volume operations (such as cataracts) rather than tackling more complex procedures and reducing the number of people who had been waiting for a long time. Affordability of health care is also a key issue in Tasmania and the number of people who delayed or did not see a GP due to cost increased from around 5% in 2009-10 to 11% in 2010-11.

The election of the Rudd-Gillard government heralded additional Commonwealth funding for health care through an increase of one billion in 2007-08 and various National Partnership Agreements in Health. As part of the negotiations for national health reform, an additional $16.4 billion (across all State and Territories over five years) was secured to account for the growth in public hospital expenditure. The extra money came with accountability and transparency requirements but, as noted by the COAG Reform Council its 2010 report, the current reporting framework does not facilitate this.

Yet additional money, or increased reporting requirements, is not likely to solve the underlying problems of Tasmania’s health care system. As noted by Martyn Goddard, a consumer health advocate in Tasmania, expenditure by the Tasmanian Government on public hospitals rose year on year by an average of 11% from 2002-01 to 2009-10. Other government expenditure rose on average by around 5.7% and total government revenue only increased by 6.1%.

Hospital costs in Tasmania are the highest in the country (see Table 3.15 of Australia’s Hospital Statistics 2010-11), although there are limitations to this data. These costs may be explained by longer stays in hospital (compared to the Australian average), discharge planning processes and organisational culture. On average, Tasmanians have poorer health and health outcomes than most Australians and this may also contribute to increased hospital costs.

What then is the solution? Martyn Goddard has proposed a federal takeover of the Tasmanian health care system with day to day administration of the system at the local level. This has been dismissed by Minister Plibersek. The Tasmanian Greens have proposed a trial of a ‘single funder’ model but it not clear who the single funder will be. The Federal Parliament has recently passed a Bill which will enable greater transparency of public hospital funding but this does not address the underlying structural issues of the Tasmanian health care system or the challenges associated with the Federation. Reform of Commonwealth-State relations is unlikely to ‘fix’ all the problems of the health care system but clarification of the roles and responsibilities is likely to improve accountability. For Tasmania, and the thousands of patients waiting for elective surgery, the money and (potential) improvements to the health care system can’t come quick enough.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs people trafficking Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA health financing emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway

Show all
Show less
Back to top