Appliance energy ratings get the standard treatment

Parliament house flag post

Appliance energy ratings get the standard treatment

Posted 29/06/2012 by Anita Talberg

Parliamentary debates on the Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards (GEMS) Bill have been deferred. The Bill was originally scheduled for discussion on Thursday 28 June, with the portfolio Shadow Minister to outline the Coalition’s position. Although the scheme started out as a Labor election promise in 2007, it evolved into a commitment under COAG’s National Strategy on Energy Efficiency to ‘establish national legislation for Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) and labelling, and over time move to add Greenhouse and Energy Minimum Standards (GEMS)’. This Bill implements that COAG commitment.

Historically, the energy efficiency of appliances has been managed at the state level, primarily through the Equipment Energy Efficiency Program. However, inconsistencies between state laws arose. In response, the Australian Government is harmonising the seven state and territory legislative frameworks, replacing them with one national scheme. This is in line with commitments to the UNFCCC, which requires implementation of national programs that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The Australian Government’s commitment is to reduce national greenhouse gas emissions by at least 5% on 2000 levels by 2020 and 80% by 2050. ABARES has estimated that 55% of Australia’s emissions reduction target to 2050 could be met through energy efficiency improvements—a logical choice, but they can be difficult to implement. Some recent attempts at household energy efficiency schemes (Home Insulation Plan, Green Loans Program and proposed Green Start program) have been marred by design and implementation problems.

The GEMS scheme
The GEMS Bill is a framework Bill. It establishes a GEMS Regulator and provides for the appointment of GEMS Inspectors. It requires the Minister to make determinations covering product classes and then for models to be registered under those determinations. These determinations detail standards, test methods, labelling requirements and any other requirements.

Before making a GEMS determination, the Minister must obtain consent from at least two-thirds (i.e. five) of the participating jurisdictions (which currently includes all states and territories). The determination then comes into force 12 months later, unless otherwise specified. If an item is manufactured or imported before a GEMS determination, that item may be sold or supplied indefinitely. However, to avoid suppliers stockpiling obsolete products, the GEMS determination may include a limited grandfathering period beyond which any supply of the relevant item is banned. To manage stockpiling issues and the progress of appliance energy efficiency, the Bill requires companies to provide data on the numbers of imported, exported and manufactured items.

Potential issues
Industry and energy businesses are generally supportive of the intent of the Bill because it simplifies the present situation. Nonetheless there are concerns, such as duplication and confusion from added layers of bureaucracy, required notice periods, costs, and disclosure of sensitive information.

Duplication and confusion
In response to the Draft Bill, many industry groups expressed discontent that the proposed scheme may introduce duplication and create confusion if not properly aligned with existing codes and standards. In particular, there was apprehension that the Minister may be able to override Standards Australia, making a decision without transparency which could exclude industry and the community.

In its response, the Government identified two separate issues: the first relating to transparency, and the second concerning the ability to bypass Standards Australia. The Government addressed transparency by reminding stakeholders that determinations would be by disallowable instruments and that they would be made following a public consultation process. On the second issue, the Government explained that the Minister would have the ability to ‘call up’ existing Standards Australia documents, granting them legal status.

Another concern is the risk of inconsistency between states and territories, despite the fact that the main purpose of the proposed scheme is to rectify this. The Bill explicitly states that state and territory laws may operate concurrently with GEMS, as long as they impose more stringent requirements. There are precedents for states taking unilateral action:

In 2009 the Queensland Government unilaterally adopted higher MEPS levels for some classes of air conditioner, to apply in that state only... In December 2009 the South Australian Government also gazetted requirements for air conditioners to be sold in SA from 1 January 2010, that differ from the nationally agreed program.

Some industry groups have called for determinations to require unanimous agreement.

The potential for the proposed scheme to increase operational costs has also been raised. The Government has indicated that initial fees for registration will range from $250 to $650 and will be reviewed every three years.

Many industry groups have raised concerns over the Bill’s requirement for businesses to provide Government with sales data that could be considered commercially sensitive. The Bill empowers the GEMS Regulator to request such information but also prescribes offences arising from the mishandling of such information. Industry is also concerned that the provision of data will add unreasonable costs.

Notice periods
Since the Draft version, this Bill increases from three to 12 months the notice period for a new GEMS determination to take effect. Some companies say the twelve-month notice period is still not sufficient.

Expanding the scheme
The Explanatory Memorandum notes that the Bill will ‘allow the expansion of energy efficiency regulation in the future to cover a wider range of products’. It could regulate equipment that uses energy other than electricity, such as diesel or petrol generators. Eventually it could also cover products that do not directly use energy but affect energy use, such as windows and insulation. How a window affects energy use is, of course, related not just to the window but to its installation and the overall design of the building. This is why such products have historically been assessed and/or regulated through building codes and holistic rating systems. Putting these matters into GEMS will require further careful planning.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top