Introducing the Doha Climate Gateway

Parliament house flag post

Introducing the Doha Climate Gateway

Posted 11/12/2012 by Anita Talberg




Image source: COP18 website
On 8 December 2012—a day later than scheduled—the 18th Conference of the Parties (COP18) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) concluded. With it, ended the Bali Roadmap (see previous FlagPost) and began the new era of climate change negotiations: that of the grandly-named Doha Climate Gateway. This FlagPost describes what the Gateway opens onto, and outlines some other items that were discussed (although possibly not resolved) at Doha.
Remembering the science
On 10 December 2012, the academic journal Nature Climate Change published research confirming that early predictions of possible temperature increases have proved accurate. The new research reinforces 2007 modelling that suggested that the world is most likely heading for a temperature increase of at least 4 degrees by the end of the century.

Just two days before Nature Climate Change published this article, the President of COP18 noted (with grave concern) that current emissions reduction pledges are not sufficient to keep global average temperature increases to within agreed limits. A new overarching and more ambitious agreement is needed.
Noting with grave concern the significant gap between the aggregate effect of Parties’ mitigation pledges in terms of global annual emissions of greenhouse gases by 2020 and aggregate emission pathways consistent with having a likely chance of holding the increase in global average temperature below 2 °C or 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels,
Recognizing that fulfilling the ultimate objective of the Convention will require strengthening of the multilateral, rules-based regime under the Convention,
A new agreement from 2020
With the Kyoto Protocol’s extension now filling the gap from 2013 to 2020, negotiators will focus more heavily on a new agreement to begin in eight years. Countries intend to develop and adopt a fully inclusive and legally-binding global climate change agreement in December 2015, to come into force in 2020. This new agreement, unlike the Kyoto Protocol, will not rely solely on commitments from developed countries; poorer countries will now be part of the solution. Beyond this, not much progress has been made. All the big decisions have all been pushed out to 2013 and later, for example:
  • Determining country emission reduction targets: Governments have agreed that workshops on increasing the extent of countries’ emissions pledges (raising their ambitions) will be convened in 2013. In aid of this, countries are to submit information, ideas and proposals to the UNFCCC Secretariat by 1 March 2013. A number of these types of suggestions have already been canvassed (here, here and here).
  • The shape and key points of a draft agreement: Parties have agreed that these need to be ready by end 2014 to allow a negotiating text to be drafted by May 2015. Political momentum for this is to be promoted by a gathering of world leaders in 2014 (as announced by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon).
What else was achieved at Doha?
Financing was heavily discussed at Doha, but no real progress was made. The Green Climate Fund, first announced in Copenhagen in 2009 as a means of transferring funds from richer to poorer nations for climate change action and adaptation, was finally given a home. It is to be based in South Korea and will begin its work in 2013.

In 2009, developed countries also committed to “fast-start” and “long-term” finance to assist developing countries in the area of climate change. The “fast-start” component was to consist of
 …new and additional resources, including forestry and investments, approaching USD 30 billion for the period 2010 - 2012 and with balanced allocation between mitigation and adaptation.
The “long-term” component is supposed to provide US$100 billion by 2020. At Doha, developing countries called for scaled-up support over 2013-15 to ensure continuity of activities that are already being funded or are in the pipeline. However, only European countries have answered the call and have guaranteed US$6 billion over that period.

Approaching the funding issues from a different tack, developing countries introduced at Doha the idea of a new UN mechanism to provide funding to (a) insure poor nations against unpredictable and extreme impacts of climate change, such as greater frequency and severity of damaging weather, (b) compensate them for the slow effects, such as rising sea levels, and (c) promote new efforts to assess the risks of climate change. Developing nations would like to see this new mechanism high on the agenda in 2013.

What wasn’t achieved?
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (known as REDD+) is still important to many countries and is expected to form part of any future agreement, but progress on that front has been slow. The sticking point is mainly over how to verify emissions reductions. What cannot be measured and verified cannot be counted towards country targets. If it cannot be counted, it is still far off receiving adequate funding.

No decision was made on the Joint Implementation (JI) scheme. The JI, which exists under the Kyoto Protocol, allows developed nations to undertake emissions reduction projects in other developed countries and count the resulting carbon credits towards their own targets. Whether this scheme still exists for projects that start after 2012 is unclear.

Finally, negotiators had hoped to develop some form of new market mechanism for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but Doha proved a failure on that front as well. Various proposals had been put forward including the idea of providing carbon credits for emission cuts across entire sectors, or the formalisation of bilateral offset programs. However, the only outcome was a work programme and the intention to continue investigating options.

What will happen at COP19?
The next major forum for climate change negotiators will take place at the end of 2013 in Warsaw. This is the second time in just six years that nations have met in Poland to discuss climate change. The last meeting, in Poznan in 2008, was not highly regarded. It was merely a stepping stone to the COP15 in Copenhagen, which itself was all seen by many as a disappointment. It might be that this 2013 meeting will be just as subdued as Poznan was. The next event with the promise of any real progress may not be until 2014.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes spam, profanity and personal abuse, as well as comments that are factually incorrect or politically partisan. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

Refugees asylum climate change immigration Australian foreign policy parliament social security welfare reform school education welfare policy health financing elections Australian Defence Force emissions trading women higher education private health insurance people trafficking Indigenous Australians illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 United Nations Employment Asia Middle East Medicare Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics sport health forced labour federal budget Afghanistan Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics income management dental health United States aid disability child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency steroids World Anti-Doping Agency National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling transport debt taxation international relations constitution New Zealand food WADA Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme public service reform law enforcement children's health Aviation foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP ASADA Australian Federal Police criminal law Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave pensions same sex relationships corruption coal seam gas customs planning federal election 2013 Australian Electoral Commission doping OECD crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy terrorist groups Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court Higher Education Loan Program HECS military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing European Union Federal Court family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs UK Parliament welfare systems Indonesia social media children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy science social inclusion human rights paternalism terrorism World Trade Organization Australia public health China housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions domestic violence export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing election results by-election expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership voting Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats research and development new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC ASIO intelligence community carbon markets animal health middle class welfare ADRV Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics violence against women language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional mental health alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran transparency ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid disability employment Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct integrity retirement Parliament House Australian Secret Intelligence Service welfare standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP Tasmania world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession sexual abuse US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea fuel rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition standards conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office NATO work-life balance

Show all
Show less