Time for a change? Access to support and visas for trafficking victims

Parliament house flag post

Time for a change? Access to support and visas for trafficking victims

Posted 22/08/2012 by Cat Barker

The Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Bill 2012 (Trafficking Bill) will update Australia’s offence regime to criminalise a broader range of exploitative conduct, including by introducing new offences of forced labour, forced marriage and harbouring a victim.  While these are welcome changes, there is a strong call from stakeholders to improve other aspects of Australia’s anti-people trafficking framework, including the support available to victims and their access to visas.

Articles 6 and 7 of the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women (Trafficking Protocol), ratified by Australia in 2005, outline parties’ obligations with respect to assistance and protection of victims of people trafficking and their legal status within receiving States.  Among those obligations, parties are required to:
  • protect the privacy and identity of victims
  • enable victims’ views and concerns to be presented and considered in the criminal justice process
  • consider implementing measures to support the physical, psychological and social recovery of victims (such as provision of appropriate housing, counselling and medical, psychological and material assistance)
  • provide measures that offer victims the possibility of obtaining compensation and
  • consider adopting measures to permit victims to remain in the receiving State temporarily or permanently, giving appropriate consideration to humanitarian and compassionate factors.
The Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs administers Australia’s Support for Victims of People Trafficking Program (support program).  As outlined in the Third Report of the Anti-People Trafficking Interdepartmental Committee, the support program is comprised of the following streams:
  • the Assessment Stream provides up to 45 days of intensive support to all suspected victims
  • the Extended Assessment Stream provides up to 45 days additional support for victims who are willing, but not able, to assist with an investigation or prosecution
  • the Justice Support Stream provides support to a victim assisting with an investigation or prosecution until the matter is finalised and
  • the Temporary Trial Support Stream provides intensive support to victims who return to Australia to give evidence for a prosecution.
Victims leaving the program also receive 20 days of transitional assistance.

The People Trafficking Visa Framework (visa framework), also outlined in that report, allows foreign nationals suspected to be victims of people trafficking to remain lawfully in Australia if they do not already hold a valid visa.  The framework comprises the Bridging F visa, the Criminal Justice Stay visa and the Witness Protection (Trafficking) (Permanent) visa.

A range of changesthat came into effect on 1 July 2009 made the support program and visa framework more accessible and responsive to victims’ needs.  However, in consultations leading up to its introduction, and in submissions to a current Senate inquiry into the Trafficking Bill, many stakeholders have argued that further amendments should be pursued.  The United Nations Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children (Special Rapporteur) also recommended a number of improvements in the May 2012 report on her mission to Australia.

The following diagram outlines the current visa framework and its interaction with the supportprogram:

The current visa framework and its interaction with the support program
 Source: JJ Larsen, L Renshaw, S Gray-Barry, H Andrevski and T Corsbie, Trafficking in persons monitoring report: January 2009-June 2011, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra 2012, p. 13.

Despite the changes made in 2009, it is clear that access to visas and to the support program still vary considerably depending on the ability and willingness of a suspected victim to assist an investigation or prosecution.  It is this aspect that has drawn the most criticism, with a range of stakeholders, as well as the Special Rapporteur and the Greensarguing that access to visas and to the support program should be determined solely on the basis of need, not on a victim’s willingness or ability to assist in the criminal justice process.  In addition, the Law Council of Australia has raised concerns that the focus on assisting the criminal justice process may discourage victims from seeking a visa, due to fears of reprisal against themselves or family members.  Beyond the requirement to give due consideration to humanitarian and compassionate factors, the Trafficking Protocol does not contain anything specific on the matter.  However, guidance issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights states that protection and assistance provided to victims ‘shall not be made conditional upon the capacity or willingness of the trafficked person to cooperate in legal proceedings.’

The Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) has suggested that providing equal access to visas and support to all victims is likely to not only improve outcomes for victims, but also increase their willingness to assist in the criminal justice process.  Victims may be more likely to trust law enforcement authorities if they are confident of their residence status.  Providing equal access could also assist prosecutions by helping to protect against attempts to discredit victims’ testimony on the basis that the victim is seeking residency.

The Special Rapporteur and the ALA have also argued that the initial support period of 45 days is not sufficient for victims to process what they have experienced and to form relationships of trust with immigration and law enforcement agencies.  Among eight formal recommendations made to the Australian Government by the Special Rapporteur on support for victims of trafficking was the extension of the initial period of support from 45 to 90 days.

While not directly relevant to the Trafficking Bill, victims’ access to visas and the support program are important aspects of Australia’s response to people trafficking, and suggestions for improvement deserve the attention of the Government and the Parliament.

The Special Rapporteur’s visitand reportare detailed in earlier FlagPosts.  A broad outline of the Trafficking Bill was also provided in an earlier FlagPost, and a Bills Digest will soon be available on the Parliamentary Library’s website.


  • 21/01/2014 2:34 PM
    Khali Vincent said:

    I agree that visas should be offered on humanitarian grounds. The process of being trafficked and kept in slavery would be extremely traumatic. Having confidence in residence status would help assist the recovery of people who have been trafficked as they would potentially feel much safer and secure, than living in uncertainty, or with the fear of being sent home where they may encounter social isolation or stigmatisation.

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes comments that are not relevant to the article, factually incorrect or politically partisan, as well as spam, profanity and personal abuse. We will close comments after three months.

Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




Refugees asylum immigration climate change Australian foreign policy Parliament social security elections welfare reform welfare policy school education Australian Defence Force health financing indigenous Australians women Private health insurance higher education emissions trading people trafficking Middle East taxation Employment illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Medicare disability Sport Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics United Nations Asia criminal law Afghanistan income management health forced labour Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health Australian Public Service constitution Australian Electoral Commission WADA transport aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system OECD ASADA Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Fair Work Act governance labour force people smuggling debt international relations New Zealand food Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme International Women's Day corruption pensions public service reform children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers High Court skilled migration Banking UK Parliament election results voting mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning doping crime health risks Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy firearms public policy Census Population violence against women domestic violence China ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing by-election European Union family assistance United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion human rights paternalism Canada Financial sector national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage rural and regional alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution procurement Indigenous health e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament 2015 ABS Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers Somalia United Kingdom GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top