A labour market for the resources sector – what are Enterprise Migration Agreements?

Parliament house flag post

A labour market for the resources sector – what are Enterprise Migration Agreements?

Posted 4/06/2012 by Harriet Spinks

The use of temporary overseas workers to fill skills gaps in the Australian labour market has been commonplace over the last two decades. The subclass 457 visa was introduced by the Howard Government in 1996 specifically in order to meet the needs of employers looking for timely and flexible access to labour where it could not be found locally. There were 90 400 subclass 457 primary visa holders in Australia at 30 April 2012.

The Immigration Minister’s recent announcement that an Enterprise Migration Agreement (EMA), facilitating the recruitment of temporary overseas workers, had been granted to the Roy Hill project in the Pilbara appears to have taken many observers by surprise. It shouldn’t have.

Enterprise Migration Agreements were announced in May 2011, as one component of the Government’s response to the recommendations made by the National Resources Sector Employment Taskforce in its 2010 report on the employment needs of the resources sector. EMAs are designed to meet the needs of the resource sector in accessing temporary overseas workers to work on large-scale projects (with capital expenditure of more than $2 billion), where Australian labour cannot be found. The policy was developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders in the resource sector, including government agencies (federal and state), business peak bodies, unions and major employers.

EMAs only allow for the hiring of temporary overseas workers, on subclass 457 visas, not permanent overseas workers. Employers must meet all the sponsorship obligations associated with hiring 457 workers, including paying Australian market salary rates. Workers will be subject to the protections contained in the Migration Legislation Amendment (Worker Protection Act) 2008.

Projects also need to demonstrate ongoing local recruitment efforts before they will be granted an EMA, in order to ensure that overseas workers are being used only to supplement gaps in the local labour market, rather than as an alternative to Australian workers.

How do EMAs work?

EMAs essentially extend existing Labour Agreement arrangements to an entire project. A Labour Agreement is an agreement between the Commonwealth and a single employer allowing for the recruitment of an agreed number of overseas workers, either temporary or permanent, or both. EMAs allow for the owner of an eligible resource project to negotiate an agreement for the entire project, meaning that individual employers and sub-contractors working on the project do not need to negotiate individual agreements for that project.

The EMA sets out the terms of employment for workers on the project, including occupations, qualifications, English language skills, wages and conditions of the foreign workers. It also sets out the training commitments which must be met by the project. Sub-contractors then sign onto Labour Agreements under the terms agreed to in the EMA, ensuring that the company directly employing the overseas worker maintains the sponsorship obligations that go along with hiring foreign labour.

While the standard 457 visa program is available only to skilled workers in certain occupations, projects which are granted an EMA may also recruit semi-skilled workers. In order to do so however, they need to provide evidence showing that they are unable to find Australian workers to fill these jobs. The number of semi-skilled overseas workers that may be recruited for the project is subject to a cap, which is set during negotiation of the EMA. The recruitment of skilled overseas workers, who would otherwise be eligible for the standard 457 visa program, is not subject to a cap.

In order to be approved for an EMA the project must develop a training plan outlining how the project will develop skills amongst Australian workers in order to meet the future labour needs of the resource sector. Sub-contracting employers on the project will also need to meet one of the standard training benchmarks under the 457 visa program—either contributing two per cent of payroll to a relevant industry training fund or spending one per cent of payroll on training for their Australian employees.

Further information on EMAs can be found in this fact sheet produced by the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.

The Roy Hill Project

The $9.5 billion Roy Hill iron ore project in the Pilbara is the first project to be granted an EMA. The precise terms of the agreement have not been released, but the Immigration Minister has stated that it will allow up to 1715 overseas workers to be sponsored for work on the project over the course of the initial three year construction phase, in occupations including electricians, mechanical fitters, scaffolders, and boilermakers. This overseas work force will supplement an Australian work force expected to be in excess of 6700.

Under the agreement, Roy Hill will provide up to 2000 training places for Australians, including Indigenous Australians. The Government expects the project to invest more than $20 million in training Australian workers. The Minister has also stated that ‘the agreement has specific clauses that will require both Roy Hill and its contractors to continue to prioritise the recruitment of Australians throughout the life of the project.’ However, as the agreement has not been publicly released, very little detail is known about how Roy Hill intends to prioritise Australian workers, or how the Government will monitor this. The Government has also announced the creation of a Jobs Board to ensure local workers are hired first, but again, little detail is known about how this will operate.

The EMA with Roy Hill has been welcomed by business and industry groups, who believe that access to foreign workers is essential for ensuring the viability of large-scale resource projects. However the agreement has been criticised by unions, the Australian Greens, and even some members of the ALP, who are concerned that foreign workers will be used at the expense of Australian workers, and that the Government’s priority should be to protect local jobs. The Government is confident that the terms under which EMAs are negotiated do just that, and that sufficient safeguards are in place to ensure overseas workers will be used only where Australian workers cannot be found. The reality is that the use of temporary foreign labour to fill skills shortages has been a fact in Australia for many years, and with grants of 457 visas increasing and more EMAs in the pipeline it is likely to continue to be so for many years to come.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment Sport illicit drugs people trafficking taxation Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force higher education welfare policy United Nations Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget health financing gambling school education forced labour aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA emissions trading Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations people smuggling dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme Australian Crime Commission slavery Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Afghanistan Fair Work Act child protection debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure poker machines ALP New Zealand Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth paid parental leave Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers Special Rapporteur leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy violence against women domestic violence mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing by-election European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas family assistance planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing money laundering Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship human rights citizenship Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions Norway hospitals

Show all
Show less
Back to top