Time for a change? Access to support and visas for trafficking victims

Parliament house flag post

Time for a change? Access to support and visas for trafficking victims

Posted 22/08/2012 by Cat Barker

The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Bill 2012 (Trafficking Bill) will update Australia’s offence regime to criminalise a broader range of exploitative conduct, including by introducing new offences of forced labour, forced marriage and harbouring a victim.  While these are welcome changes, there is a strong call from stakeholders to improve other aspects of Australia’s anti-people trafficking framework, including the support available to victims and their access to visas.

Articles 6 and 7 of the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women (Trafficking Protocol), ratified by Australia in 2005, outline parties’ obligations with respect to assistance and protection of victims of people trafficking and their legal status within receiving States.  Among those obligations, parties are required to:

  • protect the privacy and identity of victims
  • enable victims’ views and concerns to be presented and considered in the criminal justice process
  • consider implementing measures to support the physical, psychological and social recovery of victims (such as provision of appropriate housing, counselling and medical, psychological and material assistance)
  • provide measures that offer victims the possibility of obtaining compensation and
  • consider adopting measures to permit victims to remain in the receiving State temporarily or permanently, giving appropriate consideration to humanitarian and compassionate factors.
The Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs administers Australia’s Support for Victims of People Trafficking Program (support program).  As outlined in the Third Report of the Anti-People Trafficking Interdepartmental Committee, the support program is comprised of the following streams:
  • the Assessment Stream provides up to 45 days of intensive support to all suspected victims
  • the Extended Assessment Stream provides up to 45 days additional support for victims who are willing, but not able, to assist with an investigation or prosecution
  • the Justice Support Stream provides support to a victim assisting with an investigation or prosecution until the matter is finalised and
  • the Temporary Trial Support Stream provides intensive support to victims who return to Australia to give evidence for a prosecution.
Victims leaving the program also receive 20 days of transitional assistance.

The People Trafficking Visa Framework (visa framework), also outlined in that report, allows foreign nationals suspected to be victims of people trafficking to remain lawfully in Australia if they do not already hold a valid visa.  The framework comprises the Bridging F visa, the Criminal Justice Stay visa and the Witness Protection (Trafficking) (Permanent) visa.

A range of changesthat came into effect on 1 July 2009 made the support program and visa framework more accessible and responsive to victims’ needs.  However, in consultations leading up to its introduction, and in submissions to a current Senate inquiry into the Trafficking Bill, many stakeholders have argued that further amendments should be pursued.  The United Nations Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children (Special Rapporteur) also recommended a number of improvements in the May 2012 report on her mission to Australia.

The following diagram outlines the current visa framework and its interaction with the supportprogram:

The current visa framework and its interaction with the support program
 Source: JJ Larsen, L Renshaw, S Gray-Barry, H Andrevski and T Corsbie, Trafficking in persons monitoring report: January 2009-June 2011, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra 2012, p. 13.

Despite the changes made in 2009, it is clear that access to visas and to the support program still vary considerably depending on the ability and willingness of a suspected victim to assist an investigation or prosecution.  It is this aspect that has drawn the most criticism, with a range of stakeholders, as well as the Special Rapporteur and the Greensarguing that access to visas and to the support program should be determined solely on the basis of need, not on a victim’s willingness or ability to assist in the criminal justice process.  In addition, the Law Council of Australia has raised concerns that the focus on assisting the criminal justice process may discourage victims from seeking a visa, due to fears of reprisal against themselves or family members.  Beyond the requirement to give due consideration to humanitarian and compassionate factors, the Trafficking Protocol does not contain anything specific on the matter.  However, guidance issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights states that protection and assistance provided to victims ‘shall not be made conditional upon the capacity or willingness of the trafficked person to cooperate in legal proceedings.’

The Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) has suggested that providing equal access to visas and support to all victims is likely to not only improve outcomes for victims, but also increase their willingness to assist in the criminal justice process.  Victims may be more likely to trust law enforcement authorities if they are confident of their residence status.  Providing equal access could also assist prosecutions by helping to protect against attempts to discredit victims’ testimony on the basis that the victim is seeking residency.

The Special Rapporteur and the ALA have also argued that the initial support period of 45 days is not sufficient for victims to process what they have experienced and to form relationships of trust with immigration and law enforcement agencies.  Among eight formal recommendations made to the Australian Government by the Special Rapporteur on support for victims of trafficking was the extension of the initial period of support from 45 to 90 days.

While not directly relevant to the Trafficking Bill, victims’ access to visas and the support program are important aspects of Australia’s response to people trafficking, and suggestions for improvement deserve the attention of the Government and the Parliament.

The Special Rapporteur’s visitand reportare detailed in earlier FlagPosts.  A broad outline of the Trafficking Bill was also provided in an earlier FlagPost, and a Bills Digest will soon be available on the Parliamentary Library’s website.


  • 21/01/2014 2:34 PM
    Khali Vincent said:

    I agree that visas should be offered on humanitarian grounds. The process of being trafficked and kept in slavery would be extremely traumatic. Having confidence in residence status would help assist the recovery of people who have been trafficked as they would potentially feel much safer and secure, than living in uncertainty, or with the fear of being sent home where they may encounter social isolation or stigmatisation.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




refugees asylum immigration Australian foreign policy Parliament climate change elections women social security Indigenous Australians Australian Bureau of Statistics Employment taxation Sport illicit drugs Medicare welfare reform Australian Defence Force welfare policy Asia income management Middle East criminal law disability Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States higher education people trafficking school education aid statistics Australian Electoral Commission WADA United Nations federal budget health financing emissions trading gambling Australia in the Asian Century steroids detention Private health insurance OECD ASADA labour force transport Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Industrial Relations dental health National Disability Insurance Scheme forced labour Senate election results Papua New Guinea Australian Public Service International Women's Day corruption Fair Work Act child protection people smuggling debt federal election 2013 parliamentary procedure ALP New Zealand Australian Crime Commission Newstart Parenting Payment 43rd Parliament slavery by-election political parties Census constitution High Court skilled migration voting Federal Court terrorist groups Afghanistan Higher Education Loan Program HECS youth Aviation environment foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability customs poker machines doping health crime health risks multiculturalism aged care Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery sea farers leadership United Kingdom UK Parliament Electoral reform politics banking firearms public policy mental health China ADRV terrorism social media pensions welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation governance public service reform Carbon Pricing Mechanism carbon tax mining military history employer employee fishing paid parental leave European Union same sex relationships international relations coal seam gas planning United Nations Security Council Australian economy food vocational education and training Drugs Indonesia children codes of conduct terrorist financing election timetable citizenship Productivity asylum seekers early childhood education Canada Population Financial sector national security fuel violence against women domestic violence disability employment Tasmania integrity science research and development Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse federal state relations World Trade Organization Australia accountability housing affordability bulk billing water renewable energy children's health health policy Governor-General US economy export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation family assistance expertise Senators and Members climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry food labelling Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets health reform Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government local government consumer laws PISA royal commission US politics language education Leaders of the Opposition Parliamentary remuneration health system Australia Greens money laundering servitude Special Rapporteur Trafficking Protocol energy forced marriage rural and regional Northern Territory Emergency Response ministries social citizenship China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Defence High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding refugees immigration asylum procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories workers Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation standards NATO Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly public health smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine regional unemployment asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies trade unions same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders public housing prime ministers sitting days First speech defence budget submarines Somalia GDP forestry world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission regulation limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders animal health live exports welfare systems infant mortality middle class welfare honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Constitutional reform referendum Rent Assistance competition policy pharmaceutical benefits scheme obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days baby bonus DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant homelessness regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Youth Allowance Members suspension citizen engagement policymaking federal election 2010 workplace health and safety Trafficking in Persons Report marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament alcohol Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act entitlements political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing Hung Parliament political education social inclusion Social Inclusion Board maritime early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin Iran sanctions

Show all
Show less
Back to top