The gift that stops giving? Government launches new inquiry into gift cards

Parliament house flag post

The gift that stops giving? Government launches new inquiry into gift cards

Posted 27/01/2012 by Leah Ferris


Image source: author
While not always considered the most exciting presents to unwrap, these small, easy-to-purchase items were rated among the top Christmas presents preferred by Australians last year. Yet for some recipients gift cards have proved less useful than the traditional pair of socks, leading to a review as to whether the best things really do come in small packages.

The Commonwealth Consumer Affairs Advisory Council (CCAAC) has recently released its paper “Gift Cards in the Australian Market”. It comes as a response to concerns raised by Paul Lucas MP who, along with consumer groups such as Choice, has called for a nationwide scheme to regulate the use of gift cards. The paper looks at the laws that currently apply to the gift card industry and whether these laws sufficiently protect both gift card users and purchasers.

The paper also discusses a number of difficulties encountered by gift card users. These include:
  • Expiry dates: the majority of gift cards have a time limit within which they must be used. This is normally between 12 and 24 months. Bunning’s, Toys “R” Us and EB Games are some of the few companies that offer a card with no expiry date. Special care must be taken when noting the expiry date, as some cards only state when the card was issued and then set out the length of the time period within the terms and conditions.
  • Change not provided: some retailers will not give cash for the amount remaining on the card, though you may have the option of using the card again. If the remaining value is not redeemed by the time the card expires, the retailer will pocket the change.
  • Where the retailer becomes insolvent: when this occurs, gift card holders will become unsecured creditors and must wait until the company is wound up and priority payments made, before receiving anything. In the case of Borders and Angus & Robertson, gift card holders were offered the option of redeeming their card provided they spent twice the value of the card.

In Australia, the same laws that apply to all goods and services also apply to gift cards. These include the laws relating to consumer rights (including misleading and deceptive conduct, fraud, unfair contract terms and unconscionable conduct) set out in the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act). The ACL is the new national framework for consumer protection. It applies to gift cards that can only be used at a single retailer (such as Dymocks). Gift cards that can be used at multiple retailers (such as Westfield Shopping Centre) are governed by the ASIC Act. In addition, these cards are exempted from certain disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). For example, if they have an expiry date the exemption will only apply if the date is set out clearly on the card. If the retailer becomes insolvent, the rights of a gift card holder as an unsecured creditor are also covered by this Act. This means that there are already laws in place to protect people who purchase gift cards—but are they sufficient? And do they actually extend to the person who receives the gift card?

In her article, ‘Gift Vouchers and Expiry Dates: When the Gift Stops Giving’, Nicky Jones argues that it is unfair to gift card holders that there are currently no express rules in Australia addressing expiry dates on gift vouchers, and that those who wish to pursue legal action may be required to do so through the gift card purchaser. How does a much loved niece or nephew explain to an aging aunt that they failed to use the gift card which was their last birthday present and now want her to take action against the person she purchased it from?

While the CCAAC paper addresses these problems, it also acknowledges the dilemmas faced by retailers in ensuring that those who actually use the gift cards are made aware of the relevant terms and conditions. This is further complicated where the retailer who sells the gift card is not the same as the retailer to whom the gift card applies. How, for example, does Australia Post which sells gift cards for retailers such as Sportsgirl make the buyer aware that there might be important conditions which apply to the use of the gift card? And should it have to? Another issue the CCAAC paper looks at is the difficulty experienced by retailers when accounting for cards with no expiry date, as retailers have no way of predicting how many people will actually use their cards, or which financial period they will use them in.

In looking at what changes could be made to the current laws, thought must be given to what the situation is in other countries. Both the United States and certain Canadian provinces have enacted laws specifically targeted at the gift card industry. These new laws have been aimed at restricting or banning service fees and expiry dates, allowing people to receive cash back on balances below a certain amount and ensuring that terms and conditions are adequately disclosed. A notable change is that all gift cards sold in the US must have a minimum duration of 5 years from the date funds are loaded before they can expire. Whether or not these laws aimed specifically at the gift card industry could be appropriately introduced into Australia’s broad consumer protection framework requires some consideration.

With Australians spending over $1.5 billion on gift cards each year, the CCAAC is looking closely at whether any changes need to be made. Anyone who would like to contribute to the discussion on this issue is certainly encouraged to do so by 5:00pm on Friday, 2 March 2012 through the official website.

Comments

  • 21/01/2014 3:33 PM
    Leah Ferris said:

    A gift card is a useful present only if the person who receives it can take it to the relevant store and use it to purchase items that they really want. The blog sets out the problems some people have had in doing just that. For example, a store might argue that the gift card is ‘out of date’ and refuse to let the gift card holder use it. In that case, you might say that the card wasn’t a useful present at all—it’s just a piece of plastic—and maybe socks would have been a better present after all.

  • 21/01/2014 3:33 PM
    TAFE said:

    How come the cards aren't useful?


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare reform school education welfare policy health financing elections Australian Defence Force emissions trading women higher education private health insurance people trafficking Indigenous Australians illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 United Nations Employment Asia Middle East Medicare Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics sport health forced labour federal budget Afghanistan Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics income management dental health United States aid disability child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling transport debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme public service reform law enforcement children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Australian Federal Police criminal law Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave pensions same sex relationships corruption coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy terrorist groups Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court Higher Education Loan Program HECS military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia social media children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy science social inclusion human rights paternalism terrorism World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats research and development new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC ASIO intelligence community carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional mental health alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran transparency ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct integrity retirement Parliament House Australian Secret Intelligence Service welfare standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession sexual abuse US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition standards conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office NATO work-life balance

Show all
Show less