Local government: the road to Constitutional recognition

Parliament house flag post

Local government: the road to Constitutional recognition

Posted 11/01/2012 by Sophia Fernandes

As part of the agreements to form government in September 2010, the ALP committed to advancing constitutional recognition of local government, including holding a referendum during the 43rd Parliament or at the next election.


An independent Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government was appointed in April 2011 by the federal government. Headed by NSW Chief Justice the Hon. James Spigelman AC QC, the panel circulated a discussion paper and conducted community consultation releasing their final report on 22 December 2011. This post will discuss findings and conclusions from the panel's final report.

The panel considered four types of recognition; symbolic recognition, democratic recognition, financial recognition and recognition through federal cooperation. The panel noted that both symbolic recognition (via an insertion of a preamble to the Constitution) and recognition through federal cooperation gave rise to issues that extended beyond local government and therefore were beyond its scope.


The panel commissioned Newspoll to conduct polling research on public sentiment including the level and nature of support for constitutional recognition of local government (available at Appendix C). The research revealed strong in-principle support for recognition but when faced with challenges to the proposal, public support decreased significantly. The report pointed out that while polling showed high initial support, the reality when faced with a referendum question could be far different.

In context, out of the forty-four referenda put to the Australian people, only eight have passed. The expert panel report acknowledges the general historical reluctance of Australians to change the Constitution. The panel took this into consideration in recommending support for a referendum in 2013 on financial recognition, placing two conditions on the proposal:

...first, that the Commonwealth negotiate with the States to achieve their support for the financial recognition option; and second, that the Commonwealth adopt steps suggested by ALGA necessary to achieve informed and positive public engagement with the issue, as set out in the section of this report on the concerns about a failed referendum. (p.2)

In submissions made to the panel, out of the four proposed forms of recognition, financial recognition received the most support both at federal and state levels, although conditional upon the wording of any referendum question. Currently, the federal government does provide direct funding to local government for example through the National Building Roads to Recovery program and through the Regional Development Australia Fund. The constitutional validity of funding is often debated, citing the High Court decision in Pape vs Commissioner of Taxation (2009). The panel notes that in submissions, the argument of constitutional validity is most commonly made in support of recognition as local governments assert that they depend on Commonwealth funding to ensure financial stability. While the ALP is known for long-standing support of constitutional recognition of local government, stated Coalition policy is to support financial recognition with both the Opposition leader and Leader of the Nationals expressing in-principle support. At a State level, most governments expressed in their submissions that they would reserve judgement until release of the wording of the referendum, some stating in-principle support while others (Vic, WA) were against any of the proposals and questioned whether maintaining the status quo would adversely affect current Commonwealth-local government funding arrangements. Overall the panel points out:

...there is a very real doubt about the constitutional validity of direct grant programs that do not fall under a head of Commonwealth legislative power. (p.4)
The report does not provide a concrete definition of the manner in which financial recognition would be included in the Constitution. Broadly, financial recognition would remove doubts as to the validity of the Commonwealth providing direct funds to local government.

Although the report points out that financial recognition is the most viable type of change to the Constitution, as long as it meets the conditions as discussed above, it does caution about the inclusion of the term 'local government' in the Constitution and the potential effect this might have as a 'constitutional expression'. The manner in which the term is included in the Constitution could mean that 'local government' would be subject to interpretation by the High Court and would create the possibility of the High Court determining the legal definition of local government. As a starting point for the consideration of the wording of the referendum, the report summarises the manner in which the term 'local government' is currently characterised in Commonwealth, State and Territory legislation (Appendix E).

Two previous referenda on the issue, one in 1974 and one in 1988 had previously failed largely due to lack of bi-partisan support for constitutional recognition, a lack of urgency to reform the system, the manner in which the question was worded, and multiple questions being put to Australians that drew attention away from the issue. The Parliamentary Library publication, Local government and the Commonwealth: an evolving relationship, provides a historical overview of the development of local governments and details on the two previous referenda.

The Minister for Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government
Minister for the Arts, the Hon. Simon Crean announced that the government is expected to respond to the report in early 2012.

The Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) welcomed the report and recommendation for financial recognition of local government in the Constitution. ALGA announced that they would respond to the report in early 2012.

Comments

  • 21/01/2014 3:35 PM
    Martin Butterfield said:

    It would be useful if the exact meaning of "financial recognition" was clearly spelt out in this post. From reading the summary of the report it appears to mean a provision in the Constitution recognising the right of the Commonwealth to provide funds directly to Local Governments. However that isn't clear in the Summary nor in this post.

  • 21/01/2014 3:35 PM
    Parliamentary Library said:

    Thank you for your comment. We have amended the post to clarify this point.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]




Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

asylum refugees immigration climate change Parliament elections Australian foreign policy social security health financing women Australian Defence Force taxation welfare policy welfare reform sport Medicare employment illicit drugs gambling Australian Bureau of Statistics higher education disability statistics private health insurance Middle East Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency health reform emissions trading industrial relations united states Carbon Pricing Mechanism United Nations school education steroids WADA federal budget 43rd Parliament politics labour force Australian Federal Police transport indigenous Australians aid detention criminal law child protection ASADA Afghanistan governance international relations poker machines law enforcement people trafficking Fair Work Act Australian Public Service pharmaceutical benefits scheme International Women's Day Australian Crime Commission parliamentary procedure National Disability Insurance Scheme children's health food OECD debt defence capability federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission aged care Asia Australia in the Asian Century environment Senate income management pensions planning skilled migration Papua New Guinea multiculturalism people smuggling social media doping HECS Higher Education Loan Program paid parental leave health High Court corruption federal state relations dental health New Zealand terrorist groups ALP election results constitution UK Parliament public service reform forced labour aviation coal seam gas crime customs ADRV Census Newstart Parenting Payment employee employer Federal Court foreign debt gross debt net debt European Union domestic violence firearms Constitutional reform food labelling Australian economy carbon tax banking political parties public policy terrorism welfare Australian Security Intelligence Organisation intelligence community Drugs research and development voting mental health health system human rights Northern Territory Emergency Response science Electoral reform regional unemployment violence against women accountability China military history Indigenous Indonesia Pacific Islands speaker health risks superannuation middle class welfare welfare systems question time animal health Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry trade unions integrity same sex relationships foreign bribery Australian Secret Intelligence Service export liquefied natural gas local government referendum children mining forestry Tasmania financial sector Canada United Nations Security Council climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership expertise Senators and Members family assistance by-election US economy housing affordability ASIO carbon markets new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC reserved seats regulation Parliamentary remuneration Population Hung Parliament federal budget 2011-12 paternalism public health slavery Trafficking in Persons Report homelessness school chaplains ministries water federal election 2010 Medicare Locals primary care regional students Youth Allowance entitlements salary sea farers productivity Special Rapporteur transparency money laundering early childhood education national security sexual abuse bulk billing disability employment World Trade Organization Australia renewable energy US politics terrorist financing language education royal commission Italy roads international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies standard of proof arts World Health Organisation disciplinary tribunals railways infant mortality honorary citizen suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports contracts workplace policies peace keeping disorderly conduct same-sex marriage Parliament House retirement Rent Assistance constitutional recognition of local government anti-dumping national heritage NHMRC nutrition GDP world heritage submarines Somalia United Kingdom defence budget First speech election timetable sitting days prime ministers standing orders public housing cancer gene patents genetic testing universities Ireland public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission vocational education and training limitation period Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping leave loading political engagement Korean peninsula counselling pests suicide social policy alcohol computer games plebiscites therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration federalism federation preselection Iran sanctions baby bonus early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin citizen engagement policymaking biosecurity hendra environmental law COAG Ministerial Councils nuclear Work Choices republic hospitals qantas ANZUS Norway President Barack Obama Presidential visits advertising electricity energy maritime floods ADHD stimulant medication ABS Trade Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings 44th Parliament 2015 e-voting internet voting nsw state elections Indigenous health procurement child care funding refugees immigration asylum ACT Assembly Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors social services EU fishing asylum refugees immigration political finance donations Antarctica Diplomacy Disability Support Pension by-elections state and territories China soft power education Fiji India fuel Scottish referendum Members of Parliament Middle East; national security; terrorism Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy innovation Bills NATO workers anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform standards copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry Governor-General Animal law; food health policy employment law bullying asylum seekers Economics efficiency foreign aid human rights; Racial Discrimination Act smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Work Health and Safety Asia; Japan; international relations youth Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine political financing Australia Greens Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling Stronger futures rural and regional political parties preselection presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act Australian Greens obesity competition policy US presidential election evidence law sacrament of confession international days codes of conduct consumer laws

Show all
Show less
Back to top