NATO at the crossroads: where do Australian interests lie?

Parliament house flag post

NATO at the crossroads: where do Australian interests lie?

Posted 12/08/2010 by Nina Markovic

Do Australia and NATO have common interests? Given the geographic divide, this might not be an obvious issue, but it was perhaps the central question emerging from a public lecture delivered on 2 August 2010 at the Australian National University by the Chairman of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) Military Committee, Admiral Giampaolo di Paola. The Chairman emphasised the growing political dimension of the alliance, which finds itself at a strategic crossroads.

At the recent public lecture, Chairman di Paola noted positive steps towards further collaboration, on issues such as Somali piracy, between NATO and Australia’s most populous neighbour and key trading partner, China. This can be seen as a positive development for Australia because, as the Foreign Minister noted in a speech in March 2010, the problem of piracy falls within Australia's strategic interests. Although it is unlikely that Australia or any of its Asian neighbours will join NATO in the near future, their engagement in NATO’s global operations—both civilian and military through NATO’s comprehensive security agenda—is broadening.

It is expected that by early 2011 NATO will have a new operational strategic framework to guide its outlook and future responses to the multi-dimensional security threats that were mentioned at the lecture, such as nuclear terrorism, proliferation, cyber-threats and piracy. It might also be observed that as the largest non-NATO troop contributor to the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force’s exigent mission in Afghanistan, Australia needs to define where its interests lie in its relationship with NATO. This is particularly important as NATO undergoes transformation of its strategic and institutional thinking towards greater burden-sharing activities and collaboration with its strategic partners world-wide, including in the Asia Pacific region.

Australia’s parliamentary engagement with NATO has intensified in recent years, building on the Australian Government's history of collaboration with NATO which dates back to the early 1950s. In September 2008 the Australian Government facilitated a visit to Australia by members of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly Defence and Security Committee, who also delivered a lecture at Parliament House emphasising cyber-security. In November 2009 Australia sent a parliamentary delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly's 55th annual meeting in Edinburgh, UK. These meetings are generally useful for information-sharing, but it may not be clear in which areas Australia's and NATO's interests intersect, and where they stand apart.

It might be that in this regional context Australia would need to delineate and communicate more robustly its interests with regard to the NATO engagement—in particular on the political, civilian, operational and intelligence-sharing fronts. An updated Australian Government White Paper on foreign policy could initiate the way forward.
(Image sourced from:

Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print


Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament

Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice




immigration refugees elections taxation asylum Parliament criminal law election results Australian Bureau of Statistics social security disability citizenship Indigenous Australians political parties United Kingdom UK Parliament Census statistics banking early childhood education Middle East Australian foreign policy OECD Australian Electoral Commission voting mental health Employment military history by-election election timetable China; Economic policy; Southeast Asia; Africa housing Speaker; House of Representatives; Parliament Productivity Defence income management asylum seekers High Court; Indigenous; Indigenous Australians; Native Title Senate ACT Indigenous education Norfolk Island External Territories leadership aid Papua New Guinea emissions reduction fund; climate change child care funding Electoral reform politics refugees immigration asylum Canada procurement Australian Public Service firearms Indigenous health constitution High Court e-voting internet voting nsw state elections 44th Parliament women 2015 International Women's Day public policy ABS Population Age Pension Death penalty capital punishment execution Bali nine Bali bombings Trade skilled migration Private health insurance Medicare Financial sector EU national security fuel China soft power education violence against women domestic violence Fiji India Disability Support Pension disability employment welfare reform Tasmania Antarctica China Diplomacy Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency Sport ASADA Federal Court WADA ADRV by-elections state and territories terrorism terrorist groups Bills corruption anti-corruption integrity fraud bribery transparency corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform science innovation research and development transport standards Afghanistan Australian Defence Force NATO United States social media Members of Parliament Scottish referendum Middle East; national security; terrorism higher education Higher Education Loan Program HECS welfare policy pensions social services welfare ASIO Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Australian Secret Intelligence Service intelligence community Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 sexual abuse online grooming sexual assault of minors labour force workers

Show all
Show less
Back to top