'Brave new world'? The Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling

Parliament house flag post

'Brave new world'? The Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling

Posted 23/02/2012 by Marilyn Harrington


Image source: Australian Government
The report of the Review of Funding for Schooling (the Gonski Review) is a blueprint for a major overhaul of federal and state funding for school education. It has proposed a fundamental realignment of the historic funding roles of the Australian and state and territory governments that would see both levels of government provide more balanced funding to government and non-government schools. Significantly, the Gonski Review believes that its proposals will meet the Australian Government’s commitment that ‘no school would lose a dollar per student’.
Through its initial response, the Australian Government has set itself an ambitious agenda for change, with the Prime Minister aiming to introduce legislation for a new school funding system before the end of the year.
The Gonski Review’s key recommendations include:
  • differential SRS per student funding for non-government schools on the basis of their estimated capacity to generate private income
  • additional funding for disadvantaged students in all schools
  • the establishment of a National Schools Resourcing Body and
  • expanded Australian Government capital funding and School Planning Authorities to oversight the condition of school infrastructure and coordinate its development.

The Schooling Resource Standard (SRS)
  • The level of recurrent funding for school students will be determined by the SRS. It includes a per student amount (with different amounts for primary and secondary school students) and loadings for student and school-based sources of disadvantage (socioeconomic background, disability, English language proficiency, Indigeneity, and school size and location).
  • The per student SRS amounts (estimates are $8000 per primary school student and $10 500 per secondary school student using 2009 figures) will be based on the resources used by high-achieving schools (reference schools), as identified by their performance in the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), and indexed annually.
  • Government school students will receive the full amount of the per student SRS.
  • The amount for non-government schools will be adjusted according to the anticipated level of a school’s private contribution, ranging from 10 per cent to about 75 per cent to 80 per cent of the
    SRS. Some non-government schools, such as special schools and those that do not have the capacity to charge fees, would receive the full SRS per student amount.
  • The minimum public funding that non-government schools would receive would be 20 to 25 per cent of the SRS. This amount equates to the combined total per student funding that these schools receive from all governments. The Gonski Review considers this amount would ensure the commitment that no school would lose a dollar in per student funding.The loadings for disadvantage would apply equally to all eligible students regardless of their school.
  • The loadings for disadvantage would apply equally to all eligible students regardless of their school.

The Gonski Review estimates that the new school funding model will require $5 billion (2009 prices) in additional funding, about 75 per cent of which will be provided to government schools. Based on the current share of total government funding, state and territory governments would incur about 70 per cent of the additional cost.

As the report states, there is much critical detail to be verified and resolved, and there are many challenges ahead, including:
  • verification of the methodology for calculating the per student SRS amounts. There is concern that the use of NAPLAN data is too narrow a measure of school achievement and others regard the 80 per cent achievement level as too low. The report notes that updated estimates will be needed by mid 2012 to facilitate negotiations and suggests that eventually a broader range of outcome measures be developed 
  • the report has not provided estimates, or a methodology, for the loadings for disadvantage. As with the SRS amounts, the report notes these estimates need to be developed by mid-2012. A key challenge here is to develop a nationally consistent definition of a student with a disability—an issue which has been on the national education agenda for many years
  • the $5 billion additional funding (about $5.4 billion in current prices), is a major challenge in the current budget environment, which both the report and the Government’s response acknowledge. 
  • the report identifies the need for a lengthy transition process but has not provided any detail, apart from stating some general principles and that it will be dependent on what is finally decided for the new funding system and
  • the successful and timely implementation of a new funding system is dependent on the support of state and territory governments who are being asked to make fundamental changes to school funding and to significantly increase their contribution.
The work of the Gonski Review has been widely praised but with so many different stakeholders the responses to its proposals are inevitably mixed. State education ministers have concerns about issues of states’ rights, funding commitments, and the lack of any definite response to the Gonski recommendations by the Australian Government. The Australian Greens and the Australian Education Union (AEU) consider the additional funding for government schools as long overdue and are urging the Government to quickly establish an implementation timeline. The AEU has also expressed disappointment that the Government has not responded more positively to the capital grants proposals. The Independent Schools Council of Australia (ISCA) will remain uncertain about the future level of non-government schools funding until the final outcome is known. However, it has welcomed the funding for disadvantaged students.
The Coalition’s Shadow Minister for Education, Christopher Pyne, has welcomed the Gonski report but remains concerned that non-government schools may lose funding and has stated his preference for the existing SES system for funding non-government schools. He is concerned about school fee increases, disincentives for private investment, and the implications for parental choice. The Shadow Minister’s belief that the Government will introduce means testing of non-government school parents has been refuted by the National Catholic Education Commission Chairperson.
The Gonski Review found that the current funding arrangements for schooling are ‘unnecessarily complex’. However, there are some who believe the reform proposals present a more complex model that will add to the administrative burden of school systems. The Independent Schools Council of Australia has also warned against establishing an ‘overly bureaucratic process’ that may be a ‘regulatory burden’ for schools.
Given the complexity of the proposals and with much detail still to be worked through, it is understandable that there are many reservations about the Gonski report. One commentator has also observed the way ahead is likely to be difficult, given the Government has chosen to establish a number of working groups through the Council of Australian Governments. Nevertheless, stakeholders have generally expressed a willingness to work towards a new school funding system.
Finally, as the Gonski report notes, the process of school reform and improving student outcomes involves more than funding. Echoing the findings of a recent Grattan Institute report on student achievement in East Asian countries, the Business Council of Australia has reminded us that additional resources, without addressing the ‘key drivers of educational performance’ (chiefly teacher quality) will not improve educational outcomes for all.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare policy elections welfare reform school education Australian Defence Force health financing higher education emissions trading indigenous Australians women private health insurance people trafficking Employment illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics United Nations Asia Afghanistan disability income management Middle East Medicare sport health forced labour United States federal budget Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health criminal law transport aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme corruption pensions public service reform children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy terrorism transparency research and development Mental health welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion human rights paternalism integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly national security smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top